Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for internal carotid artery stenosis

  • INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was examined in patients with restenosis after PTA for carotid stenosis. After percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for 63 cases of internal carotid stenoses 13 cases of restenosis appeared. They were treated by PTA or carotid endarterectomy. The treatment was chosen by the patient after explanation of each treatment. We initially treated seven patients by repeat PTA and six by carotid endarterectomy. The degree of stenosis improved from 82 % to 30 % on average after repeated PTA. However, one patient in the PTA group had restenosis, and carotid endarterectomy was then performed. The other cases also had restenosis and were treated by PTA. The six cases treated by carotid endarterectomy were successfully treated without difficulty. The success rate of PTA was 5/7 (71 %) in the restenosis cases. Patients with a greater residual stenosis after initial PTA had significantly more frequent restenosis. Repeat PTA and CEA both appeared effective treatment for restenosis after initial PTA, although PTA had a restenosis rate similar to that of initial PTA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 21 December 1998 Accepted: 21 July 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terada, T., Tsuura, M., Masuo, O. et al. Treatment of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for internal carotid artery stenosis. Neuroradiology 42, 296–301 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050889

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050889

Navigation