Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered immediate-release, twice-daily (BID) and modified-release, once-daily (QD) formulations of tacrolimus have high interindividual variability. We investigated factors affecting interindividual variability of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant patients.

Methods

Ninety-seven Japanese renal transplant patients (47 patients on tacrolimus BID and 50 patients on tacrolimus QD) were enrolled in this study. The tacrolimus absolute bioavailability was calculated using the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) after continuous intravenous infusion and oral formulations of tacrolimus in the same recipient.

Results

The median (quartile 1–quartile 3) tacrolimus relative bioavailability for recipients with the CYP3A5*1 or CYP3A5*3/*3 alleles was significantly lower for the tacrolimus QD group [9.1 % (6.3–10.7 %) and 15.4 % (11.5–18.7 %), respectively] than for the tacrolimus BID group [12.6 % (9.9–14.2 %) and 19.3 % (16.5–24.8 %), respectively] (P = 0.004 and 0.028, respectively). Consequently, tacrolimus absolute bioavailability was lowest for recipients with the CYP3A5*1 allele taking tacrolimus QD. The CYP3A5 polymorphism had no impact on the dose-adjusted AUC0–24 of tacrolimus in patients on continuous intravenous infusion (P = 0.906).

Conclusion

The larger interindividual variability of tacrolimus bioavailability for oral formulations appears to be due to the effects of the CYP3A5 polymorphism and the tacrolimus oral formulation. These factors should therefore be taken into account when determining individualized tacrolimus dosing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott LJ, McKeage K, Keam SJ, Plosker GL (2003) Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation. Drugs 63:1247–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Staatz CE, Tett SE (2004) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:623–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hesselink DA, van Schaik RH, van der Heiden IP, van der Werf M, Gregoor PJ, Lindemans J, Weimar W, van Gelder T (2003) Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Clin Pharmacol Ther 74:245–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsuchiya N, Satoh S, Tada H, Li Z, Ohyama C, Sato K, Suzuki T, Habuchi T, Kato T (2004) Influence of CYP3A5 and MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 78:1182–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hesselink DA, van Gelder T, van Schaik RH (2005) The pharmacogenetics of calcineurin inhibitors: one step closer toward individualized immunosuppression? Pharmacogenomics 6:323–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hustert E, Haberl M, Burk O, Wolbold R, He YQ, Klein K, Nuessler AC, Neuhaus P, Klattig J, Eiselt R, Koch I, Zibat A, Brockmoller J, Halpert JR, Zanger UM, Wojnowski L (2001) The genetic determinants of the CYP3A5 polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics 11:773–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barraclough KA, Isbel NM, Johnson DW, Campbell SB, Staatz CE (2011) Once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus: are the formulations truly equivalent? Drugs 71:1561–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hougardy JM, de Jonge H, Kuypers D, Abramowicz D (2012) The once-daily formulation of tacrolimus: a step forward in kidney transplantation? Transplantation 93:241–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Crespo M, Mir M, Marin M, Hurtado S, Estadella C, Guri X, Rap O, Moral R, Puig JM, Lloveras J (2009) De novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels. Transplant Proc 41:2115–2117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wlodarczyk Z, Squifflet JP, Ostrowski M, Rigotti P, Stefoni S, Citterio F, Vanrenterghem Y, Kramer BK, Abramowicz D, Oppenheimer F, Pietruck F, Russ G, Karpf C, Undre N (2009) Pharmacokinetics for once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: a randomized, open-label trial. Am J Transplant 9:2505–2513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Niioka T, Satoh S, Kagaya H, Numakura K, Inoue T, Saito M, Narita S, Tsuchiya N, Habuchi T, Miura M (2012) Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogentics of once and twice-daily tacrolimus in the early stage after renal transplantation. Transplantation 94:1013–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuen S, Fukuda T, Maune H, Ikenaga Y, Yamamoto I, Inaba T, Azuma J (2002) Novel detection assay by PCR-RFLP and frequency of the CYP3A5 SNPs, CYP3A5*3 and *6, in a Japanese population. Pharmacogenetics 12:331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cascorbi I, Gerloff T, Johne A, Meisel C, Hoffmeyer S, Schwab M, Schaeffeler E, Eichelbaum M, Brinkmann U, Roots I (2001) Frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the P-glycoprotein drug transporter MDR1 gene in white subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:169–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miura M, Satoh S, Kagaya H, Saito M, Numakura K, Tsuchiya N, Habuchi T (2011) Impact of the CYP3A4*1G polymorphism and its combination with CYP3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients. Pharmacogenomics 12:977–984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miura M, Satoh S, Inoue K, Kagaya H, Saito M, Inoue T, Habuchi T, Suzuki T (2008) Influence of CYP3A5, ABCB1 and NR1I2 polymorphisms on prednisolone pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients. Steroids 73:1052–1059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glowacki F, Lionet A, Hammelin JP, Labalette M, Provot F, Hazzan M, Broly F, Noel C, Cauffiez C (2011) Influence of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of the prolonged-release, once-daily formulation of tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipietns. Clin Pharmacokinet 50:451–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Canaparo R, Finnstrom N, Serpe L, Nordmark A, Muntoni E, Eandi M, Rane A, Zara GP (2007) Expression of CYP3A isoforms and P-glycoprotein in human stomach, jejunum and ileum. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34:1138–1144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uesugi M, Masuda S, Katsura T, Oike F, Takada Y, Inui K (2006) Effect of intestinal CYP3A5 on postoperative tacrolimus trough levels in living-donor liver transplant recipients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 16:119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin YS, Dowling AL, Quigley SD, Farin FM, Zhang J, Lamba J, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE (2002) Co-regulation of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and contribution to hepatic and intestinal midazolam metabolism. Mol Pharmacol 62:162–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Picard N, Rouguieg-Malki K, Kamar N, Rostaing L, Marquet P (2011) CYP3A5 genotype does not influence everolimus in vitro metabolism and clinical pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 91:652–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dai Y, Hebert MF, Isoherranen N, Davis CL, Marsh C, Shen DD, Thummel KE (2006) Effect of CYP3A5 polymorphism on tacrolimus metabolic clearance in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos 34:836–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. De BK, Jimenez E, Sawyer JC, McMillin GA (2009) Analytical performance characteristics of the Abbott Architect i2000 Tacrolimus assay; comparisons with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and Abbott IMx methods. Clin Chim Acta 410:25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallemacq P, Goffinet JS, O’Morchoe S et al (2009) Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay. Ther Drug Monit 31:198–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant (No. 23592378 and No. 24927005) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masatomo Miura.

Additional information

Takenori Niioka and Hideaki Kagaya contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niioka, T., Kagaya, H., Miura, M. et al. Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69, 1659–1665 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1514-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1514-8

Keywords

Navigation