Abstract
Determining the temperature of several steel coils, heated in a furnace with a controlled hydrogen environment is important in an annealing process. Temperatures must be defined during heat treatment in order to guarantee metallurgical properties and acceptable reduced residual stresses. In this paper we approach hydrogen flow characteristics in the furnace and through a set of coils using an annealing non-differential model. Fluid flow is schematized as a pipe network solved by the Hardy Cross method to obtain pressure drops across the various gas flow segments. A comparison is made between measured and simulated results, confirming the adequacy of adopted assumptions and the validity of proposed model. Convective and radiative exchanges between the furnace and the coils are calculated by a discretization using the finite differences method. The convection coefficients are estimated and introduced into the boundary conditions around the coil to obtain the temperature distribution in the coils and in the covering bell. Finally, heat exchanges by convection and radiation are estimated by this model and the modeling errors are <8 °C.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Nb :
-
Number of coils
- N c :
-
Number of discretization points
- Nu :
-
Nusselt number
- Re :
-
Reynolds number
- Pr :
-
Prandtl number
- L :
-
Length (m)
- D H :
-
Hydraulic diameter (m)
- A :
-
Section of the pipe (m2)
- Q:
-
Flow rate in the pipe (m3/s)
- U :
-
Gas velocity (m/s)
- Cvi :
-
Number of channels in the ith convector
- q i :
-
Flow rate in a stylized branch i
- P i :
-
Pressure drop in the branch i (Pa)
- r i :
-
Coil interior radius (m)
- r e :
-
Coil exterior radius (m)
- r b :
-
Bell interior radius (m)
- r cg :
-
Gas cane radius (m)
- x cg :
-
Gas cane height (m)
- b i :
-
Burner coefficient
- t :
-
Time (s)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- T cg :
-
Temperature of the gas cane
- T b :
-
Temperature of the bell vis-a-vis the gas cane
- T b :
-
Temperature of the coil vis-a-vis the gas cane
- S :
-
Surface (m2)
- F S1–S2 :
-
Factor form of surface S1 towards surface S2
- F c–cg :
-
Factor form of the coil towards the gas cane
- F b–cg :
-
Factor form of the bell towards the gas cane
- k :
-
Thermal conductivity (W/m °C)
- h :
-
Convection coefficient (W/m2 °C)
- h cg :
-
Convection coefficient of the gas cane
- h b :
-
Convection coefficient of the bell
- h c :
-
Convection coefficient at the external radius coil
- h hp :
-
Convection coefficient of high pile
- h lp :
-
Convection coefficient of low pile
- h ey :
-
Convection coefficient at coil core (eye coil)
- h sp :
-
Convection coefficient at the coil section
- Δr :
-
Step discretization (axis r) (m)
- Δz :
-
Step discretization (axis z) (m)
- Δx :
-
Differential element
- λ:
-
Regular pressure drop coefficient
- χ i :
-
ith Singular pressure drop coefficient
- ρ :
-
Density (kg/m3)
- µ:
-
Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)
- εcg :
-
Cane gas emissivity
- εg :
-
Gas emissivity
- εb :
-
Bell emissivity
- φ:
-
Radiative flux (W/m2)
- σ:
-
Stephan–Boltzman constant, 5.67 × 10−8 (W/m2 K4)
- \( \theta_{0}^{b} \) :
-
Bell wall temperature at the level of the gas cane (°C)
- \( \theta_{0}^{{b^{n} }} \) :
-
Bell wall temperature at the nth iteration (°C)
- \( \theta_{x}^{b} \) :
-
Bell temperature at a height x of the gas cane (°C)
- \( \theta_{g} \) :
-
Gas cane temperature (°C)
- ξg :
-
Maximum variation tolerated for \( \theta_{0}^{cl} \)
- \( \zeta_{fl} \) :
-
Maximum deviation tolerated speeds (%) between two iterations of Newton–Raphson
- b:
-
Bell
- c:
-
Coil
- g:
-
Gas
- cg:
-
Cane gas
- hp:
-
High pile
- lp:
-
Low pile
- ey:
-
Eye of coil
- sp:
-
Spacer
References
Jaluria Y (1988) Numerical simulation of the transport processes in a heat treatment furnace. Int J Numer Methods Eng 25:387–399
Sabbonchi A, Hassanpour S (2008) Experimental and numerical investigation of coil heating in hydrogen annealing furnace for optimum arrangement of charge. Exp Heat Transf 21:220–235
Zou Y, Wu W, Zhang X, Lin L, Xiang S (2001) A study of heat transfer in high performance hydrogen bell-type annealing furnace. Heat Transf Asian Res 38(8):615–623
Tagliafico LA, Senarega M (2004) A simulation code for batch heat treatments. Int J Therm Sci 43:509–517
Sahay S, Kumar AM (2002) Applications of integrated batch annealing furnace simulator. Mater Manuf Process 17(4):439–453
Azimian AR, Kazimi AR (2005) Simulation of a box annealing unit. Int J Int Soc Scientometr Infometr 2(1):7–20
Sahay SS et al (2001) Development of an integrated batch annealing simulator for the CRM complex. Tata Search 64–71
Lopes AMG (2003) Implementation of the Hardy–Cross method for the solution of piping networks. Coimbra University, Coimbra, pp 117–125
Gilles RV, Evett JB, Liu C (1995) Mécanique des fluides et hydraulique. Mc Graw-Hill, Paris
Boussicaud A (1983) Calcul des pertes de charge. Chaud–Froid–Plomberie, Paris
Comolet R (1994) Mécanique expérimentale des fluides, Tome II: Dynamique des fluides réels; turbomachines. 4ème edn. Masson, Paris
Idel’cik IE (1986) Mémento des pertes de charge. Eyrolles, Paris
Grundmann D. The principles of fluid flow in a HPH bell-type annealing furnace. In: LOI high-performance hydrogen annealing colloquium, Technical University, Aachen
Kaihara T, Kawasaki T, Shiraishi N, Takeda S, Fujii S (1979) Optimum operation system of a batch type annealing furnace. Tetsu-to-Hagane 66(10)
Mo CL, Li Q, Guo XM, Wang H (2012) Numerical simulation the temperature field of the multi-coil batch during annealing process in bell-type furnace. Adv Mater Res 538–541:637–641
Chen G, Mingyan G (2007) Simulation of steel coil heat transfer in a high performance hydrogen furnace. Heat Transf Eng 28(1):25–30
Mc Adams WH (1967) Heat transmission. Mc Graw-Hill, New York
Krasnochtchekov E, Soukomel A (1985) Problèmes de transfert de chaleur. Mir, Moscou
Nougier JP (2001) Méthode de calcul numérique. Hermès Lavoisier, Paris
Gosse J (1981) Guide technique de thermique. Dunod, Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Pressure drop coefficients
Using books and mementos [9–12], expressions of the pressure drop coefficients on all the singularities encountered in the annealing base are obtained.
-
Gas entering in the pipe: χ = 0.5
-
Gas outlet in the pipe: χ = 1.06
-
Singular pressure drop upper coil: χ = 1
-
Pressure drop intrados: χ = 1
-
Singular pressure drop at the top of the bell: χ = 2
Singular pressure drop stack top hat: the convector on top of stack, a hole was made to change the distribution of flows in base. Laboratory tests have estimated the pressure drops based on the ratio \( \frac{{d_{hp} }}{{D_{hp} }} \) (Fig. 15). We modeled these losses by the regression formula
We introduce this formula into the calculation of pressure drops because the diameter of the orifice top of the stack d hp , although the fixed construction; could be variable in order to better distribute the flow in the database.
Currently \( \frac{{d_{hp} }}{{D_{hp} }} = \frac{100}{605} = 0.165, \) gives a pressure drop coefficient χ = 105.
Appendix 2: Gas temperature calculation
The case of an annealing of 3 coils is taken into account (Fig. 10). The calculation of the temperatures will be carried out according to the 4 steps:
Step 1
Knowing the temperature in A \( (\theta_{g} ), \) one will calculate by Eq. (14) the temperature in the branch \( \overline{AB} \). The temperature in B, \( \theta_{B} \) is known.
Step 2
Knowing the temperature in A \( (\theta_{g} ), \) one will calculate by Eq. (14) the temperature in the branch \( \overline{AC} \), and then \( \theta_{C} \) is known.
Step 3
Knowing the temperature at C, one will calculate by Eq. (17) the temperature in the branch \( \overline{CK} \), and then the temperature \( \theta_{K} \) in the branch is known. This same reasoning is continued to calculate sequentially \( \theta_{D} , \theta_{H} , \theta_{E} , \theta_{F} \) by Eq. (19) and \( \theta_{G} , \theta_{N} \) by Eq. (23).
Step 4
Knowing \( \theta_{C} \) and \( \theta_{H} \), by Eq. (25), one will calculate \( \theta_{I} \). By a similar reasoning one will calculate \( \theta_{I} ,\theta_{L} \) and \( \theta_{0} . \) If the ventilator block is at a thermal balance (low mass), then the temperature in O is identical to the temperature in P (the gas circulates in closed loop and the ventilator does not modify its temperature). The temperature in B is not combined with the temperature of gas flow in P. The 4 steps make it possible to calculate the temperature in P (exit ventilator diffuser) then, by propagation of heat along the gas circuit, the temperature in O (entry ventilator diffuser). While supposing known: convection coefficients; temperatures of the walls (roughly, temperatures of the coils at the step (t − Δt) resulting from the model of propagation of heat in a coil); velocities of the fluid (determined by the model of circulation of gas fluid at the step (t − Δt); the bell temperature (known as a result of the temperature of the gas cane gas and at the temperature of the bell next the gas cane). Thus the temperature in B (exit ventilator diffuser) is identical to the temperature in P (entry ventilator diffuser). If \( \theta_{B} \ne \theta_{P} , \) then at least one of the parameters which models the thermal transfer is incorrect or unknown. By supposing the correct parameters, the only unknown parameter, but fixed in the algorithm at an arbitrary value, is \( \theta_{0}^{b} \).
Three cases arise:
Case 1
\( \theta_{P} > \theta_{B} , \) the gas was heated too much by licking the bell and thus the temperature of bell is too high. At the moment t of the calculation, the temperature of the gas cane is constant: according to Eq. (30), it is necessary to decrease \( \theta_{0}^{x} , \) and therefore \( \theta_{0}^{b} \) too.
Case 2
\( \theta_{B} > \theta_{P } , \) the gas was not heated enough by licking the bell. Thus the temperature of bell is not high enough. It is necessary to increase \( \theta_{0}^{b} \).
Case 3
\( \theta_{B} = \theta_{P } , \) the gas was heated sufficiently on the wall of the bell to guarantee the continuity of the temperatures along the gas circuit: \( \theta_{0}^{b} \) is thus well adapted. It is a question of finding in such way that the difference between \( \theta_{B} \) and \( \theta_{P} \) is nil. Mathematically, the calculation algorithm of the temperature of gas can result in a real scalar function F which at \( \theta_{0}^{b} \) forward the value of \( (\theta_{B} - \theta_{P} ) \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haouam, A., Bigerelle, M. Flow rate distribution and effect of convection and radiation heat transfer on the temperature profile during a coil annealing process. Heat Mass Transfer 51, 265–276 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1409-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1409-y