Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electrocardiographic RR and QT Interval Variability in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect and Healthy Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atrial septal defect is a common congenital heart disease. In patients with atrial septal defect, left-to-right shunting increases the right atrial and right ventricular preload. This pathological change affects sinus node automaticity and myocardial depolarization and repolarization, and has the potential to evoke arrhythmogenic substrates. We examined the effect of atrial septal defect on sinus node automaticity and myocardial repolarization by investigating the variability in the repolarization interval, namely the QT variability index (QTVI) and variability ratio (VR). This retrospective study included 38 patients (mean age, 2.2 ± 1.9 years; mean left-to-right shunt ratio, 2.1 ± 0.70) and 40 age-matched healthy control subjects evaluated from 2008 to 2015. QTVI was calculated using the ratio of the repolarization parameter variance to heart rate variance, and VR was calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation (SD) of QT intervals to the SD of RR intervals on electrocardiography. There was a significant difference in the SD of all normal RR intervals, heart rate variance, VR, and QTVI of control subjects or patients with low shunt ratio compared with patients with high shunt ratio (all P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis revealed strong positive correlations between the left-to-right shunt ratio and VR (r = 0.662, P < 0.0001) or QTVI (r = 0.808, P < 0.0001). These repolarization indices provide information on alteration of sinus node autonomic control and the pathophysiology of myocardial repolarization, and could be used as a noninvasive indicator of the shunt ratio in children with atrial septal defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van der Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:2241–2247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM (2014) Atrial septal defects. Lancet 383:1921–1932. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62145-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuijpers JM, Mulder BJ, Bouma BJ (2015) Secundum atrial septal defect in adults: a practical review and recent developments. Neth Heart J 23:205–211. doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0663-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Moons P, Bovijn L, Budts W, Belmans A, Gewillig M (2010) Temporal trends in survival to adulthood among patients born with congenital heart disease from 1970 to 1992 in Belgium. Circulation 122:2264–2272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yong G, Khairy P, Guise PD et al (2009) Pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects a longitudinal study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:455–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabriels C, De Meester P, Pasquet A et al (2014) A different view on predictors of pulmonary hypertension in secundum atrial septal defect. Int J Cardiol 176:833–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chubb H, Whitaker J, Williams SE, Head CE, Chung NA, Wright MJ, O’Neill M (2014) Pathophysiology and management of arrhythmias associated with atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 3:168–172. doi:10.15420/aer.2014.3.3.168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Morgan JG, Spence SJ, Grigg LE, Kalman JM (2003) Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial electrical remodeling in patients with an atrial septal defect. Circulation 8:1775–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, Groot NMSD et al (2010) ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010) The task force on the management of grown-up congenital heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 31:2915–2957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finley JP, Nugent ST, Hellenbrand W (1987) Heart rate variability in children: spectral analysis of developmental changes between 5 and 24 years. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 65:2048–2052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Folino AF, Buja G, Bauce B, Thiene G, dalla Volta S, Nava A (2002) Heart rate variability in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy correlation with clinical and prognostic features. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1285–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Counihan PJ, Fei L, Bashir Y, Farrell TG, Haywood GA, McKenna WJ (1993) Assessment of heart rate variability in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Association with clinical and prognostic features. Circulation 88:1682–1690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumert M, Porta A, Vos MA, Malik M, Couderc JP, Laguna P, Piccirillo G, Smith GL, Tereshchenko LG, Volders PG (2016) QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC working group on cardiac cellular electrophysiology. Europace 18:925–944. doi:10.1093/europace/euv405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berger RD, Kasper EK, Baughman KL, Marban E, Calkins H, Tomaselli GF (1997) Beat-to-beat QT interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 96:1557–1565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oosterhoff P, Tereshchenko LG, van der Heyden MA, Ghanem RN, Fetics BJ, Berger RD, Vos MA (2011) Short-term variability of repolarization predicts ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death in patients with structural heart disease: a comparison with QT variability index. Heart Rhythm 8:1584–1590. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobson CP, Kim A, Haigney M (2013) QT variability index. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 56:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kusuki H, Kuriki M, Horio K, Hosoi M, Matsuura H, Fujino M, Eryu Y, Miyata M, Yasuda T, Yamazaki T, Nagaoka S, Hata T (2011) Beat-to-beat QT interval variability in children: normal and physiologic data. J Electrocardiol 44:326–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuriki M, Fujino M, Tanaka K, Horio K, Kusuki H, Hosoi M, Eryu Y, Kato T, Yamazaki T, Hata T (2011) Ventricular repolarization lability in children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Cardiol 32:487–491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen BT, Larroude CE, Rasmussen LP, Holstein-Rathlou NH, Hojgaard MV, Agner E, Kanters JK (2004) Beat-to-beat QT dynamics in healthy subjects. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 9:3–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen BT, Abildstrom SZ, Larroude CE, Agner E, Torp-Pedersen C, Nyvad O, Ottesen M, Wachtell K, Kanters JK (2005) QT dynamics in risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm 2:357–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Massin M, von Bernuth G (1998) Clinical and haemodynamic correlates of heart rate variability in children with congenital heart disease. Eur J Pediatr 157:967–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernardi L, Porta C, Gabutti A, Spicuzza L, Sleight P (2001) Modulatory effects of respiration. Auton Neurosci 90:47–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finley JP, Nugent ST, Hellenbrand W, Craig M, Gillis DA (1989) Sinus arrhythmia in children with atrial septal defect: an analysis of heart rate variability before and after surgical repair. Br Heart J 61:280–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Massin MM, Derkenne B, von Bernuth G (1998) Heart rate behavior in children with atrial septal defect. Cardiology 90:269–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bakari S, Koca B, Öztunç F, Abuhandan M (2013) Heart rate variability in patients with atrial septal defect and healthy children. J Cardiol 22:436–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Uchida H, Nishio M, Omeki Y, Takeuchi Y, Nagata R, Oikawa S, Nagatani A, Eryu Y, Hata T, Yoshikawa T (2016) Variability of myocardial repolarization in pediatric patients with a ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol. doi:10.1007/s00246-016-1457-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Triposkiadis F, Karayannis G, Giamouzis G, Skoularigis J, Louridas G, Butler J (2009) The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1747–1762. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Mancia G (2015) Sympathetic activation in cardiovascular disease: evidence, clinical impact and therapeutic implications. Eur J Clin Invest 45:1367–1375. doi:10.1111/eci.12553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Raghunandan DS, Desai N, Mallavarapu M, Berger RD, Yeragani VK (2005) Increased beat-to-beat QT variability in patients with congestive cardiac failure. Indian Heart J 57:138–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baumert M, Schlaich MP, Nalivaiko E, Lambert E, Sari CI, Kaye DM, Elser MD, Sanders P, Lambert G (2010) Relation between QT interval variability and cardiac sympathetic activity in hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300:H1412–H1417. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01184.2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Tsuneaki Sadanaga for his excellent comments, and we thank Mr. Hirofumi Kusuki and Miss. Yuri Mizutani for their technical assistance.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) (#26350944).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadayoshi Hata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents/guardians included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eryu, Y., Hata, T., Nagatani, A. et al. Electrocardiographic RR and QT Interval Variability in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect and Healthy Children. Pediatr Cardiol 38, 582–587 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1551-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1551-z

Keywords

Navigation