Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Equal access to treatment? Population-based follow-up of drugs dispensed to patients after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

The establishment of national guidelines is one approach to creating equity in terms of access to care, and both internationally and in Sweden, guidelines have been developed for coronary heart disease. We have analysed drug treatment in Sweden according to national guidelines after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim was to investigate whether there are differences between population groups according to sex, education, country of birth and diabetes.

Methods

Information was obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register on drugs dispensed between July and October 2005 for incident cases of AMI during the period 2003–2004 (n = 28,168). Data on socio-economic and demographic conditions were included. Dispensed drugs after AMI were compared to the recommended drug treatment according to Swedish and European guidelines – acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), β-blockers, lipid-lowering drugs and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors).

Results

We found that, in general, there were only small differences between the sexes and between educational groups. The greatest differences were found in comparisons between regions of birth. In particular, foreign-born patients resident in Sweden but originally from outside the EU25 countries used fewer drugs than Swedish-born patients. The OR (odds ratio) for ASA was 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.85], for β-blockers, 0.72 (0.63–0.83), for lipid-lowering drugs, 0.75 (0.65–0.86) and for ACE inhibitors, 0.76 (0.67–0.86).

Conclusions

In general, we found only slight differences – or none at all – between population groups in terms of drug treatment after AMI. Only among immigrants from outside the EU25 countries was there a tendency towards a lesser use of the recommended drugs according to the national guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosén M (1988) Epidemiological measures in planning: observations from Sweden. Int J Health Plan Manage 3:261–270

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haglund B (1994) Vård på lika villkor (Equal access to care) (in Swedish). EpC-report 1994:3. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm

  3. Hjern A, Haglund B, Persson G, Rosén M (2001) Is there equity in access to health services for ethnic minorities in Sweden? Eur J Public Health 11:147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead M, Evandrou M, Haglund B, Diderichsen F (1997) As the health divide widens in Sweden and Britain, what’s happening to access to care? Br Med J 315:1006–1009

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haglund B, Köster M, Nilsson T, Rosén M (2004) Inequality in access to coronary revascularization in Sweden. Scand Cardiovasc J 38:334–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hjern A, Haglund B, Rasmussen F, Rosén M (2000) Socio-economic differences in daycare arrangements and use of medical care and antibiotics in Swedish preschool children. Acta Paediatr 89:1250–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gorecka K, Linhartova A, Vlcek J, Tilser I (2005) Cardiovascular drug utilisation and socio-economic inequalities in 20 districts of the Czech Republic. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61:417–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stocks NP, Ryan P, McElroy H, Allan J (2004). Statin prescribing in Australia: socioeconomic and sex differences. A cross-sectional study. Med J Aust 180:229–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Melander E, Nissen A, Henricson K et al (2003) Utilisation of antibiotics in young children: opposite relationships to adult educational level in Danish and Swedish counties. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tobi H, Meijer WM, Tuinstra J, de Jong-van den Berg LT (2003) Socio-economic differences in prescription and OTC drug use in Dutch adolescents. Pharm World Sci 25:203–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson DG, Borgquist L (1998) Effects of user charges on the use of prescription medicines in different socio-economic groups. Health Policy 44:123–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K et al (2003) European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab 10[Suppl 1]:S1–S78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (2004) Socialstyrelsens riktlinjer för hjärtsjukvård (Guidelines on cardiovascular disease) (in Swedish). The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm

  14. Opolka JL, Rascati KL, Brown CM, Gibson PJ (2004) Ethnicity and prescription patterns for haloperidol, risperidone, and olazapine. Psychiatr Serv 55:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuno E, Rothbard AB (2002) Racial disparities in antipsychotic prescription patterns for patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 159:567–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaccarino V, Rathore SS, Wenger NK et al (2005) Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. N Engl J Med 353:671–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Canto JG, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI et al (2000) Relation of race and sex to the use of reperfusion therapy in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 342:1094–1100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rathore SS, Berger AK, Weinfurt KP et al (2000) Race, sex, poverty, and the medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Circulation 102:642–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. EUROASPIRE II Study Group (2001) Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries; principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J 22:554–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pyorala K, Lehto S, De Bacquer D et al (2004) Risk factor management in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. Findings from the EUROASPIRE I and II surveys. Diabetologica 47:1257–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayer O Jr, Simon J, Heidrich J, Cokkinos DV, De Baquer D, EUROASPIRE II Study Group (2004). Educational level and risk profile of cardiac patients in the EUROASPIRE II substudy. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. EUROASPIRE I and II Group (2001) Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group; European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Lancet 357:995–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eliasson M, Janlert U, Jansson JH, Stegmayr B (2006) Time trends in population cholesterol levels 1986–2004: influence of lipid-lowering drugs, obesity, smoking and educational level. The northern Sweden MONICA study. J Intern Med 260:551–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Helman CG (Ed) (2000) Culture, health and illness, 4th edn. Butterworth Heineman, Oxford

  25. Ringbäck Weitoft G, Gullberg A, Hjern A, Rosén M (1999) Mortality statistics in immigrant research: method for adjusting underestimation of mortality. Int J Epidemiol 28:756–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Ringbäck Weitoft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ringbäck Weitoft, G., Ericsson, Ö., Löfroth, E. et al. Equal access to treatment? Population-based follow-up of drugs dispensed to patients after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64, 417–424 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0425-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0425-y

Keywords

Navigation