Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheath

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present our experience with the use of the ureteral access sheath for the management of small impacted lower third ureteral stones, in comparison with more standard techniques. Ninety-eight consecutive patients, aged 18–73 years (mean 48.5), with small (diameter < or =10 mm) impacted lower third ureteral stones (<5 mm in 56, and 5–10 mm in 42 patients) were randomly managed with either a 12/14F coaxial ureteral dilator/sheath and a 7.5F flexible ureteroscope (group A; 48 patients), or with balloon dilatation and the 7.5F flexible ureteroscope (group B; 50 patients). In both groups, stones were grasped and extracted with a basket, and when necessary they were disintegrated with a 1.9F electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) probe. Postoperatively, excretory urography was performed at 1 month and patients were followed-up for 1 year. The mean operative time was 45.5 min in group A, and 58.5 min in group B (P<0.05). EHL was performed in 16 (33.3%) patients of group A, and in 12 (24%) patients of group B. In group B, balloon dilatation was performed in 28 (56%) patients. Ureteral perforation was revealed in 4 (8%) patients of group B. The follow-up imaging tests showed stone-free status in 46 (95.8%) patients of group A and in all (100%) patients of group B. No long-term complications were recorded. Endoscopic management of small impacted lower third ureteral stones with the ureteral access sheath is a quicker and safer procedure, in comparison with the more standard approach, bearing comparable efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgentaler A, Bridge SS, Dretler SP (1990) Management of the impacted ureteral calculus. J Urol 143:263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ather MH, Paryani J, Memon A et al (2001) A 10-year experience of managing ureteric calculi: changing trends towards endourological intervention—is there a role for open surgery? BJU Int 88:173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mugiya S, Nagata M, Un-No T et al (2000) Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor. J Urol 164:329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearle MS, Nadler R, Bercowsky E et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 166:1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang CP, Huang SH, Tai HL et al (2001) Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy. J Endourol 15:563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG et al (2002) Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J Urol 167:1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pardalidis NP, Smith AD (1995) Mechanical techniques and meatotomy for ureteral dilation. In: Smith AD (ed) Controversies in endourology. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML et al (1997) Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol 157:28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Monga M, Bhayani S, Landman J et al (2001) Ureteral access for upper unirary tract disease: the access sheath. J Endourol 15:831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165:789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Monga M, Bodie J, Ercole B (2004) Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures. Urology 64:439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Monga M, Gawlik A, Durfee W (2004) Systemic evaluation of ureteral access sheaths. Urology 63:834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu NZ, Auge BK, Preminger GM (2001) Simplified ureteral stent placement with the assistance of a ureteral access sheath. J Urol 166:206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elashry OM, DiMeglio RB, Nakada SY et al (1996) Intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral and renal calculi using small caliber (1.9F) electrohydraulic lithotripsy probes. J Urol 156:1581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yagisawa T, Kobayashi C, Ishikawa N et al (2001) Benefits of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones. J Endourol 15:697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. De Sio M, Autorino R, Damiano R et al (2004) Expanding applications of the access sheath to ureterolithotripsy of distal ureteral stones. A frustrating experience. Urol Int 72(Suppl 1):55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vanlangendonck R, Landman J (2004) Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheaths. Urol Clin North Am 31:71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okeke Z, Lam JS, Gupta M (2004) Use of a ureteral access sheath to facilitate removal of large stone burden during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 63:574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Auge BK, Wu NZ, Pietrow PK et al (2003) Ureteral access sheath facilitates inspection of incision of ureteroplevic junction. J Urol 169:1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD et al (2004) Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 18:33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasios G. Papatsoris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pardalidis, N.P., Papatsoris, A.G., Kapotis, C.G. et al. Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheath. Urol Res 34, 211–214 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-006-0044-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-006-0044-6

Keywords

Navigation