Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Management Plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety?

  • Special Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In 2005, new European legislation authorised Regulatory Agencies to require drug companies to submit a risk management plan (RMP) comprising detailed commitments for post-marketing pharmacovigilance. The aim of the study is to describe the characteristics of RMP for 15 drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and their impact on post-marketing safety issues.

Methods

Of the 90 new Chemical Entities approved through a centralised procedure by the EMA during 2006 and 2007, 15 of them were selected and their safety aspects and relative RMPs analysed. All post-marketing communications released for safety reasons related to these drugs were also considered.

Results

A total of 157 safety specifications were established for the drugs assessed. Risk minimisation activities were foreseen for 5 drugs as training activities. Post-marketing safety issues emerged for 12 of them, leading to 39 type II variations in Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). Nearly half of such variations, 19 (49%), concerned safety aspects not envisaged by the RMPs. Besides this, 9 Safety Communications were published for 6 out of 15 drugs assessed.

Conclusion

The present study reveals several critical points on the way RMPs have been implemented. Several activities proposed by the RMPs do not appear to be adequate in dealing with the potential risks of drugs. Poor communication of risk to practitioners and to the public, and above all limited transparency for the total assessment of risk, seem to transform RMPs into a tool to reassure the public when inadequately evaluated drugs are granted premature marketing authorisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eichler HG, Abadie E, Raine J, Salmonson T (2009) Safe drugs and the cost of good intentions. N Engl J Med 360:1378–1380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garattini S, Chalmers I (2009) Patients and the public deserve big changes in evaluation of drugs. BMJ 338:804–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EudraLex, vol 9A. Pharmacovigilance guidelines. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol9_en.htm. Accessed 26 May 2009

  4. Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Straus SMJM, Egberts TCG, Blauckburn S et al (2009) Evaluation of post-authorization safety studies in the first cohort of EU Risk Management Plans at time of regulatory approval. Drug Saf 32:1175–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. EPARs for authorised medicinal products for human use. www.emea.europa.eu/htms/human/epar/a.htm

  6. Human Medicines Product Safety Announcements. www.emea.europa.eu/htms/human/drugalert/drugalert.htm

  7. MHRA-CHM (2009) Exenatide (Byetta): risk of severe pancreatitis and renal failure. MHRA Drug Saf Update 8:6–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Byetta (exenatide) (2008) FDA Drug Safety Newsletter 2:12–14 www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2007/

  9. Garattini S, Bertelé V (2010) Europe’s opportunity to open up drug regulation. BMJ 340:842–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Proposed Directive: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0665:FIN:EN:PDF

  11. Proposed Regulation: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0664:FIN:EN:PDF

  12. EU Commission’s proposals on pharmacovigilance dismantle the entire system (2009) Joint position of AIM, ESIP, HAI Europe, ISDB, MiEF. Available at www.isdbweb.org/

  13. Avorn J (2007) Paying for drug approvals. Who’s using whom? N Engl J Med 356:1697–1700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garattini S, Bertele V (2007) How can we regulate medicines better? BMJ 335:803–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Maria Font Pous (MFP) is an expert on drug information and former President of the International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB). Serena Frau (SF) is member of the editorial board of an independent drug bulletin that regularly assesses drugs. MFP and SF have designed the study and developed part of the analysis. Anita Conforti (AC) is an expert in pharmacovigilance in the Veneto Region and a reviewer for the WHO collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring Center (Uppsala). Maria Rosa Luppino (MRL) is an expert in pharmacovigilance and drug information. AC and MRL developed part of the data analysis. All the authors have reviewed and approved the final draft. MFP is the guarantor.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Font Pous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frau, S., Font Pous, M., Luppino, M.R. et al. Risk Management Plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety?. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66, 785–790 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0848-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0848-8

Keywords

Navigation