Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of caffeine toxicity associated with the use of ‘legal highs’ (novel psychoactive substances)

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Caffeine has desired stimulant effects similar to but weaker than both classical recreational drugs and novel psychoactive substances. This study was undertaken to determine the caffeine content of a sample of novel psychoactive substances, and we discuss the implications for the management of acute recreational drug toxicity.

Methods

Six novel psychoactive products (‘legal highs’) that were not declared to contain caffeine were purchased from different Internet suppliers; one additional product was supplied by the UK police force. Analysis of these products was undertaken using infrared spectroscopy (IR), gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) to identify the active ingredient(s) and measure the caffeine content of the product.

Results

All seven products, which weighed approximately 1 g each, contained only caffeine as the active pharmacological compound. There was significant variation in the percentage caffeine content (<2 to 96%), with four powders containing very significant caffeine contents of 87–96%.

Conclusion

This study shows that individuals are at risk of significant caffeine toxicity related to the high caffeine content of some novel psychoactive substances. Clinicians, including clinical pharmacologists, need to be aware of this to ensure that the management of acute recreational drug toxicity is appropriate and that over-correction of any hypokalaemia does not occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EMCDDA (2010) EMCDDA–Europol 2010 annual report on the implementation of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_132857_EN_EMCDDA-Europol%20Annual%20Report%202010A.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011

  2. Hillebrand J, Olszewski D, Sedefov R (2010) Legal highs on the Internet. Subst Use Misuse 45:330–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dargan PI, Sedefov R, Gallegos A, Wood DM (2011) The pharmacology and toxicology of the synthetic cathinone mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone). Drug Test Anal 3:454–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lidder S, Dargan PI, Sexton M, Button J, Ramsey J, Holt DW, Wood DM (2008) Cardiovascular toxicity associated with recreational use of diphenylprolinol (diphenyl-2-pyrrolidinemethanol (D2PM)). J Med Toxicol 4:167–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood DM, Dargan PI, Button J, Holt DW, Ovaska H, Ramsey J, Jones AL (2007) Collapse, reported seizure—and an unexpected pill. Lancet 369:1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood DM, Ramsey J, Dargan PI (2008) Detecting novel and emerging recreational drugs on the ‘club scene’. Irish Psychiatrist 9:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brandt SD, Sumnall HR, Measham F, Cole J (2010) Second generation mephedrone. The confusing case of NRG-1. BMJ 341:c3564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt SD, Freeman S, Sumnall HR, Measham F, Cole J (2011) Analysis of NRG ‘legal highs’ in the UK: identification and formation of novel cathinones. Drug Test Anal. doi:10.1002/dta.204

  9. Ramsey J, Dargan PI, Smyllie M, Davies S, Button J, Holt DW, Wood DM (2010) Buying ‘legal’ recreational drugs does not mean that you are not breaking the law. QJM 103:777–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davies S, Wood DM, Smith G, Button J, Ramsey J, Archer R, Holt DW, Dargan PI (2010) Purchasing ‘legal highs’ on the Internet–is there consistency in what you get? QJM 103:489–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger AJ, Alford K (2009) Cardiac arrest in a young man following excess consumption of caffeinated "energy drinks". Med J Aust 190:41–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seifert SM, Schaechter JL, Hershorin ER, Lipshultz SE (2011) Health effects of energy drinks on children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics 127:511–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trabulo D, Marques S, Pedroso E (2011) Caffeinated energy drink intoxication. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr.09.2010.3322

  14. Clauson KA, Shields KM, McQueen CE, Persad N (2008) Safety issues associated with commercially available energy drinks. J Am Pharm Assoc 48(3):e55–e63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reissig CJ, Strain EC, Griffiths RR (2009) Caffeinated energy drinks—a growing problem. Drug Alcohol Depend 99:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. US Dept of Health and Human Services (2010) FDA Warning Letters issued to four makers of caffeinated alcoholic beverages. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm234109.htm. Accessed 11 Aug 2011

  17. Cole C, Jones L, McVeigh J, Kicman A, Syed Q, Bellis M (2011) Adulterants in illicit drugs: a review of empirical evidence. Drug Test Anal 3:89–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Passmore AP, Kondowe GB, Johnston GD (1986) Caffeine and hypokalemia. Ann Intern Med 105:468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gennari FJ (1998) Hypokalemia. N Engl J Med 339:451–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huxtable RJ (1992) Physiological actions of taurine. Physiol Rev 72:101–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kendler BS (1989) Taurine: an overview of its role in preventive medicine. Prev Med 18:79–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. European Commission (1999) Opinion on caffeine, taurine and D-glucurono-γ-lactone as constituents of so-called "energy" drinks. http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out22_en.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011

  23. Food Standards Agency (1998) Joint Food Safety Standards Group food surveillance information sheet number 144. Survey of caffeine and other methylxanthines in energy drinks and other caffeine-containing products (updated). http://archive.food.gov.uk/maff/archive/food/infsheet/1998/no144/144caff.htm. Accessed 11 Aug 2011

  24. Shum S, Seale C, Hathaway D, Chucovich V, Beard D (1997) Acute caffeine ingestion fatalities: management issues. Vet Hum Toxicol 39:228–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leson CL, McGuigan MA, Bryson SM (1988) Caffeine over-dose in an adolescent male. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 26:407–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher AA, Davis MW (2002) Serotonin syndrome caused by selective serotonin reuptake-inhibitors-metoclopramide interaction. Ann Pharmacother 36:67–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boyer EW, Shannon M (2005) The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med 352:1112–1120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Waring WS, Laing WJ, Good AM, Malkowska AM (2009) Acute caffeine ingestion: clinical features in patients attending the emergency department and Scottish poison centre enquiries between 2000 and 2008. Scott Med J 54:3–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Wood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, S., Lee, T., Ramsey, J. et al. Risk of caffeine toxicity associated with the use of ‘legal highs’ (novel psychoactive substances). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68, 435–439 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-011-1144-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-011-1144-y

Keywords

Navigation