Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardization of a Continuous Ramp Ergometer Protocol for Clinical Exercise Testing in Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing a standardized protocol for pediatric exercise laboratories is challenging. Our objective was to report normal pediatric values for a continuous non-steady state cycle ergometer ramp protocol to achieve 8–10 min of exercise based on sex and weight. One hundred seventeen patients (117) [mean age 13 ± 2.8 years, range 7–18 years (51% male)] referred for chest pain with normal cardiac evaluation underwent cardiopulmonary testing on a cycle ergometer. Patients entered one of the four continuous ramp protocols (10, 15, 20, and 25 W/min ramp) to achieve an expected peak workload of 3 W/kg at an increase of 0.3 to 0.35 W/kg/min. Exercise test outcomes measured included duration, peak heart rate, work, respiratory exchange ratio, peak oxygen consumption, peak blood pressure, and ventilatory anaerobic threshold. An exercise duration of 8–10 min was achieved in a majority of the study population; however, interactions with age (older, longer duration) and sex (males, longer duration) were present. Using our algorithm (0.3–0.35 W/kg × weight), we demonstrated four non-steady state ramp bike ergometer protocols (10, 15, 20, and 25 W/min) that can be applied to males and females of different ages and weights to achieve an exercise duration of 8–10 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Casabur R, Whipp B (1999) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation: including pathophysiology and clinical applications, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paridon S, Alpert BS, Boas SR, Cabrera ME, Caldarera LL, Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Knilans TK, Nixon PA, Rhodes J, Yetman AT, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth (2006) Clinical stress testing in the pediatric age group: a statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in youth. Circulation 113:1905–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rowland TW (1993) Aerobic exercise testing protocols. In: Rowland TW (ed) Pediatric laboratory exercise testing: clinical guidelines. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 19–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tomassoni TL (1993) Conducting the pediatric exercise test. In: Rowland TW (ed) Pediatric laboratory exercise testing: clinical guidelines. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blais S, Berbari J, Counil FP, Dallaire F (2015) A systematic review of reference values in pediatric cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Pediatr Cardiol 36:1553–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper DM, Weiler-Ravell D, Whipp BJ, Wasserman K (1984) Aerobic parameters of exercise as a function of body size during growth in children. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 56:628–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Godfrey S, Davies CT, Wozniak E, Barnes CA (1971) Cardio-respiratory response to exercise in normal children. Clin Sci 40(5):419–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanner CS, Heise CT, Barber G (1991) Correlation of the physiologic parameters of a continuous ramp versus an incremental James exercise protocol in normal children. Am J Cardiol 67:309–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ten Harkel ADJ, Takken T, Van Osch-Gevers M, Helbing WA (2011) Normal values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in children. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 18:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall WQ (1978) Puberty. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds) Human growth, vol 2. Plenum, New York, pp 141–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J, ATS/ERS Task Force (2005) Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 26:319–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petzl DH, Haber P, Schuster E, Popow C, Haschke F (1988) Reliability of estimation of maximum performance capacity on the basis of submaximum ergometric stress tests in children 10–14 years old. Eur J Pediatr 147:174–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brooks GA, Fahey TD, Baldwin KM (1984) Sex difference in physical performance. In: Brooks GA, Fahey TD (eds) Exercise physiology: human bioenergetics and its applications, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 637–659

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1986) A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60:2020–2027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.) Body mass index: considerations for practitioners. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/BMIforPactitioners.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2017

  16. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Clinical growth charts. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/clinical_charts.htm. Accessed 14 Sep 2017

  17. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM (2010) Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA 303:242–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. Accessed 20 Sep 2016

  19. Freedson PS, Goodman TL (1993) Measurement of oxygen consumption. In: Rowland TW (ed) Pediatric laboratory exercise testing: clinical guidelines. Human Kinetics, Champaign, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alpert BS, Flood NL, Strong WB, Dover EV, DuRant RH, Martin AM, Booker DL (1982) Responses to ergometer exercise in a healthy biracial population of children. J Pediatr 101:538–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley W. Robinson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Work completed at Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Octavio, J.M., Folk, A.L., Falini, L. et al. Standardization of a Continuous Ramp Ergometer Protocol for Clinical Exercise Testing in Children. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 834–840 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02079-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02079-2

Keywords

Navigation