Skip to main content
Log in

Visualization of neonatal coronary arteries on multidetector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multidetector CT (MDCT) seems to be a promising tool for detection of neonatal coronary arteries, but whether the ECG-gated or non-ECG-gated technique should be used has not been established.

Objective

To compare the detection rate and image quality of neonatal coronary arteries on MDCT using ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated techniques.

Materials and methods

Twelve neonates with complex congenital heart disease were included. The CT scan was acquired using an ECG-gated technique, and the most quiescent phase of the RR interval was selected to represent the ECG-gated images. The raw data were then reconstructed without the ECG signal to obtain non-ECG-gated images. The detection rate and image quality of nine coronary artery segments in the two sets of images were then compared. A two-tailed paired t test was used with P values <0.05 considered as statistically significant.

Results

In all coronary segments the ECG-gated technique had a better detection rate and produced images of better quality. The difference between the two techniques ranged from 25% in the left main coronary artery to 100% in the distal right coronary artery.

Conclusion

For neonates referred for MDCT, if evaluation of coronary artery anatomy is important for the clinical management or surgical planning, the ECG-gated technique should be used because it can reliably detect the coronary arteries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Brook MM et al (1999) Echocardiographic diagnosis alone for the complete repair of major congenital heart defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Soongswang J, Nana A, Laohaprasitiporn D et al (2000) Limitation of transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases. J Med Assoc Thai 83(Suppl 2):S111–S117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marek J, Skovranek J, Hucin B et al (1995) Seven-year experience of noninvasive preoperative diagnostics in children with congenital heart defects: comprehensive analysis of 2,788 consecutive patients. Cardiology 86:488–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruzmetov M, Jimenez MA, Pruitt A et al (2005) Repair of tetralogy of Fallot with anomalous coronary arteries coursing across the obstructed right ventricular outflow tract. Pediatr Cardiol 26:537–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang YH, Sung SC, Lee HD et al (2005) Coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction can yield better result in arterial switch operation: comparison with open trap door technique. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1634–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sung SC, Chang YH, Lee HD et al (2005) Arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries with coronary arteries from a single aortic sinus. Ann Thorac Surg 80:636–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schreiber C, Horer J, Lange R (2005) Modification of the arterial switch procedure in the presence of a rare coronary arterial pattern. Cardiol Young 15:82–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cetin G, Tireli E, Ozkara A (2004) Arterial switch operations for single coronary artery ostium or intramural coronary artery. Circ J 68:1179–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolcz J, Januszewska K, Mroczek T et al (2004) Anatomical correction of complex forms of transposition of the great arteries in neonates. Scand Cardiovasc J 38:164–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gremmels DB, Tacy TA, Brook MM et al (2004) Accuracy of coronary artery anatomy using two-dimensional echocardiography in d-transposition of great arteries using a two-reviewer method. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:454–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simpson JM, Moore P, Teitel DF (2001) Cardiac catheterization of low birth weight infants. Am J Cardiol 87:1372–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vitiello R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen D et al (1998) Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1433–1440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cinar A, Haliloglu M, Karagoz T et al (2004) Interrupted aortic arch in a neonate: multidetector CT diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 34:901–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frush DP, Herlong JR (2005) Pediatric thoracic CT angiography. Pediatr Radiol 35:11–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bean MJ, Pannu H, Fishman EK (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging of complex congenital cardiovascular abnormalities. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:721–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2003) CT of congenital heart disease: normal anatomy and typical pathologic conditions. Radiographics 23 (Spec No):S147–S165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilkeson RC, Ciancibello L, Zahka K (2003) Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. AJR 180:973–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:347–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Visibility of the origin and proximal course of coronary arteries on non-ECG-gated heart CT in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 35:792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmitt R, Froehner S, Brunn J et al (2005) Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: imaging with contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomography. Eur Radiol 15:1110–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dogan OF, Guvener M, Demircin M et al (2006) Diagnosis of a coronary artery anomaly by 16-channel computed tomography coronary angiography in an infant. Pediatr Cardiol 27:658–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coche E, Muller P, Gerber B (2006) Anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the main pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) illustrated before and after surgical correction on ECG-gated 40-slice computed tomography. Heart 92:1193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC et al (2006) Using multidetector-row CT in neonates with complex congenital heart disease to replace diagnostic cardiac catheterization for anatomical investigation: initial experiences in technical and clinical feasibility. Pediatr Radiol 36:1273–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutgesell HP, Huhta JC, Latson LA et al (1985) Accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 55:514–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Su JT, Chung T, Muthupillai R et al (2005) Usefulness of real-time navigator magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating coronary artery origins in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol 95:679–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our appreciation to Mr. Larry Chia-Hon Chen (Philips Medical Systems, Taiwan) and Mr. Leon Wei-Chun Lee (Unison Tek Co. Ltd., Taiwan) for their assistance in improving the quality of neonatal cardiac CT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Chen Tsai.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

247_2007_512_MOESM1_ESM.gif

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, IC., Lee, T., Chen, MC. et al. Visualization of neonatal coronary arteries on multidetector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique. Pediatr Radiol 37, 818–825 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0512-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0512-3

Keywords

Navigation