Skip to main content
Log in

Endosulfan Application to a Stream Mesocosm: Studies on Fate, Uptake into Passive Samplers and Caged Toxicity Test with the Fish M. ambigua

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model mesocosm system was used to simulate the effect of endosulfan entering a waterway from episodic events such as accidental overspray or in runoff water containing contaminated sediment following storm events. The fate of technical endosulfan applied to a 24-stream mesocosm was compared in experiments where the pesticide was applied either directly as water contamination or after being pre-bound to sediment. The flow of water through the streams was discontinued for a 10–12 h period following the pesticide application. Following the water application, only approximately 3% of endosulfan remained in the streams after 4 days and then was not detectable after 7 days. In contrast, after application pre-bound to sediment, approximately 33% of the endosulfan remained in the streams after 4 days and 14% after 7 days. Additionally, with the sediment-bound application, the proportion of endosulfan was higher in the substrate (11%) after 7 days than in the overlying water (3%), and approximately 1% was oxidised to the sulphate form. The dissipation of endosulfan in the water column of both experiments followed a two-parameter exponential decay model characterised by a relatively fast first-order single-phase process. In sediment of both experiments and the gravel of the sediment-dosing experiment, the dissipation of endosulfan followed more closely a four-parameter bi-exponential decay model characterised by first-order kinetics of two fractions: the first fraction dissipates quickly, and in the longer term the second fraction dominates the overall dissipation with a slower rate. In the gravel section of the water-dosing experiment, endosulfan dissipation was characterised by relatively very slow two-parameter exponential decay. The overall dissipation rates of the α- and β-endosulfan isomers were significantly higher in the water-dosing than in the sediment-dosing experiment, except in the gravel section of the mesocosm. The uptake of the endosulfan into passive samplers constructed from polyethylene membrane bags containing trimethylpentane solvent (TRIMPS) placed in the overlying water was linear. In contrast, TRIMPS buried in sediment failed to uptake endosulfan from the sediment substrate, indicating that short-term deployment of passive samplers can only be used to determine time-weighted average concentrations of bioavailable chemicals in the water column. A 34-h LC50 of 2.8 μg/l [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–4.2 μg/l] for juveniles of the native fish Macquaria ambigua was obtained when exposed during the water-dosing experiment. This study demonstrated that the pulse entry of sediment contaminated with endosulfan into a receiving waterway was more persistent compared with direct aqueous contamination and the endosulfan would be bioavailable to pelagic organisms following a gradual partitioning to the water column.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANZECC and ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. National water quality management strategy, vol 1—guidelines. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Canberra, ACT, Australia. Available from http://www.mincos.gov.au/publications/australian_and_new_zealand_guidelines_for_fresh_and_marine_water_quality

  • Cooper B (1996) Central and North West regions water quality program: 1995/96 report on pesticide monitoring. Report TS96.048. Department of Land and Water Conservation, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV (1997) Trimmed Spearman–Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 11:714–719 Correction (1978) 12:417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Lim RP, Hyne RV, Pablo F (2002) A pulse of endosulfan-contaminated sediment affects macroinvertebrates in artificial streams. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 51:44–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Lim RP, Hyne RV, Pablo F (2003a) Short-term exposure to aqueous endosulfan affects macroinvertebrate assemblages. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56:282–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Lim RP, Hyne RV (2003b) The transport, fate and effects of endosulfan in the Australian freshwater environment. Australas J Ecotoxicol 9:101–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huckins JN, Petty JD, Orazio CE, Lebo JA, Clark RC, Gibson VL, Gala WR, Echols KR (1999) Determination of uptake kinetics (sampling rates) by lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water. Environ Sci Technol 33:3918–3923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyne RV, Pablo F, Aistrope M, Leonard A, Ahmad N (2004) Comparison of time-integrated pesticide concentrations determined from field deployed passive samplers with daily river water extractions. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2090–2098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jergentz S, Mugni H, Bonetto C, Schulz R (2004) Runoff-related endosulfan contamination and aquatic macroinvertebrate response in rural basins near Buenos Aires, Argentina. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46:345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamrin MA (ed) (1977) Pesticide profiles: toxicity, environmental impact, and fate. CRC, Florida, USA

