Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Even when histologic findings are highly suggestive of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), cholangiographic correlation is required for the diagnosis. The present gold standard, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), is invasive and associated with complications.

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing PSC in children.

Materials and methods

MRCP studies were retrospectively reviewed in 20 children with clinical suspicion of PSC and who had undergone liver biopsy. MRCP studies were considered positive or negative for PSC depending on the presence or absence of dilatation, irregularity, multifocal strictures and beading of the bile ducts.

Results

Twenty children (14 boys, 6 girls) with an average age of 13 years qualified for the study. Of 19 diagnostic MRCP studies, 16 were called positive and 3 were called negative. An overall diagnosis of PSC-positive was assigned to all 19 patients based on clinical and laboratory findings, biopsy results and cholangiographic data. Based on this overall diagnosis, MRCP was 84% sensitive and accurate to diagnose PSC in children.

Conclusion

MRCP can be a valuable tool in diagnosing pediatric PSC that can demonstrate major intra- and extrahepatic ducts in most cases. An unequivocally positive MRCP study should not be followed by ERCP for diagnosing PSC in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilschanski M, Chait P, Wade JA et al (1995) Primary sclerosing cholangitis in 32 children: clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features, with survival analysis. Hepatology 22:1415–1422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldstein AE, Perrault J, El-Youssif M et al (2003) Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: a long-term follow-up study. Hepatology 38:210–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Majoie CB, Reeders S, Sanders JB et al (1991) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a modified classification of cholangiographic findings. AJR 157:495–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK et al (2002) MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: interobserver variability and comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. AJR 179:399–407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng CL, Fogel EL, Sherman S et al (2005) Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a large series report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41:445–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJ et al (2000) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography – a case-control study. Radiology 215:71–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitella KM, Enns RA, Keogan MT et al (2002) Comparison of MR cholangiographic techniques with contrast enhanced cholangiography in evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis. AJR 178:327–334

    Google Scholar 

  8. Textor HJ, Flacke S, Panleit D et al (2002) 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 34:984–990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrara C, Valeria G, Salvolini L et al (2002) MR cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis in children. Pediatr Radiol 32:413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bjornsson E, Olsson R, Bergquist A et al (2008) The natural history of small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 134:975–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bjornsson E, Boberg KM, Cullen S et al (2002) Patients with small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis have a favorable long term prognosis. Gut 51:731–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan GG, Laupland KB, Butzner D et al (2007) The burden of large and small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis in adults and children: a population-based analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1042–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moff SL, Kamel IR, Eustace J et al (2006) Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 64:219–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delaney L, Applegate KE, Karmazyn B et al (2008) MR cholangiopancreatography in children: feasibility, safety, and initial experience. Pediatr Radiol 38:64–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Revelon G, Rashid A, Kawamoto S et al (1999) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. AJR 173:1037–1042

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Outwater EK et al (1999) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: MR imaging features. AJR 172:1527–1533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Batres LA, Russo P, Mathews M et al (2005) Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: a histologic follow-up study. Pediatr Dev Pathol 8:568–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Govind B. Chavhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chavhan, G.B., Roberts, E., Moineddin, R. et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Pediatr Radiol 38, 868–873 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0918-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0918-6

Keywords

Navigation