Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social software allows users to communicate and share data through online social interaction using Web 2.0 technology. Three hundred and fifty-six members of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) within the UK and Ireland were invited by e-mail to complete an online survey (e-survey) anonymously on their knowledge and use of Web 2.0 technology and whether they would like this to be used in BAPRAS’s e-Learning for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (e-LPRAS). Fifty-eight members completed the e-survey (response rate of 58 out of 356 or 16.3%). The respondents comprised 52 males (89.7%) and 6 females (10.3%) with a mean age (range) of 44.1 years (24–61). Forty one (70.7%) were consultants and 17 (29.3%) were non-consultants with a mean time (range) at this level of 10.1 years (1–30) and 3.4 years (1–6), respectively. The mean (range) ages of consultants and non-consultants were 48.7 years (35–61) and 32.8 years (24–38), respectively. Fifty-eight (100%) plastic surgeons used the Internet and e-mail, 48 (82.8%) owned a handheld device and 48 (82.8%) owned a digital media player. Sixteen plastic surgeons (27.6%) used instant messaging, 29 (50.0%) used Internet telephone, 12 (20.7%) used videoconferencing, 23 (39.7%) used media sharing, 2 (3.4%) used social bookmarking, 21 (36.2%) used social networking, 24 (41.4%) used forums, 29 (50.0%) used podcasts, 1 (1.7%) contributed to a wiki, 6 (10.3%) wrote a blog and 18 (31.0%) read a blog. Non-consultants were more likely to use social networking and forums than consultants. Forty-one (70.7%) plastic surgeons used e-learning, and 31 (53.4%) would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS, whilst 5 (8.6%) would not and 22 (37.9%) do not know what Web 2.0 technology is. Most respondents either used Web 2.0 technology or were aware of it. Over half of respondents would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS. We recommend that BAPRAS adopts Web 2.0 technology in their development of e-LPRAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CERN (2008) World Wide Web @20. http://info.cern.ch/. Accessed 31 August 2011

  2. O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. O’Reilly. At: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 31 August 2011

  3. Stevens RJG (2011) Do trainees want e-learning in plastic surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:e47–e49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens RJG (2011) Do consultants want e-learning in plastic surgery for continuing professional development and revalidation? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:e50–e52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (2009) e-Learning. At: http://www.bapras.org.uk/page.asp?id=114. Accessed 31 August 2011

  6. British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (2010) e-Learning for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (e-LPRAS). At: http://www.e-lfh.org.uk/projects/e-lpras/. Accessed 31 August 2011

  7. Koch H, Dabernig J, Allert S, Puchinger M, Scharnagl E (2002) Plastic surgeons and the Internet: results of a worldwide survey. Ann Plast Surg 49:466–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Allert S, Adelhard K, Boettcher F, Schweiberer L (2000) Communication in plastic surgery by means of e-mail: experiences and recommendations for clinical use. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:660–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wyatt JC (2000) When to use web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:426–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J (2002) Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res 4:E13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH (2004) Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2). J Med Internet Res 6:e39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elkwood A, Matarasso A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M, Godek CP (2001) National plastic surgery survey: brow lifting techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2143–2150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matarasso A, Elkwood A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M (2000) National plastic surgery survey: face lift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1185–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mirzabeigi MN, Moore JH Jr, Mericli AF, Bucciarelli P, Jandali S, Valerio IL, Stofman GM (2011) Current trends in vaginal labioplasty: a survey of plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820d6867

  15. Phillips BT, Wang ED, Mirrer J, Lanier ST, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT (2011) Current practice among plastic surgeons of antibiotic prophylaxis and closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction: experience, evidence, and implications for postoperative care. Ann Plast Surg 66:460–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavijo-Alvarez JA, Pannucci CJ, Oppenheimer AJ, Wilkins EG, Rubin JP (2011) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in body contouring surgery: a national survey of 596 ASPS surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 66:228–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S (2009) Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:MR000008

  18. Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sandars J, Homer M, Pell G, Croker T (2008) Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Med Teach 30:308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandars J, Schroter S (2007) Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgrad Med J 83:759–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ofcom (2010) The communications market 2010: UK. A third of UK consumers now use an MP3 player/iPod, with personal use highest in Northern Ireland. At: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/cmr-10/UKCM-3.50.html. Accessed 31 August 2011

  22. Office for National Statistics (2007) The digital age. Use of ICT at home. At: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1710. Accessed 31 August 2011

  23. Ofcom (2010) The communications market 2010: UK. Social networking now accounts for a quarter of all time spent online. At: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/cmr-10/UKCM-4.4.html. Accessed 31 August 2011

  24. Hunter T, Hardwicke J, Rayatt S (2010) The smart phone: an indispensable tool for the plastic surgeon? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:e426–e427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ofcom (2011) The communications market 2011: growth of smartphones and mobile internet use. At: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/telecoms-networks/5.20. Accessed 31 August 2011