  • Kennedy IR, Sánchez-Bayo F, Kimber SW, Hugo L, Ahmad N (2001) Off-site movement of endosulfan from irrigated cotton in New South Wales. J Environ Qual 30:683–696

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laabs V, Amelung W, Pinto A, Zech W (2002a) Fate of pesticides in tropical soils of Brazil under field conditions. J Environ Qual 31:256–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laabs V, Amelung W, Fent G, Zech W, Kubiak R (2002b) Fate of 14C-labeled soybean and corn pesticides in tropical soils of Brazil under laboratory conditions. J Agric Food Chem 50:4619–4627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laabs V, Wehrhan A, Pinto A, Dores E, Amelung W (2007) Pesticide fate in tropical wetlands of Brazil: an aquatic microcosm study under semi-field conditions. Chemosphere 67:975–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AW, Hyne RV, Lim RP, Leigh KA, Le J, Beckett R (2001) Fate and toxicity of endosulfan in the Namoi River water and bottom sediment. J Environ Qual 30:750–759

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AW, Hyne RV, Pablo F (2002) Trimethylpentane-containing passive samplers for predicting time-integrated concentrations of pesticides in water: laboratory and field studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2591–2599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leys JF, Larney FJ, Müller JF, Raupach MR, McTainsh GH, Lynch AW (1998) Anthropogenic dust and endosulfan emissions on a cotton farm in northern New South Wales, Australia. Sci Total Environ 220:55–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens R (1976) Degradation of [8,9-14C] endosulfan by soil microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:853–858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens R (1977) Degradation of endosulfan-8,9-14C in soil under different conditions. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 17:438–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muschal M (1997) Central and North West regions water quality program: 1996/97 report on pesticide monitoring. Report CNR97.063. Department of Land and Water Conservation, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier GM, Fairwather PG, Scott AC (1998) Records of fish kills in inland waters of NSW and Queensland in relation to cotton pesticides. Wetlands (Aust) 17:60–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Nose K (1987) A multi-site decay model for pesticides in soil. J Pestic Sci 12:505–508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SM, Batley GE (1993) The fate of endosulfan in aquatic ecosystems. Environ Pollut 82:143–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Briggs PR, Ford PW, Leys PW, Muschal M, Cooper B, Edge VE (2001) Endosulfan transport: 1. Integrative assessment of airborne and waterborne pathways. J Environ Qual 30:714–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaliūnas D, Lazutka J, Sabaliūniene I, Södergren A (1998) Use of semipermeable membrane devices for studying effects of organic pollutants: comparison of pesticide uptake by semipermeable membrane devices and mussels. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1815–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz R (2001) Comparison of spray drift- and runoff-related input of azinphos-methyl and endosulfan from fruit orchards into the Lourens River, South Africa. Chemosphere 45:543–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivaramaiah HM, Sanchez-Bayo F, Al-Rifai J, Kennedy IR (2005) The fate of endosulfan in water. J Environ Sci Health B40:711–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NC, Dasgupta TP, Roberts EV, Mansingh A (1991) Dynamics of pesticides in tropical conditions 1. Kinetic studies of volatilization, hydrolysis, and photolysis of dieldrin and α and β-endosulfan. J Agric Food Chem 39:575–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderam RIM, Cheng DMH, Thompson GB (1992) Toxicity of endosulfan to native and introduced fish in Australia. Environ Toxicol Chem 11:1469–1476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin CDS (ed) (2003) The pesticide manual: a world compendium, 13th edn. British Corp Protection Council, UK

  • Vinturella AE, Burgess RM, Coull BA, Thompson KM, Shine JP (2004) Use of passive samplers to mimic the uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by benthic polychaetes. Environ Sci Technol 38:1154–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan MT, Kuo J, Pasternak J (2005) Residues of endosulfan and other selected organochlorine pesticides in farm areas of the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Canada. J Environ Qual 34:1186–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the input of the reviewers who undoubtedly improved the manuscript. We thank the following for their help with liquid extractions in the field and data processing: Anne-Maree Mulhall, Kellie Leigh, David Everett and Geoff Gordon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross V. Hyne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pablo, F., Hyne, R.V. Endosulfan Application to a Stream Mesocosm: Studies on Fate, Uptake into Passive Samplers and Caged Toxicity Test with the Fish M. ambigua . Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56, 525–535 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9251-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9251-1

Keywords

Navigation