Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical impact of gadolinium in the MRI diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The incremental value of gadolinium in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection by MRI is controversial.

Objective

To compare diagnostic utility of noncontrast with contrast MRI in the evaluation of pediatric musculoskeletal infections.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 90 gadolinium-enhanced MRIs in children with suspected musculoskeletal infection. Noncontrast and contrast MRI scans were evaluated to determine sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection and identification of abscesses.

Results

Pre- and post-contrast diagnosis of osteomyelitis sensitivity was 89% and 91% (P = 1.00) and specificity was 96% and 96% (P = 1.00), respectively; septic arthritis sensitivity was 50% and 67% (P = 1.00) and specificity was 98% and 98% (P = 1.00), respectively; cellulitis/myositis sensitivity was 100% and 100% (P = 1.00) and specificity was 84% and 88% (P = 0.59), respectively; abscess for the total group was 22 (24.4%) and 42 (46.6%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Abscesses identified only on contrast sequences led to intervention in eight additional children. No child with a final diagnosis of infection had a normal pre-contrast study.

Conclusion

Intravenous gadolinium should not be routinely administered in the imaging work-up of nonspinal musculoskeletal infections, particularly when pre-contrast images are normal. However, gadolinium contrast significantly increases the detection of abscesses, particularly small ones that might not require surgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hopkins KL, Li KC, Bergman G (1995) Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infectious processes. Skeletal Radiol 24:325–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dangman BC, Hoffer FA, Rand FF et al (1992) Osteomyelitis in children: gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 182:743–747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu CW, Hsiao JK, Hsu CY et al (2004) Bacterial pyomyositis: MRI and clinical correlation. Magn Reson Imaging 22:1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saiag P, Le Breton C, Pavlovic M et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging in adults presenting with severe acute infectious cellulitis. Arch Dermatol 130:1150–1158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Bock GW et al (1993) Diagnosis of osteomyelitis: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 189:251–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Offiah AC (2006) Acute osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and discitis: differences between neonates and older children. Eur J Radiol 60:221–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaramillo D, Treves ST, Kasser JR et al (1995) Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in children: appropriate use of imaging to guide treatment. AJR 165:399–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. (2006) Practice Guideline for the performance and interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip and pelvis for musculoskeletal disorders. ACR practice guidelines, pp 327–338

  9. Gutierrez K (2005) Bone and joint infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 52:779–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH et al (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults. AJR 189:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kan JH, Hilmes MA, Martus JE et al (2008) Value of MRI after recent diagnostic or surgical intervention in children with suspected osteomyelitis. AJR 191:1595–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Connolly SA, Connolly LP, Drubach LA et al (2007) MRI for detection of abscess in acute osteomyelitis of the pelvis in children. AJR 189:867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kan JH (2008) Major pitfalls in musculoskeletal imaging-MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38(Suppl 2):S251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller TT, Randolph DA Jr, Staron RB et al (1997) Fat-suppressed MRI of musculoskeletal infection: fast T2-weighted techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. Skeletal Radiol 26:654–658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Averill LW, Hernandez A, Gonzalez L et al (2009) Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR 192:1232–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Radiology in Carlsbad, CA, April 21–25, 2009. Statistics supported in part by Vanderbilt CTSA grant UL1 RR024975 from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Herman Kan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kan, J.H., Young, R.S., Yu, C. et al. Clinical impact of gadolinium in the MRI diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection in children. Pediatr Radiol 40, 1197–1205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1557-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1557-2

Keywords

Navigation