Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal Anomalies Influence Parental Treatment Decisions in Relation to Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the variables that influence parental treatment decisions after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). The authors reviewed all cases of prenatally diagnosed structural CHD from August 1998 to December 2006 at their center. The following variables were studied as potential predictors of parental intent to treat: maternal age, race, insurance status, obstetric history, fetal gender, univentricular versus biventricular cardiac physiology, and fetal chromosomal abnormality. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In the review, 252 consecutive cases of prenatally diagnosed CHD were identified. Of these, 204 women pursued full medical treatment, whereas 25 women sought termination of pregnancy or comfort care. Parental intent to treat was unknown for 23 cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified fetal chromosomal abnormality as the only variable that influenced parental intent to treat (odds ratio [OR], 14.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.28–62.66; p = 0.0006). An associated chromosomal abnormality rather than the severity of the heart defect influences the decision to choose termination of pregnancy or comfort care for a fetus with prenatally diagnosed CHD. Women were 14 times more likely to terminate a pregnancy or seek comfort care for a fetus with CHD if a chromosomal abnormality was present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allan LD, Huggon IC (2004) Counselling following a diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 24:1136–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allan LD, Sharland GK, Milburn A, Lockhart SM, Groves AM, Anderson RH, Cook AC, Fagg NL (1994) Prospective diagnosis of 1, 006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:1452–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews RE, Simpson JM, Sharland GK, Sullivan ID, Yates RW (2006) Outcome after preterm delivery of infants antenatally diagnosed with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 148:213–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brick DH, Allan LD (2002) Outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease: an update. Pediatr Cardiol 23:449–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fountain-Dommer RR, Bradley SM, Atz AM, Stroud MR, Forbus GA, Shirali GS (2004) Outcome following, and impact of, prenatal identification of the candidates for the Norwood procedure. Cardiol Young 14:32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (ed) (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 100–103

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kovalchin JP, Silverman NH (2004) The impact of fetal echocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol 25:299–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar RK, Newburger JW, Gauvreau K, Kamenir SA, Hornberger LK (1999) Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus when diagnosis of these two conditions is made only postnatally. Am J Cardiol 83:1649–1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP, Goin JE, Clark BJ (2001) Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 107:1277–1282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Montana E, Khoury MJ, Cragan JD, Sharma S, Dhar P, Fyfe D (1996) Trends and outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations by fetal echocardiography in a well defined birth population, Atlanta, Georgia, 1990–1994. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1805–1809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paladini D, Calabro R, Palmieri S, D’Andrea T (1993) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease and fetal karyotyping. Obstet Gynecol 81(5 Pt 1):679–682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Royston P, Altman DG (1994) Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious modelling. Appl Stat 43:429–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubin DB (ed) (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schafer JL (ed) (1997) Analysis of incomplete multivariate data, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sivanandam S, Glickstein JS, Printz BF, Allan LD, Altmann K, Solowiejczyk DE, Simpson L, Perez-Delboy A, Kleinman CS (2006) Prenatal diagnosis of conotruncal malformations: diagnostic accuracy, outcome, chromosomal abnormalities, and extracardiac anomalies. Am J Perinatol 23:241–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taketazu M, Lougheed J, Yoo SJ, Lim JS, Hornberger LK (2006) Spectrum of cardiovascular disease, accuracy of diagnosis, and outcome in fetal heterotaxy syndrome. Am J Cardiol 97:720–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tennstedt C, Chaoui R, Korner H, Dietel M (1999) Spectrum of congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations associated with chromosomal abnormalities: results of a seven-year necropsy study. Heart 82:34–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH (2001) Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 103:1269–1273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL (1999) Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med 18:681–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn CM (eds) (2000) Multivariate imputation by chained equations: MICE v1.0 user’s manual. Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wapner RJ (2005) Invasive prenatal diagnostic techniques. Semin Perinatol 29:401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yates RS (2004) The influence of prenatal diagnosis on postnatal outcome in patients with structural congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 24:1143–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinai C. Zyblewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zyblewski, S.C., Hill, E.G., Shirali, G. et al. Chromosomal Anomalies Influence Parental Treatment Decisions in Relation to Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 30, 1105–1111 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-009-9514-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-009-9514-2

Keywords

Navigation