Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radiation therapy for children: evolving technologies in the era of ALARA

  • ALARA CONCEPT IN PEDIATRIC IMAGING: ONCOLOGY
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of ever more sophisticated oncologic imaging and technologies providing far more precise radiation therapy have combined to increase the utilization of sophisticated radiation therapy in childhood cancer. For a majority of children with common central nervous system, soft tissue, bone, and dysontogenic neoplasms, local irradiation is fundamental to successful multi-disciplinary management. Along with more precise target volume definition and radiation delivery, new technologies provide added certainty of patient positioning (electronic portal imaging, cone beam CT) and conformality of dose delivery (3-D conformal irradiation, intensity modulated radiation therapy, proton beam therapy). Each of the major areas of technology development are able to better confine the high-dose region to the intended target, but they are also associated with the potential for larger volumes of uninvolved tissues being exposed to low radiation doses. The latter issue plays a role in documented levels of secondary carcinogenesis, sometimes with greater anticipated incidence than that seen in conventional radiation therapy. Parameters related to carcinogenesis, such as dose–volume relationships and neutron contamination that accompanies high-energy photon irradiation and proton therapy, can be identified, sometimes modulated, and accepted as part of the clinical decision process in fine tuning radiation therapy in this more vulnerable age group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suit H, Goldberg S, Niemierko A et al (2007) Secondary carcinogenesis in patients treated with radiation: a review of data on radiation-induced cancers in human, non-human primate, canine and rodent subjects. Radiat Res 167:12–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smilenov LB, Lieberman HB, Mitchell SA et al (2005) Combined haploinsufficiency for ATM and RAD9 as a factor in cell transformation, apoptosis, and DNA lesion repair dynamics. Cancer Res 65:933–938

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall EJ (2006) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:1–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations. Annals of the ICRP Publication 60. Pergamon, Oxford, England

  6. Travis LB, Rabkin CS, Brown LM et al (2006) Cancer survivorship—genetic susceptibility and second primary cancers: research strategies and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:15–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2008) Secondary neutrons in clinical proton radiotherapy: a charged issue. Radiother Oncol 86:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall EJ, Wuu CS (2003) Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:83–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verellen D, De RM, Storme G (2008) A (short) history of image-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 86:4–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Galvin JM, Ezzell G, Eisbrauch A et al (2004) Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: a joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1616–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nutting C, Dearnaley DP, Webb S (2000) Intensity modulated radiation therapy: a clinical review. Br J Radiol 73:459–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerrero Urbano MT, Nutting CM (2004) Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part I. Br J Radiol 77:88–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang E, Teh BS, Strother DR et al (2002) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: early report on the reduction of ototoxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein EE, Maserang B, Wood R et al (2006) Peripheral doses from pediatric IMRT. Med Phys 33:2525–2531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guerrero Urbano MT, Nutting CM (2004) Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part II. Br J Radiol 77:177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Followill D, Geis P, Boyer A (1997) Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensity modulated conformal therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:667–672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu XG, Bednarz B, Paganetti H (2008) A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction. Phys Med Biol 53:R193–R241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL et al (2003) High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin's disease: report from the Late Effects Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4386–4394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhatia S, Robison LL, Oberlin O et al (1996) Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med 334:745–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kudchadker RJ, Chang EL, Bryan F et al (2004) An evaluation of radiation exposure from portal films taken during definitive course of pediatric radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1229–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olch AJ, Geurts M, Thomadsen B et al (2007) Portal imaging practice patterns of children's oncology group institutions: dosimetric assessment and recommendations for minimizing unnecessary exposure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:594–600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng LC, Yang CC, Sim S et al (2007) Dose comparison of megavoltage cone-beam and orthogonal-pair portal images. J Appl Clin Med Phys 8:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morin O, Gillis A, Descovich M et al (2007) Patient dose considerations for routine megavoltage cone-beam CT imaging. Med Phys 34:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beltran C, Bani-Hashemi A, Faddegon B et al (2006) Low dose MV CBCT for daily pediatric localization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(1 Supplement):S678 2008

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jones B (2006) The case for particle therapy. Br J Radiol 79:24–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Levin WP, Kooy H, Loeffler JS et al (2005) Proton beam therapy. Br J Cancer 93:849–854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Merchant TE, Hua CH, Shukla H et al (2008) Proton versus photon radiotherapy for common pediatric brain tumors: comparison of models of dose characteristics and their relationship to cognitive function. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brada M, Pijls-Johannesma M, De RD (2007) Proton therapy in clinical practice: current clinical evidence. J Clin Oncol 25:965–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson VC, McDonough J, Tochner Z (2005) Proton beam irradiation in pediatric oncology: an overview. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 27:444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee CT, Bilton SD, Famiglietti RM et al (2005) Treatment planning with protons for pediatric retinoblastoma, medulloblastoma, and pelvic sarcoma: how do protons compare with other conformal techniques? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:362–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber DC, Rutz HP, Bolsi A et al (2007) Spot scanning proton therapy in the curative treatment of adult patients with sarcoma: the Paul Scherrer Institute experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:865–871

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yock TI, MacDonald SM, Safai S et al (2008) Proton radiotherapy for ependymoma: initial clinical outcomes and dose comparisons for intensity modulated radiation with photons, proton radiation, and intensity modulated proton therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(1 Supplement):S575–S576

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Supported in part by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 220, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA

    Larry E. Kun & Chris Beltran

Authors
  1. Larry E. Kun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Beltran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry E. Kun.

Additional information

Authors have no relevant financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest related to the material to be presented

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kun, L.E., Beltran, C. Radiation therapy for children: evolving technologies in the era of ALARA. Pediatr Radiol 39 (Suppl 1), 65–70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1098-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1098-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation