Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation and optimization of thermal performance of evacuated tube solar collector system

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy (ANFIS) in order to predict the thermal performance of evacuated tube solar collector system have been used. The experimental data for the training and testing of the networks were used. The results of ANN are compared with ANFIS in which the same data sets are used. The R2-value for the thermal performance values of collector is 0.811914 which can be considered as satisfactory. The results obtained when unknown data were presented to the networks are satisfactory and indicate that the proposed method can successfully be used for the prediction of the thermal performance of evacuated tube solar collectors. In addition, new formulations obtained from ANN are presented for the calculation of the thermal performance. The advantages of this approaches compared to the conventional methods are speed, simplicity, and the capacity of the network to learn from examples. In addition, genetic algorithm (GA) was used to maximize the thermal performance of the system. The optimum working conditions of the system were determined by the GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Collector area (m2)

Cp :

Specific heat (J/kg °C)

D:

Hydraulic diameter (m)

F′:

Collector efficiency factor

FR :

Heat removal factor

h:

Heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

hw :

Wind convection coefficient (W/m2 K)

Hday :

Daily collectible radiation (J/m2)

I:

Solar radiation (W/m2)

k:

Thermal conductivity (W/m K)

ki :

Thermal conductivity of insulating material (W/m K)

\(\dot{m}\) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

M:

Water mass in the storage tank (kg)

N:

Number of glass covers

Pr :

Prandtl number

Re :

Reynolds number

t:

Thickness of insulating material (m)

ta :

Ambient temperature (°C)

ti :

Inlet temperature (°C)

tf :

Final temperature (°C)

tm :

Mean storage tank temperature (°C)

tp :

Temperature of absorber plate (°C)

UL :

Overall heat loss coefficient (W/m2 K)

UT :

Top heat loss coefficient (W/m2 K)

W:

Wind velocity (m/s)

\(\tau\) :

Transmittance of glass cover

\(\alpha\) :

Absorptance of absorber plate

\(\eta\) :

Thermal performance

\(\varepsilon_{p}\) :

Absorber plate emissivity

\(\varepsilon_{g}\) :

Emissivity of glass cover

\(\beta\) :

Collector tilt angle (°)

∆t:

Time interval

References

  1. Zambolin E, Del Col D (2012) An improved procedure for the experimental characterization of optical efficiency in evacuated tube solar collectors. Renew Energy 43:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu L, Wang Z, Yuan G, Li X, Ruan Y (2012) A new dynamic test method for thermal performance of all-glass evacuated solar air collectors. Sol Energy 86:1222–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang XR, Yamaguchi H (2008) An experimental study on evacuated tube solar collector using supercritical CO2. Appl Therm Eng 28:1225–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayompe LM, Duffy A, Mckeever M, Conlon M, McCormack SJ (2011) Comparative field performance study of flat plate and heat pipe evacuated tube collectors (ETCs) for domestic water heating systems in a temperate climate. Energy 36:3370–3378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang R, Yang Y, Gao W (2011) Comparative studies on thermal performance of water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heaters with different collector tilt-angles. Sol Energy 85:1381–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zambolin E, Del Col D (2010) Experimental analysis of thermal performance of flat plate and evacuated tube solar collectors in stationary standard and daily conditions. Sol Energy 84:1382–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nkwetta DN, Smyth M, Zacharopoulos A, Hyde T (2012) Optical evaluation and analysis of an internal low-concentrated evacuated tube heat pipe solar collector for powering solar air-conditioning systems. Renew Energy 39:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang R, Gao W, Yu Y, Chen H (2009) Optimal tilt-angles of all-glass evacuated tube solar collectors. Energy 34:1387–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma N, Diaz G (2011) Performance model of a novel evacuated-tube solar collector based on minichannels. Sol Energy 85:881–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Houri A, Salloum H, Ali A, Abdel Razik AK, Houri L (2012) Quantification of energy produced from an evacuated tube water heater in a real setting. Renew Energy 49:111–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang R, Ma L, Zhang J, Zhao D (2011) Theoretical and experimental investigation of the filled-type evacuated tube solar collector with U tube. Sol Energy 85:1735–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma L, Lu Z, Zhang J, Liang R (2010) Thermal performance analysis of the glass evacuated tube solar collector with U-tube. Build Environ 45:1959–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim Y, Seo T (2007) Thermal performances comparisons of the glass evacuated tube solar collectors with shapes of absorber tube. Renew Energy 32:772–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayompe LM, Duffy A, McCormack SJ, Conlon M (2011) Validated TRNSYS model for forced circulation solar water heating systems with flat plate and heat pipe evacuated tube collectors. Appl Therm Eng 31:1536–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah LJ, Furbo S (2004) Vertical evacuated tubular-collectors utilizing solar radiation from all directions. Appl Energy 78:371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberto B, Ubaldo C, Stefano M, Roberto I, Elisa S, Paolo M (2010) Graybox and adaptative dynamic neural network identification models to infer the steady state efficiency of solar thermal collectors starting from the transient condition. Sol Energy 84:1027–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Souliotis M, Kalogirou S, Tripanagnostopoulos Y (2009) Modelling of an ICS solar water heater using artificial neural networks and TRNSYS. Renew Energy 34:1333–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalogirou SA (2006) Prediction of flat-plate collector performance parameters using artificial neural networks. Sol Energy 80:248–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezen HH (2010) Theoretical and experimental investigation of evacuated tube solar collector. Master thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Isparta (in Turkish)

  20. Veelenturf LPJ (1995) Analysis and applications of artificial neural networks. Prentice Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Haykin SS (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsoukalas LH, Uhrig RE (1997) Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fu LM (1994) Neural Networks in Computer Intelligence. Mc Graw-Hill International Editions, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ying LC, Pan MC (2008) Using adaptive network based fuzzy inference system to forecast regional electricity loads. Energy Conversat Manag 49:205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buragohain M, Mahanta C (2008) A novel approach for ANFIS modeling based on full factorial design. Appl Soft Comput 8:609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Matlab Fuzzy logic toolbox user’s guide. Natick: The Math Works Inc., http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/fuzzy/fuzzy.pdf

  27. Holland H (1975) Adaption in natural and artifical systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peteghem VV, Vanhoucke M (2010) A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 201:409–418

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Köse E, Abacı K, Kızmaz H, Aksoy S, Yalçın MA (2013) Sliding mode control based on genetic algorithm for WSCC systems include of SVC. Electron Electr Eng 19:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kalogirou SA (2004) Solar thermal collectors and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30:231–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Duffie JA, Beckman WA (1991) Solar engineering of thermal processes. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Varun, Siddhartha (2010) Thermal performance optimization of a flat plate solar air heater using genetic algorithm. Appl Energy 87:1793–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arzu Şencan Şahin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dikmen, E., Ayaz, M., Ezen, H.H. et al. Estimation and optimization of thermal performance of evacuated tube solar collector system. Heat Mass Transfer 50, 711–719 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-013-1282-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-013-1282-0

Keywords

Navigation