Skip to main content
Log in

Short-Term and Mid-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Occlusion of Ventricular Septal Defects via a Subaxillary Approach in a Single Center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This retrospective, single-center study evaluated short-term and mid-term results of minimally invasive surgery to occlude ventricular septal defects (VSDs) using a subaxillary approach. The procedure was performed on 429 children (224 boys, 205 girls; age 2.4 ± 2.5 years; mean weight 12.7 ± 10.1 kg) between January 2014 and December 2016 at the Children’s Heart Center of Henan Province People’s Hospital. An approximately 2-cm subaxillary incision was made between the third and fifth ribs, and the appropriate right atrium or ventricle was punctured under the guidance of transencephalographic echocardiography (TEE). The VSD was then occluded under TEE guidance. The mean size of the VSDs was 4.2 ± 1.0 mm, and the occluder measured 5.3 ± 1.3 mm. Asymmetrical occluders were used in 44 patients and symmetrical occluders in 385 patients. The operative time was 60.7 ± 21.3 min, and time in the intensive care unit was 20.9 ± 6.5 h. Blood loss was 12.4 ± 14.4 ml. There were no deaths among these patients. Occluder displacement occurred in two cases. There were no complications (e.g., third-degree atrioventricular block, new aortic regurgitation, reoperation for massive bleeding, serious infection). All patients were followed for 6–48 months, during which time there were ten cases of a postoperative residual shunt, which self-closed in eight during follow-up. The other two cases are still being followed. No complications occurred during follow-up (e.g., reoperation, aortic regurgitation, atrioventricular block, occluder abscission). Occluding VSDs using the subaxillary approach is safe and effective. Short-term and mid-term results are satisfactory. Further follow-up is required regarding long-term results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Penny DJ, Vick GW 3rd (2011) Ventricular septal defect. Lancet 377:1103–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McDaniel NL (2001) Ventricular and atrial septal defects. Pediatr Rev 22:265–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xing Q, Pan S, An Q et al (2010) Minimally invasive perventricular device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect without cardiopulmonary bypass: multicenter experience and mid-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(6):1409–1415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hongxin L, Zhang N, Wenbin G et al (2014) Peratrial device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects through a right parasternal approach. Ann Thorac Surg 98(2):668–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hazekamp MG et al (2010) Surgery for transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect and lef ventricular outfowtractobstruction: European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38:699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tao K, Zhu D, An Q et al (2012) Perventricular device closure of patent ductus arteriosus: a secondary chance. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1007–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang GC, Chen Q, Cao H et al (2013) Minimally invasive perventricular device closure of ventricular septal defect in infants under transthoracicechocardiograhic guidance: feasibility and comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 11:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu S, Yang Y, Wu Q et al (2014) Results of two different approaches to closure of subaortic ventricular septal defects in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:648–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin S, Zhu D, Lin K et al (2014) Perventricular device closure of congenital ventricular septal defects. J Card Surg 29:390–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ou-Yang WB, Li SJ, Wang SZ et al (2015) Echocardiographic guided closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg 100:1398–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xing Q, Wu Q, Shi L et al (2015) Minimally invasive transthoracic device closure of isolated ventricular septal defects without cardiopulmonary bypass: long-term follow-up results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149:257–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun JJ, Fan TB, Peng BT et al (2015) Effect of surgical treatment of congenital heart disease by right subaxillary small incision surgery. Chin J Pract Med 42(5):20–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Song SB, Fan T, Li B et al (2016) Minimally invasive closure via subaxillary approach for common congenital heart disease: a mid-term follow-up study. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 32(11):680–682

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liang WJ, Fan TB, Li B et al (2015) Surgical closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect through small incision via right subaxillary approach. Chin J Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr 30(13):1037–1038

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang S, Zhuang Z, Zhang H et al (2014) Perventricular closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using the concentric occluder device. Pediatr Cardiol 35(4):580–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo YK, Chen WH, Xiong C et al (2015) Comparison of effectiveness and cost between perventricular device occlusion and minimally invasive surgical repair for perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 36(2):308–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou SJ, Fan TB, Song SB et al (2017) Follow-up results of minimally invasive closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect through left subaxillary approach. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr 32(13):993–995

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu SS, Pan XB, Chang Q (2017) Expert consensus on interventional diagnosis and treatment of common cardiovascular diseases through surgical approaches. Chin Circ J 32(2):105–119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the roles of all our colleagues, nurses, and others involved in the care of the study patients. We thank Nancy Schatken BS, MT(ASCP), from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (http://www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bangtian Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Henan Provinces of People´s Hospital. All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Medical Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, X., Peng, B., Zhang, Y. et al. Short-Term and Mid-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Occlusion of Ventricular Septal Defects via a Subaxillary Approach in a Single Center. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 198–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1980-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1980-y

Keyword

Navigation