Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Method Distinguishes Between Mutation Rates and Fixation Biases in Patterns of Single-Nucleotide Substitution

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 February 2006

Abstract

Analysis of the genome-wide patterns of single-nucleotide substitution reveals that the human GC content structure is out of equilibrium. The substitutions are decreasing the overall GC content (GC), at the same time making its range narrower. Investigation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) revealed that presently the decrease in GC content is due to a uniform mutational preference for A:T pairs, while its projected range is due to a variability in the fixation preference for G:C pairs. However, it is important to determine whether lessons learned about evolutionary processes operating at the present time (that is reflected in the SNP data) can be extended back into the evolutionary past. We describe here a new approach to this problem that utilizes the juxtaposition of forward and reverse substitution rates to determine the relative importance of variability in mutation rates and fixation probabilities in shaping long-term substitutional patterns. We use this approach to demonstrate that the forces shaping GC content structure over the recent past (since the appearance of the SNPs) extend all the way back to the mammalian radiation ∼90 million years ago. In addition, we find a small but significant effect that has not been detected in the SNP data—relatively high rates of C:G→A:T germline mutation in low-GC regions of the genome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt PF, Petrov DA, Hwa T (2003) Distinct changes of genomic biases in nucleotide substitution at the time of mammalian radiation. Mol Biol Evol 20:1887–1896

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt PF, Hwa T, Petrov DA (2005) Substantial regional variation in substitution rates in the human genome: importance of GC content, gene density, and telomere-specific effects. J Mol Evol 60:748–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi G (1993) The vertebrate genome: isochores and evolution. Mol Biol Evol 10:186–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi G (2000) Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. Gene 241:3–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsell JA (2002) Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution. Mol Biol Evol 19:1181–1197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galtier N, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L (2001) GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics 159:907–911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH (1998) Population genetics: a concise guide. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Graur D, Li W–H (2000) Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Ma

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lercher MJ, Hurst LD (2002) Can mutation or fixation biases explain the allele frequency distribution of human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)? Gene 300:53–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lercher MJ, Smith NG, Eyre-Walker A, Hurst LD (2002) The evolution of isochores: evidence from SNP frequency distributions. Genetics 162:1805–1810

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier J, Duret L (2004) Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol 21:984–990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Press WH (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer SA, Hartl DL (1992) Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics 132:1161–1176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MT, Smith NG (2004) Fixation biases affecting human SNPs. Trends Genet 20:122–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MT, Smith NG, Ellegren H (2003) Compositional evolution of noncoding DNA in the human and chimpanzee genomes. Mol Biol Evol 20:278–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jerel Davis, Nadia Singh, Marc Feldman, Nicolas Galtier, and the two anonymous reviewers for comments that went a long way to improve the manuscript. M.L. is funded by a fellowship from the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation, through the Stanford Graduate Fellowship program. T.H. is grateful for financial support by the NSF through Grants 0211308, 0083704, 0216576, and 0225630. D.P. is grateful for the financial support by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Hellman Faculty Award, Terman Award from the Stanford University, and NSF Grant DEB-0317171.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail Lipatov.

Additional information

Reviewing Editor: Dr. Nicolas Galfier

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-7207-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lipatov, M., Arndt, P.F., Hwa, T. et al. A Novel Method Distinguishes Between Mutation Rates and Fixation Biases in Patterns of Single-Nucleotide Substitution. J Mol Evol 62, 168–175 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-005-0207-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-005-0207-z

Keywords

Navigation