Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Cerebral angiography is an invasive procedure associated with a small, but definite risk of neurological morbidity. In this study we sought to establish the nature and rate of complications at our institution among a large prospective cohort of consecutive patients. Also, the data were analysed in an attempt to identify risk factors for complications associated with catheter angiography.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected for a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography between January 2001 and May 2006. A total of 2,924 diagnostic cerebral angiography procedures were performed during this period. The following data were recorded for each procedure: date of procedure, patient age and sex, clinical indication, referring specialty, referral status (routine/emergency), operator, angiographic findings, and the nature of any clinical complication or asymptomatic adverse event (arterial dissection).

Results

Clinical complications occurred in 23 (0.79%) of the angiographic procedures: 12 (0.41%) significant puncture-site haematomas, 10 (0.34%) transient neurological events, and 1 nonfatal reaction to contrast agent. There were no permanent neurological complications. Asymptomatic technical complications occurred in 13 (0.44%) of the angiographic procedures: 3 groin dissections and 10 dissections of the cervical vessels. No patient with a neck dissection suffered an immediate or delayed stroke. Emergency procedures (P = 0.0004) and angiography procedures performed for intracerebral haemorrhage (P = 0.02) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (P = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of complications.

Conclusion

Neurological complications following cerebral angiography are rare (0.34%), but must be minimized by careful case selection and the prudent use of alternative noninvasive angiographic techniques, particularly in the acute setting. The low complication rate in this series was largely due to the favourable case mix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, terBrugge K et al (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Earnest F, Forbes G, Sandok BA et al (1984) Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142:247–253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H (1990) Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA: complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology 32:296–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ et al (1987) Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 18:997–1004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA et al (1994) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1401–1407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston DC, Chapman KM, Goldstein LB (2001) Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 57:2012–2014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Waugh JR, Sacharias N (1992) Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 182:243–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olivecrona H (1977) Complications of cerebral angiography. Neuroradiology 14:175–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leffers AM, Wagner A (2000) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: a retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 41:204–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenberg RL, Bank WO, Hedgcock MW (1980) Neurological complications of angiography in patients with critical stenosis of the carotid artery. Neurology 30:892–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mani RL, Eisenberg RL, McDonald EJ Jr et al (1978) Complications of catheter arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:861–865

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Komiyama M, Yamanaka K, Nishikawa M et al (1998) Prospective analysis of complications of catheter cerebral angiography in the digital subtraction and magnetic resonance era. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 38:534–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Warnock NG, Gandhi MR, Bergvall U et al (1993) Complication rates of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease. Br J Radiol 66:855–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi M, Kawanami H (1972) Complications of catheter angiography: an analysis of 500 examinations. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 19:248–258

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kachel R, Jahn U, Schiffmann R et al (1991) Complications in cerebral angiography. A study of 6698 cerebral angiographies. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 95:97–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuah KC, Stuckey SL, Berman IG (2004) Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography: detection with diffusion-weighted imaging. Australas Radiol 48:133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R et al (1999) Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 354:1577–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mani RL, Eisenberg RL (1978) Complications of catheter arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. II. Relation of complication rates to clinical and arteriographic diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:867–869

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE (1999) Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arterio-venous malformation: A meta-analysis. Stroke 30:317–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ (1990) Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 21:209–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Antonovic R, Rosch J, Dotter C (1976) The value of systemic arterial heparinisation in transfemoral angiography: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 127:223–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shannon P, Billbao JM, Marotta T et al (2006) Inadvertent foreign body embolization in diagnostic and therapeutic cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:278–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilcox J, Wilson AJ, Evill CA et al (1987) A comparison of blood-brain barrier disruption by intracarotid iohexol and iodixanol in the rabbit. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 8:769–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kato K, Tomura N, Sakuma I, Watarai J (2003) Ischemic lesions related to cerebral angiography: evaluation by diffusion weighted MR imaging. Neuroradiology 45:39–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Bartsch AJ et al (2004) Heparin and air filters reduce embolic events caused by intra-arterial cerebral angiography: a prospective, randomized trial. Circulation 110:2210–2215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, S10 2JF, Sheffield, UK

    A. A. Dawkins, A. L. Evans, J. Wattam, C. A. J. Romanowski, D. J. A. Connolly, T. J. Hodgson & S. C. Coley

Authors
  1. A. A. Dawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. L. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Wattam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. A. J. Romanowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. J. A. Connolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. J. Hodgson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. C. Coley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Dawkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawkins, A.A., Evans, A.L., Wattam, J. et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 49, 753–759 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0252-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0252-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation