Abstract
Our purpose was to assess the value of routine administration of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA) for cranial MR in a series of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive examinations of 104 patients. All patients underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images. Each radiologist independently assessed first the unenhanced images alone and then the pre- and postinjection images together. Then both reviewed the complete study and produced a consensus report. The history, investigations and management were collated separately and were unknown to the radiologists. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed new focal abnormalities, not seen on the T2-weighted or unenhanced images in 15 (14 %) patients, but almost always in the context of abnormal unenhanced images. In only 2 patients (2 %) did contrast medium reveal abnormalities when the unenhanced study had been considered normal. In only 1 of these (1 %) was the new finding, cytomegalovirus diffuse ependymal enhancement, of clinical importance, although the diagnosis of encephalitis was made on routine examination of cerebrospinal-fluid. The other revealed a toxoplasma lesion in a patient known to have resolving disease. Meningeal disease not suspected on the unenhanced images was shown in 2 patients (2 %). In these case the unenhanced images were abnormal in other respects. Intravenous Gd-DTPA was helpful to the radiologist in making a radiological diagnosis in 11 patients (11 %), usually by improving characterisation of a lesion seen on the unenhanced images. The contribution of intravenous Gd-DTPA in this series does not warrant recommending its use in every case.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 21December 1998 Accepted: 29 December 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malcolm, P., Howlett, D., Saks, A. et al. MRI of the brain in HIV-positive patients: what is the value of routine intravenous contrast medium?. Neuroradiology 41, 687–695 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050825
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050825