Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adverse reactions following injection with a permanent facial filler polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid): causes and treatment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid), an atoxic non-immunogenic gel of the non-resorbable type, has gained widespread popularity as an injectable filler for facial augmentation. However, adverse events (AEs) have occurred, the nature of which seems obscure because of negative findings on culture and a pattern of foreign-body response on microscopy.

Design

This is a prospective study of case reports provided by physicians injecting Aquamid during the period 21 May 2001 to 15 September 2003.

Materials

Among 40,000 persons injected, 55 were reported to have experienced AEs. Information from questionnaires distributed along with the product and follow-up information from involved physicians was collected into a database.

Results

AEs occurring mainly in lips and nasolabial folds were reported in 55 patients, with 51 requiring treatment. The time from the last gel injection to the debut of the AE varied from 2 to 364 days, with a median of 12 days. Seventeen patients presented with different types of reaction to the injection, and the exact cause of the AE was established in another 19. A complete follow-up until full recovery was available in only 43 cases (84%). A broad-spectrum antibiotic in high dosage was effective for a short time. Steroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) tended to aggravate symptoms and to prolong treatment time.

Conclusions

AEs presenting clinically as nodules or swellings later than 1 week and less than 1 year after the injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid) should be treated immediately with a broad-spectrum antibiotic (quinolone) in high dosage. Steroids or NSAIDs are contraindicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen O (1992) Response to subdermal implantation of textured microimplants in humans. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergeret-Galley C, Latouche X, Illouz Y-G (2001) The value of a new filler material in corrective and cosmetic surgery: DermaLive and DermaDeep. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollen L (2000) Intracutaneous test in the rabbit. Scantox, Denmark (Lab. No. 40771)

  4. Boye K, Hogdall E, Borre M (1999) Identification of bacteria using two degenerate 16S rDNA sequencing primers. Microbiol Res 154:23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Breiting V, Aasted A, Jørgensen A, Opitz P, Rosetzsky A (2004) A study on patients treated with polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for facial corrections. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen LC, Breiting VB, Aasted A, Jørgensen A, Kebuladze I (2003) Long term effects of polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG, Interfall/Contura SA) in human breast tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duranti F, Salti G, Bovani B (1998) Injectable hyaluronic acid for soft tissue augmentation: a clinical and histological study. Dermatol Surg 24:1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ersek RA, Beisang AA (1991) Bioplastique: a new textured copolymer microparticle promotes permanence in soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 33:693

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hennekes R, Garus HJ (1989) Orbitale spätkomplikationen nach subkutaner silikoninjektion. Fortschr Ophthalmol 86:249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemperle G, Gauthier-Hazan N, Lemperle M (1998) PMMA microspheres (Artecol) for long lasting correction of wrinkles: Part III. Refinements and statistics. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2:356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemperle G, Romano JJ, Busso M (2003) Soft tissue augmentation with Artecol I: 10-year history, indications, technique and complications. Dermatol Surg 29:573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lupton JR, Alster TS (2000) Cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction to injectable hyaluronic acid. Dermatol Surg 26:135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maas CS, Papel ID, Greene D, Stoker DA (1997) Complications of injectable synthetic polymers in facial augmentation. Dermatol Surg 23:871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCollister DD, Hake CL, Sadek SE, Rowe VK (1965) Toxicological investigations of polyacrylamides. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 7:639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendez-Eastman SK (2003) BOTOX: a review. Plast Surg Nurs 23:64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Netscher DT, Weizer G, Wigoda P, Walker LE, Thornby J, Bowen D (1995) Clinical relevance of positive breast periprosthetic cultures without overt infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearl RM, Laub DR, Kaplan EN (1978) Complications following silicone injections for augmentation of the contour of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rapaport MJ, Vinnik C, Zarem H (1996) Injectable silicone: cause of facial nodules, cellulites, ulceration and migration. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Requena C, Izquierdo MJ, Navarro M, Martinez A, Vilata JJ, Botella R, Amorrortu J, Sabater V, Aliaga A, Requena L (2001) Adverse reactions to injectable aesthetic microimplants. Am J Dermatol 23:197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rudolph CM, Soyer P, Schuller-Petrovic S, Kerl H (1999) Foreign body granulomas due to injectable aesthetic microimplants. Am J Surg Pathol 23:113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith EA, Oehma FW (1991) Acrylamide and polyacrylamide: a review of production, use, environmental fate and neurotoxicity. Rev Environ Health 9:215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stegman SJ, Chu S, Armstrong RC (1998) Adverse reactions to bovine collagen implant: clinical and histologic features. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 14(Suppl 1):39

    Google Scholar 

  23. Travis WD, Balough K, Abraham JL (1985) Silicone granulomas: report of three cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 16:19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Virden CP, Dobke MK, Stein P (1992) Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Webster RC, Fuleihan NS, Hamdan US, Fuleihan NS, Giandello PR, Smith RC (1986) Injectable silicone: report of 17,000 facial treatments since 1962. Am J Cosmet Surg 3:41

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkie TF (1977) Late development of granuloma after liquid silicone injections. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ieva Ankorina-Stark, M.Sc., Ph.D. and Professor Henrik Enghusen Poulsen, M.D., Ph.D., are gratefully acknowledged for valuable comments and recommendations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Lise Christensen

  2. Holte Clinic of Plastic Surgery, Holte, Denmark

    Vibeke Breiting

  3. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Jens Vuust

  4. Department of Virus, Hormones and Cancer, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Estrid Hogdall

  5. Department of Pathology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Lise Christensen

Authors
  1. Lise Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vibeke Breiting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Vuust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Estrid Hogdall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lise Christensen.

Additional information

The authors have no relevant financial interest in this study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, L., Breiting, V., Vuust, J. et al. Adverse reactions following injection with a permanent facial filler polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid): causes and treatment. Eur J Plast Surg 28, 464–471 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-005-0005-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-005-0005-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation