Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization study on performance, combustion and emission of nano additive blends of grapeseed oil methyl ester fuelled CI engine with various piston bowl geometries

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work studies the outcome of various piston bowl geometries like shallow depth combustion chamber (SCC), toroidal shaped combustion chamber (TCC) and hemispherical shaped combustion chamber (HCC) in a compression ignition engine energized with diesel and grapeseed oil methyl ester with nano additives. The non-edible oil selected for the present investigation is grapeseed oil which was derived from winery waste. After single step transesterification with sodium hydroxide and methanol, grapeseed oil methyl ester was produced, and 100% of this biodiesel was further blended with optimized Zinc oxide nano particles of 100 ppm to reduce the NO emissions. Tests were conducted in 5.2 kW at 1500 rpm, single cylinder diesel engine. Performance, combustion and emission characteristics were studied for three sorts of combustion chamber geometry using grapeseed oil biodiesel with zinc oxide nano particles. Brake thermal efficiency turned out to be higher for toroidal combustion chamber in comparison with the other two designs of combustion chamber geometry. Also, other emissions like CO, HC and smoke were lower with toroidal shaped combustion chamber geometry. Considering the engine analysis, the toroidal shaped combustion chamber geometry was found to be better than shallow depth and hemispherical combustion chamber at all operating load conditions. The NO emissions were also found to be 13.2% lesser at full load operation for grapeseed oil methyl ester with zinc oxide nano particle blend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TCC:

Toroidal shaped combustion chamber

HCC:

Hemispherical shaped combustion chamber

SCC:

Shallow depth combustion chamber

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

UBHC:

Unburned hydrocarbons

NOx:

Oxides of nitrogen

CI:

Compression ignition

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

GSBD:

Grapeseed oil biodiesel

ZnO:

Zinc oxide

BSFC:

Brake specific fuel consumption

BTE:

Brake thermal efficiency

EGT:

Exhaust gas temperature

GSBD ZnO 100:

Grapeseed oil biodiesel with 100 ppm of zinc oxide nano emulsion

GSBD ZnO HCC:

Grapeseed oil biodiesel with 100 ppm of zinc oxide nano emulsion in hemispherical shape

GSBD ZnO TCC:

Grapeseed oil biodiesel with 100 ppm of zinc oxide nano emulsion in toroidal shape

GSBD ZnO SCC:

Grapeseed oil biodiesel with 100 ppm of zinc oxide nano emulsion in shallow depth shape

References

  1. Khond VW, Kriplani VM (2016) Effect of nanofluid additives on performances and emissions of emulsified diesel and biodiesel fueled stationary CI engine: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 59:1338–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. (2014) Executive summary: short-term energy outlook, analysis and projections. A Report of International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/exec_summ.cfm

  3. Purushothaman K, Nagarajan G (2009) Performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a compression ignition engine operating on neat orange oil. Renew Energy 34(1):242–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rakopoulos DC (2013) Combustion and emissions of cottonseed oil and its bio-diesel in blends with either n-butanol or diethyl ether in HSDI diesel engine. Fuel 105:603–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasiraman G, Edwin Geo V, Nagalingam B (2016) Assessment of cashew nut shell oil as an alternate fuel for CI (compression ignition) engines. Energy 101:402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashok B, ThundilKaruppa Raj R, Nanthagopal K, Krishnan R, Subbarao R (2017) Lemon peel oil - a novel renewable alternative energy source for diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 139:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhinesh B, Lalvani JIJ, Parthasarathy M, Annamalai K (2016) An assessment on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of single cylinder diesel engine powered by Cymbopogon flexuosus biofuel. Energy Convers Manag 117:466–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prakash T, Edwin Geo V, Leenus Jesu Martin M, Nagalingam B (2018) Effect of ternary blends of bio-ethanol, diesel and castor oil on performance, emission and combustion in a CI engine. Renew Energy 122:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nabi MN, Rasul MG (2018) Influence of second-generation biodiesel on engine performance, emissions, energy and exergy parameters. Energy Convers Manag 169:326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abed KA, El Morsi AK, Sayed MM, El Shaib AA, Gad MS (2018) Effect of waste cooking-oil biodiesel on performance and exhaust emissions of a diesel engine. Egypt J Pet 27:985–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banapurmath NR, Chavan AS, Bansode SB, Patil S, Naveen G et al (2015) Effect of combustion chamber shapes on the performance of Mahua and neem biodiesel operated diesel engines. J Pet Environ Biotechnol 6:230

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaichandar S, Annamalai K (2013) Combined impact of injection pressure and combustion chamber geometry on the performance of a biodiesel fueled diesel engine. Energy 55:330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Y, Zhao H, Melas DA, Ladommatos N (2004) Computational study of the effects of the re-entrant lip shape and toroidal radii of piston bowl on a HSDI diesel engine’s performance and emissions. SAE technical paper. 2004-01-0118

  14. Prasad BV, Sharma CS, Anand TN, Ravikrishna RV (2011) High swirl-inducing piston bowls in small diesel engines for emission reduction. Appl Energy 88(7):2355–2367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi Y, Reitz RD (2008) Optimization study of the effects of bowl geometry, spray targeting, and swirl ratio for a heavy-duty diesel engine operated at low and high load. Int J Engine Res 9:325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dolak JG, Shi Y, Reitz RD (2010) A computational investigation of stepped-bowl piston geometry for a light duty engine operating at low load. SAE technical paper. 2010-01-1263

  17. Praveena V, Martin LJ (2018) A review on various after treatment techniques to reduce NOx emissions in a CI engine. J Energy Inst 91(5):704–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Praveena V, Martin LJ (2018) Design optimization of urea injectors and mixers in a compact SCR system (no. 2018-28-0025). SAE Technical Paper

  19. Kumar V, Jnawali P, Handa V, Kaur G, Kaur S, Tanwar B, Mwendivwa Precieuse K, Vyas G (2016) A brief overview of Indian wines and wineries. Processed Food Industry 19:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bayrak E (2013) Utilization of wine waste for fermentative processes. MS thesis. Izmir Institute of Technology

  21. Chelladorai P et al (2018) Synergistic effect of hydrogen induction with biofuel obtained from winery waste (grapeseed oil) for CI engine application. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:12473–12490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bolonio D, García-Martínez M-J, Ortega MF, Lapuerta M, Rodríguez-Fernández J, Canoira L (2019) Fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) obtained from grapeseed oil: a fully renewable biofuel. Renew Energy 132:278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramanian T, Varuvel EG, Ganapathy S, Vedharaj S, Vallinayagam R (2018) Role of fuel additives on reduction of NO X emission from a diesel engine powered by camphor oil biofuel. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(16):15368–15377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shivashimpi MM, Alur SA, Topannavar SN, Dodamani BM (2018) Combined effect of combustion chamber shapes and nozzle geometry on the performance and emission characteristics of C.I. engine operated on pongamia. Energy 154:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashok B, Nanthagopal N, Mohan A, Johny A, Tamilarasu A (2017) Comparative analysis on the effect of zinc oxide and Ethanox as additives with biodiesel in CI engine. Energy 140:352–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Viswanathan K, Pasupathy B (2017) Studies on piston bowl geometries using single blend ratio of various non-edible oils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:17068

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would thank the SRM Institution for carrying out this work under the Selective Excellence Research funding scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveena Vedagiri.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vedagiri, P., Martin, L.J. & Varuvel, E.G. Characterization study on performance, combustion and emission of nano additive blends of grapeseed oil methyl ester fuelled CI engine with various piston bowl geometries. Heat Mass Transfer 56, 715–726 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02740-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02740-9

Navigation