Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The importance of tocolysis has been discussed extensively. Beta-2 adrenoceptor agonistic drugs like ritodrine have been the reference tocolytic drugs in most countries. Cardiovascular side-effects are frequent. Atosiban, a newer tocolytic drug, is a competitive antagonist of oxytocin and has fewer cardiovascular side effects. Although large studies exist, there is mainly subjective reporting of adverse reactions with a focus on blood pressure data.

Objectives

Evaluation of the acute effects of therapeutic doses of ritodrine and atosiban in comparison to placebo on central and peripheral blood pressures, central-to-peripheral blood pressure amplification and the augmentation index (AIx) in healthy non-pregnant female volunteers.

Methods

A double-blind, randomized, crossover trial was carried out in 20 healthy non-pregnant female volunteers. Hemodynamic measurements were performed under standardized conditions.

Results

At steady state, central and peripheral pressures did not differ from placebo in the atosiban group. During ritodrine -infusion, central SBP increased by 11% versus placebo (p = 0.012) and peripheral SBP by 10% (p = 0.004). In contrast to atosiban and placebo, blood pressure amplification was absent in the ritodrine group. While the AIx did not change in the atosiban group, with ritodrine, the AIx tended to decrease.

Conclusions

The present study shows the significant effects of ritodrine on the cardiovascular system. Atosiban has no significant effects and may be an appropriate alternative to tocolyticum, particularly in cardiovascularly complicated pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wex J, Connolly M, Rath W (2009) Atosiban versus betamimetics in the treatment of preterm labour in Germany: an economic evaluation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9:23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alouini S (2009) Adverse reactions to tocolytics. No to beta agonists for tocolysis. BMJ 338:b1502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Heus R, Mol BW, Erwich JJ, van Geijn HP, Gyselaers WJ, Hanssens M, Harmark L, van Holsbeke CD, Duvekot JJ, Schobben FF, Wolf H, Visser GH (2009) Adverse drug reactions to tocolytic treatment for preterm labour: prospective cohort study. BMJ 338:b744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caughey AB, Parer JT (2001) Tocolysis with beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. Semin Perinatol 25:248–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shim JY, Park YW, Yoon BH, Cho YK, Yang JH, Lee Y, Kim A (2006) Multicentre, parallel group, randomised, single-blind study of the safety and efficacy of atosiban versus ritodrine in the treatment of acute preterm labour in Korean women. BJOG 113:1228–1234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shubert PJ (1995) Atosiban. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38:722–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan J, Cabrol D, Ingemarsson I, Marsal K, Moutquin JM, Fisk NM (2006) Pragmatic comparison of beta2-agonist side effects within the Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta Agonists study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 128:135–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stergiotou I, Talbot F, Yoong W (2007) The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:927–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferriols LR, Nicolas PJ, Alos AM (2005) [Pharmacoeconomic assessment of two tocolysis protocols for the inhibition of premature delivery]. Farm Hosp 29:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. French/Australian Atosiban Investigators Group (2001) Treatment of preterm labor with the oxytocin antagonist atosiban: a double-blind, randomized, controlled comparison with salbutamol. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  11. Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta-agonists Study Group (2001) Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labour. BJOG 108:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Atosiban Study Group (2001) The oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus the beta-agonist terbutaline in the treatment of preterm labor. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:413–422

