Skip to main content
Log in

Implicating the long styloid process in cervical carotid artery dissection

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To look for the presence and strength of association of cervical carotid artery dissection (CCAD) with a long styloid process.

Methods

This case–control analysis included 35 patients with 37 affected carotid arteries. CT angiograms of these patients were analyzed by two raters blinded to clinical and radiological diagnosis. Parameters assessed were styloid process length, its proximity to the cervical internal carotid artery, and its medial and anterior angulations. The same parameters were assessed in 70 CT angiograms in age and sex matched controls.

Results

Interrater correlations were 0.87, 0.40, 0.71, and 0.79 for styloid process length, contact distance, medial angulation, and anterior angulation, respectively. The mean styloid process length on the affected side was significantly more than on the contralateral side (37.8 vs. 34.6 mm, p = 0.006). There were also significant length and contact distance differences between the styloid processes ipsilateral to dissection and ipsilateral styloid processes of controls (38.9 vs. 36.2 mm, p = 0.05 and 3.1 vs. 5.0 mm, p = 0.05, respectively). There were increasing odds ratios (OR) for dissection with increasing styloid process length, with OR of 4.36 (95 % CI = 1.04 to 18.4, p = 0.04) for length more than 50 mm. ORs for dissection increased with decreasing contact distance, with OR for distances less than 5 mm being 7.58 (95 % CI = 0.93 to 62.1, p = 0.06). There was no significant association of CCAD with angulation of the styloid process.

Conclusion

Length and contact distance of the styloid process are risk factors for CCAD, suggesting mechanical impingement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Debette S, Leys D (2009) Cervical artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 8:668–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Micheli S, Paciaroni M, Corea F, Agnelli G, Zampolini M, Caso V (2010) Cervical artery dissection: emerging risk factors. Open Neurol J 4:50–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodallec MH, Marteau V, Gerber S, Desmottes L, Zins M (2008) Craniocervical arterial dissection: spectrum of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 28:1711–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubinstein SM, Peerdeman SM, van Tulder MW, Riphagen I, Haldeman S (2005) A systematic review of the risk factors for cervical artery dissection. Stroke 36:1575–1580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soo OY, Chan YL, Wong KS (2004) Carotid artery dissection after prolonged head tilting while holding a newborn baby to sleep. Neurology 62:1647–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zuber M, Meder JF, Mas JL (1999) Carotid artery dissection due to elongated styloid process. Neurology 53:1886–1887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chuang WC, Short JH, McKinney AM, Anker L, Knoll B, McKinney ZJ (2007) Reversible left hemispheric ischemia secondary to carotid compression in Eagle syndrome: surgical and CT angiographic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:143–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Basekim CC, Mutlu H, Gungor A, Silit E, Pekkafali Z, Kutlay M et al (2005) Evaluation of styloid process by three-dimensional computed tomography. Eur Radiol 15:134–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Piagkou M, Anagnostopoulou S, Kouladouros K, Piagkos G (2009) Eagle’s syndrome: a review of the literature. Clin Anat 22:545–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Faivre A, Abdelfettah Z, Rodriguez S, Nicoli F (2009) Bilateral internal carotid artery dissection due to elongated styloid processes and shaking dancing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1154–1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Raser JM, Mullen MT, Kasner SE, Cucchiara BL, Messé SR (2011) Cervical carotid artery dissection is associated with styloid process length. Neurology 77:2061–2066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keshelava G, Nachkepia M, Arabidze G, Janashia G, Beselia K (2012) Unusual positional compression of the internal carotid artery causes carotid thrombosis and cerebral ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 26:572e15–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung T, Tschermitschek H, Hippen H, Schneider B, Borchers L (2004) Elongated styloid process: when is it really elongated? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:119–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. More CB, Asrani MK (2010) Evaluation of the styloid process on digital panoramic radiographs. Indian J Radiol Imaging 20:261–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Etesami M, Qiao Y, Wityk RJ, Wasserman BA (2011) Signal characteristic alterations of carotid artery dissection on high resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a follow-up study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:393. doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P393

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prakash Muthusami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muthusami, P., Kesavadas, C., Sylaja, P.N. et al. Implicating the long styloid process in cervical carotid artery dissection. Neuroradiology 55, 861–867 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1186-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1186-1

Keywords

Navigation