Skip to main content
Log in

New potential solutions for the chemolysis of urinary phosphate calculi determined by an in vitro study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To find a more efficient solution for chemolysis of urinary calculi, several organic acids were chosen to form solutions by consulting the composition of a classic solution, Suby G. The solutions together with Renacidin, another classic solution, were designed to react with the 4 phosphate components of urinary stone. The processes were real-time measured and analysed by a focused beam reflectance measurement, and the efficiency factors were investigated and discussed in detail. The results show that several organic acids, e.g. hydroxyacetic acid, lactic acid and α-ketoglutaric acid, are more efficient than citric acid in dissolving urinary phosphate calculus. The new solutions containing the organic acids are promising for improving chemolysis treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Evan AP, Lingeman JE (2010) Brushite stone disease as a consequence of lithotripsy? Urol Res 38:293–299

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson WG (2006) Is prevention of stone recurrence financially worthwhile? Urol Res 34:157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63:1817–1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearle MSPY (1996) Renal calculi: a practical approach to medical evaluation and management. In: Andreucci VEFL (ed) International yearbook of nephrology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 69–80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schubert G (2006) Stone analysis. Urol Res 34:146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearle MSPY (1996) Renal calculi: A practical approach to medical evaluation and management. In: Andreucci VEFL (ed) International yearbook of nephrology. Oxford University Press, New York, p 69

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silverman DE, Stamey TA (1983) Management of infection stones: the Stanford experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 62:44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Suby HIAF (1943) Dissolution of phosphatic urinary calculi by the retrograde introduction of a citrate solution containing magnesium. NEJM 228:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulvaney WP (1959) A new solvent for certain urinary calculi: a preliminary report. J Urol 82:546–548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dretler SP, Pfister RC, Newhouse JH (1979) Renal-stone dissolution via percutaneous nephrostomy. N Engl J Med 300:341–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Comarr AE, Kawaichi GK, Morris L, Bors E (1971) Dissolution of renal stones by renacidin in patients with spinal cord injury. Proc Veterans Adm Spinal Cord Inj Conf 18:174–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suby HI (1952) Dissolution of urinary calculi. J Urol 68:96–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez RD, Whiting BM, Canales BK (2012) The history of kidney stone dissolution therapy: 50 years of optimism and frustration with renacidin. J Endourol 26:110–118

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiang-bo Z, Zhi-ping W, Jian-min D, Jian-zhong L, Bao-liang M (2005) New chemolysis for urological calcium phosphate calculi—a study in vitro. BMC Urol 5:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suby HI (1944) Dissolution of urinary calculi. Proc R Soc Med 37:609–620

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs D, Heimbach D, Hesse A (2001) Chemolysis of struvite stones by acidification of artificial urine—an in vitro study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 35:345–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou GY, Power G, Barrett M, Glennon B, Morris G, Zhao Y (2014) Development and characterization of a single stage mixed-suspension, mixed-product-removal crystallization process with a novel transfer unit. Cryst Growth Des 14:1782–1793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li HY, Kawajiri Y, Grover MA, Rousseau RW (2014) Application of an empirical FBRM model to estimate crystal size distributions in batch crystallization. Cryst Growth Des 14:607–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21276091), Ph.D. Programmes Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 20120172110010) and Science and Technology Planning Project Foundation of Zhongshan (No. 2014A1FC120) are greatly appreciated.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunxiao Liu or Yanbin Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Wang, S., Hong, J. et al. New potential solutions for the chemolysis of urinary phosphate calculi determined by an in vitro study. Urolithiasis 43, 147–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0745-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0745-1

Keywords

Navigation