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Okin PM, Lee ET, Wang W, Umans JG, Calhoun D, Howard BV (2009) High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome the strong heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1730–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McEniery CM, Yasmin, McDonnell B, Munnery M, Wallace SM, Rowe CV, Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB (2008) Central pressure: variability and impact of cardiovascular risk factors: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial II. Hypertension 51:1476–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Avolio AP, Van Bortel LM, Boutouyrie P, Cockcroft JR, McEniery CM, Protogerou AD, Roman MJ, Safar ME, Segers P, Smulyan H (2009) Role of pulse pressure amplification in arterial hypertension: experts' opinion and review of the data. Hypertension 54:375–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Bortel LM, Duprez D, Starmans-Kool MJ, Safar ME, Giannattasio C, Cockcroft J, Kaiser DR, Thuillez C (2002) Clinical applications of arterial stiffness, Task Force III: recommendations for user procedures. Am J Hypertens 15:445–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsatsaris V, Carbonne B, Papatsonis D, Goffinet F (2000) Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor; a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:618–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Papatsonis DN, van Geijn HP, Ader HJ, Lange FM, Bleker OP, Dekker GA (1997) Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol 90:230–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasmussen BB, Larsen LS, Senderovitz T (2005) Pharmacokinetic interaction studies of atosiban with labetalol or betamethasone in healthy female volunteers. BJOG 112:1492–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerris J, Thiery M, Bogaert M, De SA (1980) Randomized trial of two beta-mimetic drugs (ritodrine and fenoterol) in acute intra-partum tocolysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 18:443–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vanmolkot FH, Van Bortel LM, de Hoon JN (2007) Altered arterial function in migraine of recent onset. Neurology 68:1563–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bos WJ, Verrij E, Vincent HH, Westerhof BE, Parati G, van Montfrans GA (2007) How to assess mean blood pressure properly at the brachial artery level. J Hypertens 25:751–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M (1989) Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation 80:1652–1659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly R, Fitchett D (1992) Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:952–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Bortel LM, Balkestein EJ, van Der Heijden-Spek JJ, Vanmolkot FH, Staessen JA, Kragten JA, Vredeveld JW, Safar ME, Struijker Boudier HA, Hoeks AP (2001) Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking. J Hypertens 19:1037–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chemla D, Hebert JL, Aptecar E, Mazoit JX, Zamani K, Frank R, Fontaine G, Nitenberg A, Lecarpentier Y (2002) Empirical estimates of mean aortic pressure: advantages, drawbacks and implications for pressure redundancy. Clin Sci (Lond) 103:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Bekaert S, Segers P, De Bacquer D, Cooman L, Van Damme P, Cassiman P, Langlois M, Van Oostveldt P, Verdonck P, De Backer G, Gillebert TC, Asklepios Investigators (2007) Rationale, design, methods and baseline characteristics of the Asklepios Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14:179–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen CH, Ting CT, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass DA, Pak P, Wang SP, Chang MS, Yin FC (1996) Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. Hypertension 27:168–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Millasseau SC, Patel SJ, Redwood SR, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ (2003) Pressure wave reflection assessed from the peripheral pulse: is a transfer function necessary? Hypertension 41:1016–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, Cockcroft JR, Newby DE, Webb DJ (2000) The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol 525:263–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Papatsonis DN, van Geijn HP, Bleker OP, Ader HJ, Dekker GA (2003) Hemodynamic and metabolic effects after nifedipine and ritodrine tocolysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:5–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goodwin TM, Valenzuela G, Silver H, Hayashi R, Creasy GW, Lane R (1996) Treatment of preterm labor with the oxytocin antagonist atosiban. Am J Perinatol 13:143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goodwin TM, Millar L, North L, Abrams LS, Weglein RC, Holland ML (1995) The pharmacokinetics of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban in pregnant women with preterm uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:913–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moutquin JM, Sherman D, Cohen H, Mohide PT, Hochner-Celnikier D, Fejgin M, Liston RM, Dansereau J, Mazor M, Shalev E, Boucher M, Glezerman M, Zimmer EZ, Rabinovici J (2000) Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor: a multicenter effectiveness and safety study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1191–1199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cekici L, Valipour A, Kohansal R, Burghuber OC (2009) Short-term effects of inhaled salbutamol on autonomic cardiovascular control in healthy subjects: a placebo-controlled study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 67:394–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smulyan H, Mukherjee R, Sheehe PR, Safar ME (2010) Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification. Am Heart J 159:399–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Waring WS, Sinclair HM, Webb DJ (2006) Effects of salbutamol and glyceryl trinitrate on large arterial stiffness are similar between patients with hypertension and adults with normal blood pressure. Br J Clin Pharmacol 62:621–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Husslein P, Quartarolo JP (2003) Review of clinical experience with atosiban and the Tractocile Efficacy Assessment Survey in Europe (TREASURE) study protocol. Int J Clin Pract 57:121–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Papatsonis D, Flenady V, Cole S, Liley H (2005) Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD004452

  40. Mahieu D, Kips J, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Verbeke F, Gillebert TC, De Backer GG, De Bacquer D, Verdonck P, Van Bortel LM, Segers P (2010) Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods. J Hypertens 28:300–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hayward CS, Kraidly M, Webb CM, Collins P (2002) Assessment of endothelial function using peripheral waveform analysis: a clinical application. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:521–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. O'Rourke MF (1999) Mechanical principles. Arterial stiffness and wave reflection. Pathol Biol (Paris) 47:623–633

    Google Scholar 

  43. Leduc L, Wasserstrum N, Spillman T, Cotton DB (1991) Baroreflex function in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:886–890

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vesalainen RK, Ekholm EM, Jartti TT, Tahvanainen KU, Kaila TJ, Erkkola RU (1999) Effects of tocolytic treatment with ritodrine on cardiovascular autonomic regulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:238–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF (2005) McDonald's blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental, and clinical principles, 5th ed. Hodder Arnold, London

  46. Van Bortel LM, Mahieu D, De Backer T (2008) Measurement of central aortic blood pressure. In: Laurent S, Cockroft J (eds) Central aortic blood pressure. Elsevier Masson SAS, Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, pp 35–40

  47. Segers P, Mahieu D, Kips J, Rietzschel E, De Buyzere M, De Bacquer D, Bekaert S, De Backer G, Gillebert T, Verdonck P, Van Bortel L (2009) Amplification of the pressure pulse in the upper limb in healthy, middle-aged men and women. Hypertension 54:414–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Benedetti TJ (1983) Maternal complications of parenteral beta-sympathomimetic therapy for premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Duvekot JJ, Peeters LL (1994) Maternal cardiovascular hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49:S1–S14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schneider KT, Deckardt R (1991) The implication of upright posture on pregnancy. J Perinat Med 19:121–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F (2001) The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev 81:629–683

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mitchell BF, Schmid B (2001) Oxytocin and its receptor in the process of parturition. J Soc Gynecol Investig 8:122–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bussen SS, Sutterlin MW, Steck T (1998) Plasma renin activity and aldosterone serum concentration are decreased in severe preeclampsia but not in the HELLP-syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77:609–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Anton L, Brosnihan KB (2008) Systemic and uteroplacental renin-angiotensin system in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2:349–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lamont RF (2000) The pathophysiology of pulmonary oedema with the use of beta-agonists. BJOG 107:439–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all included subjects; Mr. Dries Mahieu, Mrs. Tine De Backer, Mrs. Fabienne De Boeck, Mrs. Griet Van Lancker, Mrs. Charline Wehlou, Mr. Marc Twagirumukiza, and Mr. Jan Kips for the blinded medication preparation; and the staff of the Drug Research Unit Ghent for their excellent technical support and know-how.

Trial Number

EudractNr: 2008-000845-76

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Fabry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fabry, I., De Paepe, P., Kips, J. et al. Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67, 11–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0926-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0926-y

Keywords

Navigation