Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine 8 mg with daytime or nighttime dosing

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Diurnal variation can affect drug pharmacokinetics. Fesoterodine is a new antimuscarinic drug for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). We estimated the relative bioavailability of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active metabolite of fesoterodine, following nighttime and daytime administration.

Methods

In this randomized, open-label, two–period, two–treatment crossover, single-dose study, healthy subjects received daytime and nighttime oral dosing of fesoterodine 8-mg sustained-release tablets, separated by a minimum 60-h washout period. Blood samples for 5–HMT PK determination were collected before dosing and at specified intervals up to 48 h postdose. Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reports.

Results

Fourteen subjects completed the study. Plasma concentration versus time profiles (AUC) of 5-HMT were similar for daytime and nighttime dosing. Mean \( AU{C_\infty } \) 5-HMT values were 47.9 and 51.4 ng h/mL for nighttime and daytime dosing, respectively; the mean time to reach maximum concentration (Cmax) values were 3.9 and 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. Nighttime versus daytime \( AU{C_\infty } \) and Cmax ratios of 5-HMT were 93 and 79%, respectively; 90% confidence intervals (CIs) indicated equivalence for \( AU{C_\infty } \) but not for Cmax. The median time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) was 5.0 h for both dosing regimens, and the mean terminal elimination half-life (T½) was 5.9 and 5.7 h for nighttime and daytime dosing, respectively. Seven treatment-related AEs, most commonly headache, occurred in five subjects.

Conclusions

The AUC values for daytime and nighttime administration of fesoterodine were equivalent. The 21% reduction in the Cmax for nighttime dosing is unlikely to be clinically relevant. No safety issues were apparent. These results support both daytime and nighttime administration of fesoterodine for OAB treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61(1):37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams P, Artibani W, Cardozo L et al (2006) Reviewing the ICS 2002 terminology report: the ongoing debate. Neurourol Urodyn 25:293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Milsom I, Abrams P, Cardozo L et al (2001) How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. Br J Urol Int 87(9):760–766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW et al (2003) Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol 20(6):327–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carr LK (2008) Overactive bladder. Can J Urol 15[Suppl 1]:32–36 discussion 36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A et al (2007) Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 52(4):1204–1212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitti V, Dmochowski R, Sand P et al (2007) Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. J Urol 178:2488–2494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michel MC (2008) Fesoterodine: a novel muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother 9(10):1787–1796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tubaro A, De Nunzio C (2004) Comparison of peripherally active substance for treatment of detrusor overactivity: what is new; what is in the pipeline. EAU Update Ser 2(4):161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole P (2004) Fesoterodine, an advanced antimuscarinic for the treatment of overactive bladder: a safety update. Drugs Future 29(7):715–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malhotra B, Sachse R, Wood N (2009) Influence of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 47(6):384–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baraldo M (2008) The influence of circadian rhythms on the kinetics of drugs in humans. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4(2):175–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatlebakk JG, Katz PO, Kuo B et al (1998) Nocturnal gastric acidity and acid breakthrough on different regimens of omeprazole 40 mg daily. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12(12):1235–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pehlivanov ND, Olyaee M, Sarosiek I et al (2003) Comparison of morning and evening administration of rabeprazole for gastro-oesophageal reflux and nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough in patients with reflux disease: a double-blind, cross-over study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18(9):883–890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta SK, Sathayan G (1999) Pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day controlled-release oxybutynin formulation compared with immediate-release oxybutynin. J Clin Pharmacol 39:289–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rackley R, Weiss JP, Rovner ES et al (2006) Nighttime dosing with tolterodine reduces overactive bladder-related nocturnal micturitions in patients with overactive bladder and nocturia. Urology 67(4):731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2007) Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Review application NDA 22-103. Silver Spring, MD

  18. May K, Westphal K, Giessmann T et al (2008) Disposition and antimuscarinic effects of the urinary bladder spasmolytics propiverine: influence of dosage forms and circadian-time rhythms. J Clin Pharmacol 48(5):570–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDiarmid S, Sandage BW Jr, Malhotra BK (2008) The effects of reformulation: improved therapeutic index. Curr Urol Rep 9(6):465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. (2003) Guidance for industry: bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general consideration. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Rockville

  21. Olsson B, Szamosi J (2001) Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of a new once daily extended release tolterodine formulation versus immediate release tolterodine. Clin Pharmacokinet 40(3):227–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson RU, Mobley D, Blank B et al (1999) Once daily controlled versus immediate release oxybutynin chloride for urge urinary incontinence. OROS Oxybutynin Study Group. J Urol 161(6):1809–1812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Kerrebroeck P, Kreder K, Jonas U et al (2001) Tolterodine once-daily: superior efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of the overactive bladder. Urology 57(3):414–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Versi E, Appell R, Mobley D et al (2000) Dry mouth with conventional and controlled-release oxybutynin in urinary incontinence. The Ditropan XL Study Group. Obstet Gynecol 95(5):718–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Junemann KP, Hessdorfer E, Unamba-Oparah I et al (2006) Propiverine hydrochloride immediate and extended release: comparison of efficacy and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder. Urol Int 77(4):334–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sathyan G, Chancellor MB, Gupta SK (2001) Effect of OROS controlled-release delivery on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxybutynin chloride. Br J Clin Pharmacol 52(4):409–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanctura (trospium chloride) (2007) Full prescribing information. Allergan, Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dmochowski RR, Peters KM, Morrow JD et al (2009) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of flexible-dose fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Urology (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wyndaele JJ, Goldfischer ER, Morrow JD et al (2009) Effects of flexible-dose fesoterodine on overactive bladder symptoms and treatment satisfaction: an open-label study. Int J Clin Pract 63(4):560–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Editorial assistance was provided by Tiffany Brake, PhD, from Complete Healthcare Communications, Inc., and was funded by Pfizer Inc, who also funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimal K. Malhotra.

Additional information

ClinicalStudyResults.org Protocol No. A0221062.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malhotra, B.K., Crownover, P.H., LaBadie, R. et al. The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine 8 mg with daytime or nighttime dosing. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66, 171–176 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0748-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0748-y

Keywords

Navigation