Skip to main content
Log in

Flow field and thermal characteristics in a model of a tangentially fired furnace under different conditions of burner tripping

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tangentially fired furnaces are vortex-combustion units and are widely used in steam generators of industrial plants. The present study provides a numerical investigation of the problem of turbulent reacting flows in a model furnace of a tangentially fired boiler. The importance of this problem is mainly due to its relation to large boiler furnaces used in thermal power plants. In the present work, calculation of the flow field, temperature and species concentration-contour maps in a tangentially-fired model furnace are provided. The safety of these furnaces requires that the burner be tripped (its fuel is cut off) if the flame is extinguished. Therefore, the present work provides an investigation of the influence of number of tripped burners on the characteristics of the flow and thermal fields. The details of the flow, thermal and combustion fields are obtained from the solution of the conservation equations of mass, momentum and energy and transport equations for scalar variables in addition to the equations of the turbulence model. Available experimental measurements were used for validating the calculation procedure. The results show that the vortex created due to pressure gradient at the furnace center only influenced by tripping at least two burners. However, the temperature distributions are significantly distorted by tripping any of the burners. Regions of very high temperature close to the furnace walls appear as a result of tripping the fuel in one or two of the burners. Calculated heat flux along the furnace walls are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A/F:

Air-to-fuel ratio on a mass basis

C 1 :

Constant (Eq. 6)

C2, C3:

Constant (Eq. 8)

C μ :

Constant (Eq. 4)

D :

Diameter of the furnace used to present validation, diffusivity coefficient of species

d i :

Inner diameter of air annulus

d f :

Diameter of fuel nozzle

d o :

Outer diameter of air annulus

G :

Generation of kinetic energy of turbulence

I :

Total radiation intensity

J :

Diffusion flux of species

k :

Kinetic energy of turbulence

m i :

Mass of species

P :

Pressure

R :

Mass rate of reaction

T :

Temperature

S :

Source term

\(\mathop U\limits^{\_\_} \) :

Mean velocity

u :

Fluctuating velocity component

W :

Width of the furnace, 0.5 m

x, y:

Coordinates of the furnace cross-section measured from the center of the furnace

X+:

Wall at x=0.5 W

X−:

Wall at x=−0.5 W

Y+:

Wall at y=0.5 W

Y−:

Wall at y=−0.5 W

z :

Axial distance of furnace measured from level of burners

ɛ:

Dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy

μ:

Dynamic viscosity

κ:

Absorption coefficient

λ:

Wavelength

Φ:

Dependent variable

ϕ:

Fluctuation in the dependent variable Φ

ρ:

Average density

σ k :

Effective Prandtl number for k

σɛ:

Effective Prandtl number for ɛ

θ:

Angle of burner inclination

–:

Time average

b:

Blackbody

eff:

Effective

k:

Turbulent kinetic energy

λ:

Wavelength

Φ:

Dependent variable

References

  1. Romadin VP (1973) Furnaces with corner firing tangential burners. Therm Eng 20(7):79–89

    Google Scholar 

  2. Habib MA, El-Mahallawy FM, Abdel-Hafez A, Nasseef N, (1992) Stability limits and temperature measurements in a tangentially-fired model furnace. Energy Int J 17(3):283–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson GF (1985) A three-dimensional analytical model of a large tangentially fired furnace. J Ins Energy 58:116–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd RK, Roscarel KJ, Kent JH (1985) Gas flow and mixing in a tangentially fired furnace. In: Third Australasian conference on heat & mass transfer, St. Leonards, May 13–15, pp 51–58

  5. Liu CH, Barkelew CH (1986) Numerical analysis of a jet-stirred reactors with turbulent flows and homogeneous reactions. AICHE J 32(11):1813–1820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen JY, Mann AP, Kent JH (1992) Computational modelling of pulverised fuel burnout in tangentially fired furnaces. Symposium (International) on Combustion, Combustion Inst, Pittsburg, PA, USA, pp 1381–1389

  8. Baldyga J, Pohorecki R (1995) Turbulent micromixing in chemical reactors—a Review. Chem Eng J 58:183–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coelho PJ, Carvalho MG (1996) Evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of a power station boiler. J Gas Turbines Power 118:887–895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chungen Yin, Sebastien Caillat, Jean-Luc Harion, Bemard Baudoin, Everest Perez (2002) Investigation of the flow, combustion, heat transfer and emissions from a 609 mw utility tangentially fired, pulverized coal boiler. Fuel 81:997–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou Y, Dou Y, Jiang H, Hui S, Xu T (1999) Effect of furnace structure on velocity deviation tangentially fired boiler. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ 33(6):32–35

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dou W, Zhou Y, Zhou Q, Hui S, Xu T (1999) Effect of counter—tangent stream in burners on flue gas imbalance of large tangentially fired boiler. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ 33(6):36–38

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thou YG, Zhang MC, Xu TM, Hui SF (2001) Experimental and numerical study on the flue gas velocity deviation in a tangentially fired boiler furnace. Proc Chin Soc Electrical Eng 21(1):68–72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ma CY, Mahmoud T, Gaskell PH, Hampertsoumian E (1999) Numerical predictions of a turbulent diffusion flame in a cylindrical combustor using eddy dissipation flamelet combustion models. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 213(C):697–705

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fan JR, Zha XD, Cen KF (2001) Study on coal combustion characteristics in a W-shaped boiler furnace. Fuel 80:373–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hjertager LK, Osenbroch J, Hjertager BH, Solberg T, (2000) Validation of the eddy dissipation concept for fast chemical reactions in turbulent flows. Chemical Reaction Engineering VII: CFD, 6–11 August, Quebec City, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hjertager LK, Hjertager BH, Solberg T (2001) CFD modeling of fast chemical reactions in turbulent liquid flows. Chemical Engineering Laboratory, Aalborg University Esbjerg

  18. Yaga M, Sasada K, Yamamoto T, Aoki H, Miura T (2000) An eddy characteristic time modeling in les for gas turbine combustor mitsuru. In: Proceedings of 2000 international joint power generation conference Miami Beach, Florida, 23–26 July, 2000, pp 1–6

  19. Golovitchev VI, Chomiak J Chalmers (1996) Analysis of main assumptions underlying extended eddy dissipation model of turbulent combustion. University Of Technology Thermo-And Fluid Dynamics, GOteborg 412 96, Sweden

  20. Soufiani A, Djavdan E (1994) A comparison between weighted sum of gray gases and statistical narrow-band radiation models for combustion applications. Combust Flame (97):240–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartmann JM, Levi Di Leon R, Taine J (1984) Line by line and narrow band statiscal model calculations for H2O. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Trasfer 32:119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim KT, Menart JA, Lee HS (1991) Nongray radiative gas analyses using the S-N discrete ordinates method. ASME J Heat Transfer 113:946–952

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Modest MF (1991) The weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model for arbitrary solution methods in radiative transfer. J Heat Transfer 113:651–656

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hottel HC, Sarofim AF (1967) Radiative transfer. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soufiani A, Djavdan E (1994) A comparsion between weighted sum of gray gases and statistical narrow-band radiation models for combustion application. Combust Flame 97:240–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Denison MK, Webb BW (1995a) The spectral line-based weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model in nonisothermal nonhomogeneous media. ASME J Heat Transfer 117:359–365

    Google Scholar 

  27. Denison MK, Webb BW (1995b) Development and application of an absorption-line blackbody distribution function for C02. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 38(10):1813–1821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Denison MK, Webb BW (1995c) The spectral line-based weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model for H2O/CO2 Mixtures. ASME J Heat Transfer 117:788–792

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang L, Soufiani A, Taine J (1988) Spectral correlated and non-correlated radiative transfer in a finite axisymmetric system containing an absorbing and emitting real gas-particle mixture. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 31(11):2261–2272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu F, Becker HA, Bindar Y (1998) A comparative study of radiative heat transfer modeling in gas-fired furnaces using the simple grey and the weighted-sum-of-grey-gases models. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 41:3357–3371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Modak AT (1979) Radiation from products of combustion. Fire Res 1:339–3361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith TF, Shen ZF, Friedman JN (1982) Evaluation of coefficients for the weighted sum of gray gases model. J Heat Transfer 104:602–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Truelove JS (1976) A mixed grey gas model for flame radiation, United Kingdom atomic energy authority report AERER-8494, Harwell

  34. Reynolds WC (1987) Fundamentals of turbulence for turbulence modeling and simulation. Lecture notes for Von Karman Institute, Agard Report No. 755

  35. Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Zhu J (1995) A new k-ɛ eddy-viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows—model development and validation. Comput Fluids 24(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Habib MA, Attya AE, McEligot DM (1989) Calculation of turbulent flow and heat transfer in channels with streamwise periodic flow. ASME J Turbomachinery 110:405–411

    Google Scholar 

  37. Magnussen BF, Hjertager BH (1976) On mathematical models of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. In: 16th Symposium (Int’l.) on combustion, The Combustion Institute

  38. Siegel R, Howell J (2002) Thermal radiation heat transfer, 4th edn. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Patankar SV (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, 1st edn. Taylor and Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Habib MA, Whitelaw JH (1982) The calculation of turbulent flow in wide angle diffusers. Num Heat Transfer 5:145–164

    Google Scholar 

  41. Attya AM, Habib MA (1990) The influence of spray characteristics and air preheat on the flame properties in a gas turbine combustor. In: Nejat T (ed) Multi-phase transport and particulate phenomena. Hemisphere Publishers Corportion, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shuja SZ, Habib MA (1996) Fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics in axisymmetric annular diffusers. Comput Fluids 25(2):133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The support of King Fahd University for this research work is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Habib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habib, M.A., Ben-Mansour, R. & Antar, M.A. Flow field and thermal characteristics in a model of a tangentially fired furnace under different conditions of burner tripping. Heat Mass Transfer 41, 909–920 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-004-0593-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-004-0593-6

Keywords

Navigation