Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate breast reconstruction: who is more satisfied, the surgeon or the patient?

  • EURAPS Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of immediate breast reconstruction from the viewpoint of both the surgeon and the patient. Between 1993 and 2001, 122 patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction. The morphological results were evaluated by the surgical team based on visuals. The patients responded to a questionnaire (77 answers, mean follow up 4.7 years). Both groups gave ratings from 0 to 10. The ratings were compared between the two groups surgeon/patients and according to the mastectomy techniques (Patey versus skin sparing mastectomy) and to the reconstruction techniques (prosthesis versus autologous flaps). There was a difference in the evaluation of the surgeons and the patients; surgeons preferred flaps while the patients favoured a simple technique with prosthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Kroll SS, Wang BG (1994) Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 93(7):1410–1416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Delay E, Gratadour AC, Jorquera F, Zlatoff P, Bremond A (1999) Immediate autologous latissimus breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Eur J Plast Surg 22:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fontet P (1998) Intérêt d’une méthode d’évaluation esthétique du sein reconstruit après cancer. Ann Chir Plast Esth 43(3):217–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frost MH, Schaid DJ, Sellers ThA (2000) Long term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA 284(3):319–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbay JR, Rietjens M (1992) Résultats esthétiques de la reconstruction mammaire après amputation pour cancer- A propos de 323 cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 21(4):405–412

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gauthier-Villars M, Blandy C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D (1999) Pour quelles raisons pourrait-on conseiller une mastectomie prophylactique a une femme a risque? Bull Cancer 86(9):754–759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Janin N (1999) Pour quelles raisons devrait-on se abstenir de conseiller une mastectomie prophylactique chez une femme a risque? Bull Cancer 86(9):760–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroll SS, Marchi M (1992) Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:1045–1051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lejour M, Dome M (1991) Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1054–1068

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME (1992) Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free flap over the conventional TRAM flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(2):225–261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Bruant-Rodier.

Additional information

Presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Plastic Surgeons (EURAPS), Vienna, Austria, May 29–31, 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruant-Rodier, C., Mathelin, C., Rodier, J.F. et al. Immediate breast reconstruction: who is more satisfied, the surgeon or the patient?. Eur J Plast Surg 27, 4–7 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0583-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0583-9

Keywords

Navigation