Abstract
In this work, we study the problem of mean-variance hedging with a random horizon T∧τ, where T is a deterministic constant and τ is a jump time of the underlying asset price process. We first formulate this problem as a stochastic control problem and relate it to a system of BSDEs with a jump. We then provide a verification theorem which gives the optimal strategy for the mean-variance hedging using the solution of the previous system of BSDEs. Finally, we prove that this system of BSDEs admits a solution via a decomposition approach coming from filtration enlargement theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As commonly done for the integration w.r.t. jump processes, the integral \(\int_{a}^{b}\) stands for ∫(a,b].
The notation BSDE (f,H) holds for the BSDE with generator f and terminal condition H.
References
Arai, T.: An extension of mean-variance hedging to the discontinuous case. Finance Stoch. 9, 129–139 (2005)
Barles, G., Buckdahn, R., Pardoux, E.: Backward Stochastic differential equations and integral-partial differential equations. Stoch. Stoch. Rep. 60(1–2), 57–83 (1997)
Delbaen, F., Schachermayer, W.: The variance-optimal martingale measure for continuous processes. Bernoulli 2, 81–105 (1996)
El Karoui, N., Peng, S., Quenez, M.-C.: Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math. Finance 7(1), 1–71 (1997)
Émery, M.: Équations différentielles stochastiques lipschitziennes: étude de la stabilité. Sém. Prob. (Strasbourg) 13, 281–293 (1979)
Gouriéroux, C., Laurent, J.-P., Pham, H.: Mean-variance Hedging and numéraire. Math. Finance 8, 179–200 (1998)
He, S., Wang, J., Yan, J.: Semimartingale Theory and Stochastic Calculus. Science Press/CRC Press, New-York (1992)
Hu, Y., Imkeller, P., Muller, M.: Utility maximization in incomplete markets. Ann. Probab. 15, 1691–1712 (2004)
Jeanblanc, M., Mania, M., Santacroce, M., Schweizer, M.: Mean-variance hedging via stochastic control and BSDES for general semimartingales. Ann. Appl. Probab. 22(6), 2388–2428 (2012)
Jeulin, T.: Semimartingales et Grossissements D’une Filtration. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 833. Springer, Berlin (1980)
Jeulin, T., Yor, M.: Grossissement de Filtration: Exemples et Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1118. Springer, Berlin (1985)
Kazamaki, N.: Continuous Martingales and BMO. Lectures Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1579. Springer, Berlin (1994)
Kobylanski, M.: Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth. Ann. Probab. 28, 558–602 (2000)
Lim, A.E.B.: Quadratic hedging and mean-variance portfolio selection with random parameters in an incomplete market. Math. Oper. Res. 29, 132–161 (2002)
Lim, A.-E.-B., Zhou, X.-Y.: Mean-variance portfolio selection with random parameters in a complete market. Math. Oper. Res. 27, 101–120 (2002)
Lim, A.-E.-B.: Mean-variance hedging when there are jumps. SIAM J. Control Optim. 44, 1893–1922 (2006)
Laurent, J.-P., Pham, H.: Dynamic programming and mean-variance hedging. Finance Stoch. 3, 83–110 (1999)
Schweizer, M.: Approximation pricing and the variance-optimal martingale measure. Ann. Probab. 64, 206–236 (1996)
Acknowledgements
The research of I.K. benefited from the support of the French ANR research grant LIQUIRISK (ANR-11-JS01-0007).
The research of T.L. benefited from the support of the “Chaire Risque de Crédit”, Fédération Bancaire Française.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 A.1 Proof of Proposition 2.1
We first suppose that X is a nonnegative \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb {G})\)-measurable process. For n≥1, we define the process X n by
Then X n is a bounded \(\mathbb{G}\)-predictable process, and from Lemma 4.4 in [10], there exist a \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{F})\)-measurable process X n,b and a \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{F})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}_{+})\)-measurable process X n,a such that
Since the sequence (X n) n is nondecreasing, we can assume w.l.o.g. that the sequences (X a,n) n and (X b,n) n are also nondecreasing. Define the processes X a and X b by
Then X a is \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{F})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb {R}_{+})\)-measurable and X b is \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{F})\)-measurable and sending n to infinity in (A.1), we get
For a general \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{G})\)-measurable process X, we write X=X +−X − where X +=max(X,0) and X −=max(−X,0) and we apply the previous result to the nonnegative processes X + and X −. From the linear stability of the decomposition (A.2) we get the result. □
1.2 A.2 BMO Stability
Theorem A.1
Let \(\mathbb{Q}_{1}\) and \(\mathbb{Q}_{2}\) be two probability measures on \((\varOmega,\mathcal{G})\). Let M and N be two continuous \((\mathbb{F},\mathbb{Q}_{1})\)-local martingales with \(N\in\rm{BMO}(\mathbb{Q}_{1})\). Suppose that \(\mathbb{Q}_{1}\) and \(\mathbb{Q}_{2}\) are equivalent with \({d\mathbb{Q}_{2}\over d\mathbb{Q}_{1}} |_{\mathcal{F}_{T}}={\mathcal{E}}(N)_{T}\). If \(M\in\rm {BMO}(\mathbb{Q}_{1})\) then \(M-\langle M,N\rangle\in\rm{BMO}(\mathbb{Q}_{2})\).
Proof
This result is a direct consequence of Theorem 3.6 in [12]. □
1.3 A.3 An Estimate for Conditional Moments
Proposition A.1
Let A be a continuous increasing \(\mathbb{F}\)-adapted process. Fix a t≥0 such that there exists a constant C>0 satisfying
for any s∈[0,t]. Then, we have for any s∈[0,t] and any p≥1
and
for any \(\delta\in(0,{1\over C})\).
Proof
Let A be a continuous increasing \(\mathbb {F}\)-adapted process satisfying \(\mathbb{E}[A_{t}-A_{s} | \mathcal{F}_{s}] \leq C\) for any s∈[0,t]. We first prove by iteration that \(\mathbb{E} [{|A_{t}-A_{s}|}^{p} | {\mathcal{F}}_{s}]\leq p! |C|^{p}\) for any p≥1.
-
For p=1, we have by assumption \(\mathbb{E}[A_{t}-A_{s} | \mathcal{F}_{s}] \leq C\).
-
Suppose that for some p≥2, we have \(\mathbb{E}[{|A_{t}-A_{s}|}^{p-1} | {\mathcal{F}}_{s}]\leq(p-1)! |C|^{p-1}\). Since A is a continuous increasing \(\mathbb{F}\)-adapted process we have
$$\begin{aligned} {|A_t-A_s|}^{p}=p \int_s^t {|A_t-A_u|}^{p-1} dA_u , \end{aligned}$$for any s∈[0,t]. Consequently we get
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb{E} \bigl[|A_t-A_s|^{p} | \mathcal{F}_s \bigr] = & p \mathbb{E} \biggl[ \int_s^t |A_t-A_u|^{p-1}dA_u \bigg| \mathcal{F}_s \biggr] \\ = & p \mathbb{E} \biggl[ \int_s^t \mathbb{E} \bigl[|A_t-A_u|^{p-1} | \mathcal{F}_u \bigr] dA_u \bigg| \mathcal{F}_s \biggr] \\ \leq& p! |C|^{p-1} \mathbb{E}[ A_t - A_s |\mathcal{F}_s] \\ \leq& p! |C|^p . \end{aligned}$$ -
Since the result holds true for p=1 and for any p≥2 as soon as it holds for p−1, it holds for p, we get
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb{E} \bigl[{|A_t-A_s |}^{p} | { \mathcal{F}}_s\bigr]\leq p! |C|^{p} , \end{aligned}$$for any p≥1.
From this last inequality, we get for any \(\delta\in(0, \frac{1}{C})\)
which is the expected result. □
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kharroubi, I., Lim, T. & Ngoupeyou, A. Mean-Variance Hedging on Uncertain Time Horizon in a Market with a Jump. Appl Math Optim 68, 413–444 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-013-9213-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-013-9213-5