Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Disease in an Integrated Health Care System

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reported prenatal detection rates (PDRs) for significant congenital heart disease (sCHD) have been suboptimal, even in the current era. Changes in prenatal ultrasound policy and training may lead to improved prenatal detection of sCHD. This study analyzed the results of a policy to assess fetal cardiac outflow tracts shown by screening prenatal ultrasound using the electronic medical record (EMR). During a 6-year period, fetuses and patients younger than 1 year with sCHD were identified. The EMR was used to gather detection and outcome data. As an internal control within the same health care system, the PDR of only the surgical cases was compared with that of a similar group in which documentation of the fetal cardiac outflow tracts was not standard policy. Among 25,666 births, sCHD was identified in 93 fetuses or patients, yielding an incidence of 3.6 per 1,000 births. The PDR was 74.1 %. Detection after birth but before discharge was 20.4 %, and detection after discharge was 5.4 %. A significant improvement in the PDR of sCHD was found when a concerted effort was made to obtain fetal cardiac outflow tract views during pregnancy screening (59.3 vs 28 %). Within an integrated health care system and with the use of an EMR, a PDR of 74 % can be obtained, and 94 % of sCHD can be detected before discharge. A concerted program that includes documentation of fetal cardiac outflow tracts in the pregnancy screening can result in improved PDR of sCHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acharya G, Sitras V, Maltau JM, Dahl LB, Kaaresen PI, Hanssen TA, Lunde P (2004) Major congenital heart disease in Northern Norway: shortcomings of pre- and postnatal diagnosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:1124–1129. doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00404.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Achiron R, Glaser J, Gelernter I, Hegesh J, Yagel S (1992) Extended fetal echocardiographic examination for detecting cardiac malformations in low risk pregnancies. BMJ 304:671–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown KL, Ridout DA, Hoskote A, Verhulst L, Ricci M, Bull C (2006) Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates. Heart 92:1298–1302. doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.078097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bull C (1999) Current and potential impact of fetal diagnosis on prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK. British Paediatric Cardiac Association. Lancet 354:1242–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho JS, Mavrides E, Shinebourne EA, Campbell S, Thilaganathan B (2002) Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects. Heart 88:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chew C, Halliday JL, Riley MM, Penny DJ (2007) Population-based study of antenatal detection of congenital heart disease by ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:619–624. doi:10.1002/uog.4023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedberg MK, Silverman NH, Moon-Grady AJ, Tong E, Nourse J, Sorenson B, Lee J, Hornberger LK (2009) Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 155:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garne E, Stoll C, Clementi M (2001) Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:386–391. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter S, Heads A, Wyllie J, Robson S (2000) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the northern region of England: benefits of a training programme for obstetric ultrasonographers. Heart 84:294–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaeggi ET, Sholler GF, Jones OD, Cooper SG (2001) Comparative analysis of pattern, management and outcome of pre- versus postnatally diagnosed major congenital heart disease: a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:380–385. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00398.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoo NS, Van Essen P, Richardson M, Robertson T (2008) Effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects in South Australia: a population analysis 1999–2003. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48:559–563. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00915.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khoshnood B, de Vigan C, Vodovar V, Goujard J, Lhomme A, Bonnet D, Goffinet F (2006) Trends in antenatal diagnosis, pregnancy termination, and perinatal mortality in infants with congenital heart disease: evaluation in the general population of Paris 1983–2000. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod Paris 35(5 Pt 1):455–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marek J, Tomek V, Skovranek J, Povysilova V, Samanek M (2011) Prenatal ultrasound screening of congenital heart disease in an unselected national population: a 21-year experience. Heart 97:124–130. doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.206623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montana E, Khoury MJ, Cragan JD, Sharma S, Dhar P, Fyfe D (1996) Trends and outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations by fetal echocardiography in a well-defined birth population, Atlanta, Georgia, 1990–1994. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1805–1809. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00381-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikkila A, Bjorkhem G, Kallen B (2007) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Acta Paediatr 96:49–52. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00023.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogge G, Gaglioti P, Maccanti S, Faggiano F, Todros T (2006) Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease with four-chamber and outflow-tract views: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:779–784. doi:10.1002/uog.3830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinto NM, Keenan HT, Minich LL, Puchalski MD, Heywood M, Botto LD (2012) Barriers to prenatal detection of congenital heart disease: a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40:418–425. doi:10.1002/uog.10116

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sharland GK, Allan LD (1992) Screening for congenital heart disease prenatally: results of a 2½-year study in the South East Thames Region. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sklansky MS, Berman DP, Pruetz JD, Chang RK (2009) Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: superiority of outflow tracts over the 4-chamber view. J Ultrasound Med 28:889–899

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH (2006) The examiner’s ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:8–14. doi:10.1002/uog.2804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis J. Levy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, D.J., Pretorius, D.H., Rothman, A. et al. Improved Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Disease in an Integrated Health Care System. Pediatr Cardiol 34, 670–679 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0526-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0526-y

Keywords

Navigation