Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of Doppler-Derived Estimation of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Congenital Heart Disease: An Index of Operability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is a critical and essential parameter during the assessment and selection of modality of treatment in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) accompanied by pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Cardiac catheterization is the “gold standard” but is an invasive method for PVR measurement. A noninvasive and reliable method for estimation of PVR in children has been a major challenge and most desirable during past decades, especially for those who need repeated measurements. In a prospective study and among consecutive patients who were referred for cardiac catheterizations, PVR was calculated as the ratio of the transpulmonary pressure gradient (∆P) to the amount of the pulmonary flow (QP) accordingly for 20 patients with CHD and high PAH. Subsequently and noninvasively, PVR was assessed for these patients by a Doppler echocardiography-derived index defined as the ratio of the tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVm/s) to the velocity time integral (VTIcm) of the right-ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). There was a good correlation between PVR measured at catheterization (PVRcath) and TRV/VTIm ratio; the mean of three measurements of VTI (VTIm) with R 2 = 0.53 (p = 0.008). In addition, a TRV/VTIm value of 0.2 provided a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 100% for PVR >6 Woods units (WU) as well as sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90% for a PVR equal to 8 WU. PVR value between 6 and 8 WU by catheterization has been considered as a cut-off point for intervention in children with left-to-right shunts and PAH. In conclusion, Doppler-derived TRV/VTIm ratio is a reliable index that may be helpful as a supplementary diagnostic tool for the selection of modality of treatment and follow-up of patients with PAH and increased PVR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB et al (2003) Echocardiographic determination of mean pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Cadiol 92:1373–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB et al (2003) Simple method for noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1021–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atiq M, Tasneem H, Aziz K (2008) Estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance with Doppler diastolic gradients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 16:221–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RMF (2000) Possibilities and impossibilities in the evaluation of pulmonary vascular disease in congenital heart defects. Eur Heart J 21:17–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger M, Haimowitz A, Van Tosh A et al (1985) Quantitative assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:359–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergstra A, van Dijk RB, Hillege HL et al (1995) Assumed oxygen consumption based on calculation from dye dilution cardiac output: an improved formula. Eur Heart J 16:698–703

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Binotto MA, Redington AN (2009) Assessment of the pulmonary circulation in patients with functionally univentricular physiology. Cardiol Young 19:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan KL, Currie PJ, Seward JB et al (1987) Comparison of three Doppler ultrasound methods in the prediction of pulmonary artery pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 9:549–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Curtiss EI, Reddy PS, O’Toole JD et al (1976) Alterations of right ventricular systolic time intervals by chronic pressure and volume overloading. Circulation 53:997–1003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farzaneh-Far R, McKeown BH, Dang D et al (2008) Accuracy of Doppler-estimated pulmonary vascular resistance in patients before liver transplantation. Am J Cardiol 101:259–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Görgülü S, Eren M, Yıldırım A et al (2003) A new echocardiographic approach in assessing pulmonary vascular bed in patients with congenital heart disease: pulmonary artery stiffness―original investigation. Antol J Cardiol 3:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grifka RG (2008) Cardiac catheterization and angiography. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF (eds) Moss and Adam’s heart disease in infants, children and adolescents, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York, pp 208–237

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hadad F, Zamanian R, Beroud AS et al (2009) A novel non-invasive method of estimating pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardigr 22:523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirschfeld S, Meyer R, Schwartz DC et al (1975) The echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Circulation 52:642–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ihlen H, Amlie JP, Dale J et al (1984) Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 51:54–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kouzu H, Nakatani S, Kyotani S et al (2009) Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance by Doppler echocardiography in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol 103:872–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. LaFarge CG, Miettinen OS (1976) The estimation of oxygen consumption. Cardiovasc Res 4:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindahl SGE (1989) Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide elimination in infants and children during anaesthesia and surgery. Br J Anaesth 62:70–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes AA, O’Leary PW (2009) Measurement, interpretation and use of hemodynamic parameters. Cardiol Young 19:8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lundell BPW, Casas ML, Wallgren CG (1996) Oxygen consumption in infants and children during heart catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 17:207–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mastuda M, Sekiguchi T, Sugishita Y et al (1986) Reliability of non-invasive estimation of pulmonary hypertension by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Heart 56:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakahata Y, Hiraishi S, Oowada N et al (2009) Quantitative assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance and reactivity in children with pulmonary hypertension due to congenital heart disease using a noninvasive method: new Doppler-derived indexes. Pediatr Cardiol 30:232–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Okamoto M, Miyatake K, Kinoshita N et al (1984) Analysis of blood flow in pulmonary hypertension with the pulsed Doppler flow meter combined with cross sectional echocardiography. Br Heart J 51:407–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Riggs T, Hirschfeld S, Borkat G et al (1978) Assessment of pulmonary vascular bed by echocardiographic right ventricular systolic time intervals. Circulation 57:939–947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scapellato F, Temporelli PL, Eleuteri E et al (2001) Accurate noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1813–1819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shanahan CL, Wilson NJ, Gentles TL, Skinner J (2003) The influence of measured versus assumed uptake of oxygen in assessing pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with a bidirectional Glenn anastomosis. Cardiol Young 13:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shandus R, Weinberg C, Ivy DD (2001) Development of a noninvasive ultrasound color M-mode means of estimating pulmonary vascular resistance in pediatric pulmonary hypertension: mathematical analysis, in vitro validation, and preliminary clinical studies. Circulation 104(8):908–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Viswanathan S, Kumar RK (2008) Assessment of operability of congenital cardiac shunts with increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:665–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vlahos AP, Feinstein JA, Schiller NB et al (2008) Extension of Doppler-derived echocardiographic measures of pulmonary vascular resistance to patients with moderate or severe pulmonary vascular disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:711–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkinson JL (2001) Congenital heart disease: haemodynamic calculations in the catheter laboratory. Heart 85:113–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yilmaz KS, Schulze-Neick I, Wellnhofer E et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging guided catheterization for assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Heart 91:1064–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Vice Chancellor for Research of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. We thank K. Shashok (AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for improving the use of English in the manuscript and M. Gholami for research assistance. The investigators thank A. R. Mirahmadizadeh, epidemiologist, and H. Tabesh, biostatistics, for providing statistical analysis of the data. We also thank S. Akbarzadeh for secretarial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gholam Hossein Ajami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ajami, G.H., Cheriki, S., Amoozgar, H. et al. Accuracy of Doppler-Derived Estimation of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Congenital Heart Disease: An Index of Operability. Pediatr Cardiol 32, 1168–1174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-011-0035-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-011-0035-4

Keywords

Navigation