Abstract
Background
Ultrasonography is an important tool in the screening and diagnosis of patients with suspected intussusception.
Objective
To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy and performance of junior residents and compare it to that of senior residents and staff radiologists.
Materials and methods
Between January 1999 and February 2003, 151 patients with suspected intussusception underwent screening US. The mean age of the patients was 13.8 months. Patients were divided into three groups according to examiner: staff radiologist, senior resident or junior resident.
Results
Sixty-five patients had both US and air enema. Forty-four patients had a positive US result; 37 (84%) were true positive and 7 (16%) were false positive. Twenty-one patients had a negative US result; 18 (86%) were true negative and 3 (14%) were false negative. Eighty-six patients underwent screening US only and were then kept under observation in the emergency room. They were all diagnosed as having a non-surgical condition. The total accuracy rate was 93%, sensitivity was 84%, specificity was 97%, positive predictive value was 93% and negative predictive value was 94%. Accuracy rate, sensitivity and specificity were 92%, 85% and 98% for staff radiologists, 94%, 75% and 96% for senior residents and 95%, 83% and 97% for junior residents, respectively.
Conclusions
Junior residents perform as well as staff radiologists in screening US for suspected intussusception and have gained both the respect and confidence of the paediatricians.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swischuk LE, Hayden CK, Boulden T (1985) Intussusception: indications for ultrasonography and an explanation of the doughnut and pseudokidney signs. Pediatr Radiol 15:388–391
Verschelden P, Filiatraut D, Garel L, et al (1992) Intussusception in children: reliability of US diagnosis—a prospective study. Radiology 184:741–744
Weinberger E, Winters WD (1992) Intussusception in children: the role of sonography. Radiology 184:601–602
Bhisitkul DM, Listernick R, Sholnik A, et al (1992) Clinical application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intussusception. J Pediatr 121:182–186
Harrington L, Connolly B, Hu X, et al (1998) Ultrasonographic and clinical predictors of intussusception. J Pediatr 132:836–839
Pracos JP, Tran-minh VA, Morin De Finte Ch, et al (1987) Acute intestinal intussusception in children: contribution of ultrasonography (145 cases). Ann Radiol 30:525–530
Henrikson S, Blane CE, Koujok K, et al (2003) The effect of screening sonography on the positive rate of enemas for intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 33:190–193
Daneman A, Alton DJ (1996) Intussusception: Issues and controversies related to diagnosis and reduction. Radiol Clin North Am 34:743–756
Schmit P, Rohrschneider WK, Christmann D (1999) Intestinal intussusception survey about diagnostic and nonsurgical therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Radiol 29:752–761
Wang G, Liu S (1988) Enema reduction of intussusception by hydrostatic pressure under ultrasound guidance: a report of 377 cases. J Pediatr Surg 23:814–818
Swischuk LE, John SD, Swischuk PN (1994) Spontaneous reduction of intussusception: verification with US. Radiology 192:269–271
Mapagu C, Lam A, Martin HCO, et al (2003) Intermittent intussusception. J Paediatr Child Health 39:147–148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eshed, I., Gorenstein, A., Serour, F. et al. Intussusception in children: can we rely on screening sonography performed by junior residents?. Pediatr Radiol 34, 134–137 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-003-1089-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-003-1089-0