Abstract
Introduction
Our objective is to determine the utility of noncontrast Hounsfield unit values, Hounsfield unit values corrected for the patient’s hematocrit, and venoarterial Hounsfield unit difference measurements in the identification of intracranial venous thrombosis on noncontrast head computed tomography.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed noncontrast head computed tomography exams performed in both normal patients and those with cerebral venous thrombosis, acquiring Hounsfield unit values in normal and thrombosed cerebral venous structures. Also, we acquired Hounsfield unit values in the internal carotid artery for comparison to thrombosed and nonthrombosed venous structures and compared the venous Hounsfield unit values to the patient’s hematocrit.
Results
A significant difference is identified between Hounsfield unit values in thrombosed and nonthrombosed venous structures. Applying Hounsfield unit threshold values of greater than 65, a Hounsfield unit to hematocrit ratio of greater than 1.7, and venoarterial difference values greater than 15 alone and in combination, the majority of cases of venous thrombosis are identifiable on noncontrast head computed tomography.
Conclusion
Absolute Hounsfield unit values, Hounsfield unit to hematocrit ratios, and venoarterial Hounsfield unit value differences are a useful adjunct in noncontrast head computed tomographic evaluation of cerebral venous thrombosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coutinho JM, Zuurbier SM, Aramideh M, Stam J (2012) The incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis: a cross-sectional study. Stroke 43(12):3375–3377. http://stroke.ahajournal.org/content/early/2012/09/20/STROKEAHA.112.671453.long. Accessed 05 Nov 2012
Ferro JM, Lopes MG, Rosas MJ et al (2005) Delay in hospital admission of patients with cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 19:152–155
Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J et al (2004) Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 35(3):664–670
De Brujin SF, Stam J, Kappelle LJ, De Brujin SF, Stam J, Kappelle LJ (1996) Thunderclap headache as first symptom of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. CVST Study Group. Lancet 348(9042):1623–1625
Ferro JM, Canhao P, Bousser MG et al (2005) Cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis in the elderly. Stroke 3(9):1927–1932
Linn J, Pfefferkorn T, Ivanicova K et al (2009) Noncontrast CT in deep cerebral venous thrombosis and sinus thrombosis: comparison of its diagnostic value for both entities. Am J Neuroradiol 30:728–735
Rizzo L, Crasto SG, Ruda R et al (2010) Cerebral venous thrombosis: role of CT, MRI and MRA in the emergency setting. Radiol Med 115(2):313–325
Tang PH, Chai J, Chan YH et al (2008) Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis: subtle signs on neuroimaging. Ann Acad Med Singapore 37:397–401
Buyck PJ, De Keyzer F, Vanneste D, Wilms G, Thils V, Demaerel P (2013) CT density measurement and H:H ratio are useful in diagnosing acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Am J Neuroradiol. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3469
Black DF, Rad AE, Gray LA et al (2011) Cerebral venous sinus density on noncontrast CT correlates with hematocrit. Am J Neuroradiol 32:1354–1357
Fanous R, Leung L, Karlik S (2010) Quantitative assessment of the superior sagittal sinus on unenhanced computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 75:336–342
Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:1158–1192
Kozic D, Zarkov M, Semnic RR et al (2010) Overlooked early CT signs of cerebral venous thrombosis with lethal outcome. Acta Neurol Belg 110(4):345–348
Provenzale JM, Kranz PG (2011) Dural sinus thrombosis: sources of error in image interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 196:23–31
Roland T, Jacobs J, Rappaport A et al (2010) Unenhanced brain CT is useful to decide on further imaging in suspected venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Radiol 65:34–39
Kamal MK (2006) Computed tomographic imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis. J Pak Med Assoc 56(11):519–522
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States government. I am a military service member. This work was prepared as part of my official duties. Title 17, USC, §105 provides that 'Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S.Government.' Title 17, USC, §101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person's official duties.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Besachio, D.A., Quigley, E.P., Shah, L.M. et al. Noncontrast computed tomographic Hounsfield unit evaluation of cerebral venous thrombosis: a quantitative evaluation. Neuroradiology 55, 941–945 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1194-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1194-1