Skip to main content
Log in

Prevention of retrograde calculus migration with the Stone Cone

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retrograde calculus migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy remains a problem in 5–40% of cases. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the Stone Cone device, in comparison with the standard flat wire basket. A total of 56 consecutive patients with ureteral calculi, suitable for ureteroscopic extraction and/or lithotripsy, where included in this prospective study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In group A (30 patients), we used the Stone Cone, while in group B (26 patients) we used the standard flat wire basket. The Stone Cone was placed through a cystoscope under fluoroscopic guidance, or when necessary under direct ureteroscopic control. Whenever necessary, intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy took place in both groups. Statistical significance was assessed by the paired t-test. The mean operative time was 48.5 min in group A, and 42.4 min in group B. Intact calculus extraction was possible in 16.6% in group A, and in 7.6% in group B (P<0.01). Retrograde stone migration was revealed in 23% in group B only (P<0.001). Also, residual fragments >3 mm were recorded in 30.7% in group B only (P<0.001). None of the patients in group A required auxiliary procedures, in contrary to 23% in group B (P<0.001). No major complications were recorded in group A, while in group B a case of major ureteral mucosal abrasion was recorded. The Stone Cone is safe and efficient in preventing retrograde stone migration and in minimizing residual fragments during ureteroscopic lithotripsy in comparison with the flat wire basket.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al. (1997) Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158: 1915

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dretler SP (2000) Ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi: prevention of stone migration. J Endourol 14: 565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Gabry EA, Bagley DH (1999) Retrieval capabilities of different stone basket designs in vitro. J Endourol 13: 305

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delvecchio FD, Kuo RL, Preminger GM (2000) Clinical efficacy of combined Lithoclast and Lithovac stone removal during ureteroscopy. J Urol 164: 40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dretler SP (2001) The stone cone: new generation of basketry. J Urol 165: 1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knispel HH, Klan R, Heicappell R et al. (1998) Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: results in 143 patients. J Endourol 12: 513

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert M, Bennani A, Guiter J et al. (1994) Treatment of 150 ureteric calculi with the Lithoclast. Eur Urol 26:212–215

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desai MR, Patel S, Sabnis R et al. (2001) First clinical trial of the Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent migration and allow safe extraction. J Urol 165 [Suppl]: 1480A

  9. Desai MR, Patel S, Sabnis R et al. (2002) The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience. J Urol 167: 1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leslie SW (2002) Re: The stone cone: a new generation of basketry. J Urol 167: 1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smit M, Verhagen PC (2004) Preventing stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy be using the stone cone. BJU Int 94:671–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. P. Pardalidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pardalidis, N.P., Papatsoris, A.G. & Kosmaoglou, E.V. Prevention of retrograde calculus migration with the Stone Cone. Urol Res 33, 61–64 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-004-0453-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-004-0453-3

Keywords

Navigation