  26. Ofcom (2011) The communications market 2011: smartphone brand choice among users. At: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/uk/1.39. Accessed 31 August 2011

  27. Larvin M (2009) E-learning in surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg 79:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (2009) The voice of plastic surgery. At: http://www.bapras.org.uk. Accessed 31 August 2011

  29. Ahn CS, Oneill SP, Maitz PK (2011) Improving accuracy of burn referrals through the use of an internet-based burns chart. Eur J Plast Surg 34(5):331–335

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jones SM, Milroy C, Pickford MA (2004) Telemedicine in acute plastic surgical trauma and burns. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:239–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wallace DL, Jones SM, Milroy C, Pickford MA (2008) Telemedicine for acute plastic surgical trauma and burns. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:31–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wallace DL, Smith RW, Pickford MA (2007) A cohort study of acute plastic surgery trauma and burn referrals using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 13:282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tadros A, Murdoch R, Stevenson JH (2009) Digital image referral for suspected skin malignancy—a pilot study of 300 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1048–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Varkey P, Tan NC, Girotto R, Tang WR, Liu YT, Chen HC (2008) A picture speaks a thousand words: the use of digital photography and the Internet as a cost-effective tool in monitoring free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 60:45–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rees RS, Bashshur N (2007) The effects of TeleWound management on use of service and financial outcomes. Telemed J E Health 13:663–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Varey A (2011) Leg fractures. At: http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/leg-fractures/id406173093?mt=8. Accessed 31 August 2011

  37. JAMB Innovations (2009) uBurn. At: http://itunes.apple.com/app/uburn/id327057175?mt=8. Accessed 31 August 2011

  38. American Medical Association (2010) Archives of facial plastic surgery. At: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/archives-facial-plastic-surgery/id406209849?mt=8. Accessed 31 August 2011

  39. Stockton W, Jaffe W, Ahmad Z (2011) i-PRAS. At: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/i-pras/id445688806?mt=8&ls=1. Accessed 31 August 2011

  40. Oxford English Dictionary (2008) Podcast (noun). Oxford University Press. At: http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/273003. Accessed 31 August 2011

  41. Rohrich RJ (2006) Podcasts on the plastic and reconstructive surgery web site: the journal goes portable and audio. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1071–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Twitter (2011) Twitter. At: http://twitter.com/about. Accessed 31 August 2011

  43. The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2011) RC of Surgeons (RCS_SurgeryNews). At: http://twitter.com/#!/RCS_SurgeryNews. Accessed 31 August 2011

  44. British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (2011) BAAPS Press Office (BAAPSMedia). At: http://twitter.com/#!/BAAPSMedia. Accessed 31 August 2011

  45. European Journal of Plastic Surgery (2011) Eur J Plast Surg. At: http://twitter.com/#!/eurjplastsurg. Accessed 31 August 2011

  46. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2011) PRS (prsjournal). At: http://twitter.com/#!/prsjournal. Accessed 31 August 2011

  47. Facebook (2011) Facebook. At: http://www.facebook.com/. Accessed 24 August 2011

  48. European Journal of Plastic Surgery (2011) European Journal of Plastic Surgery. At: http://www.facebook.com/pages/European-Journal-of-Plastic-Surgery/171098176280255. Accessed 31 August 2011

  49. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2011) Plastic and reconstructive surgery. At: http://www.facebook.com/#!/PRSjournal. Accessed 31 August 2011

  50. British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (2011) British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (Press Office). At: http://www.facebook.com/BritishAssociationofAestheticPlasticSurgeons/. Accessed 31 August 2011

  51. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2011) American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS). At: http://www.facebook.com/AestheticSociety/. Accessed 31 August 2011

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the plastic surgeons who completed this survey, BAPRAS for approving this survey and e-mailing the members and Dr. Neil Scott who is Statistician in the Section of Population Health within the University of Aberdeen for his statistical advice. This research has contributed to a thesis for the degree of the Doctorate of Medicine of the University of Aberdeen.

Conflict of interest

R.J.G.S. is a Junior Member of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS). J.M.O. is the former Chairman of the Education and Research Committee of BAPRAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, AB25 2ZN, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    Roger J. G. Stevens & Michaela P. Davies

  2. Medi-CAL Unit, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    Roger J. G. Stevens & Neil M. Hamilton

  3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK

    Joseph M. O’Donoghue

Authors
  1. Roger J. G. Stevens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil M. Hamilton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph M. O’Donoghue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michaela P. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger J. G. Stevens.

Additional information

This paper was partly presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Burns and Plastic Surgery Section of the Society of Academic and Research Surgery, 5 January, 2012, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevens, R.J.G., Hamilton, N.M., O’Donoghue, J.M. et al. The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons. Eur J Plast Surg 35, 747–755 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation