Abstract
This review presents the definition and goals of “social pharmacology”, a new branch of clinical pharmacology, investigating relationships between drugs and society through the example of “medicamentation”, defined as the use of drugs for social problems previously not requiring drug utilisation (ageing, smoking cessation, vigilance troubles, sleep synchronisation, loss of libido, etc.). The involvement of the different “actors” from our society (patients, physicians, pharmaceutical industries, clinical pharmacologists, regulatory agencies, etc.) in this phenomenon is also discussed.
References
Vénulet J (1974) From experimental to social pharmacology: a natural history of pharmacology. Int J Clin Pharmacol 10:202–205
Vénulet J (1976) La Pharmacologie Sociale existe-t-elle?. Med Hyg 34:435–436
Montastruc JL (2002) La pharmacologie sociale: une nouvelle branche de la pharmacologie clinique. Thérapie 57:420–426
Ess SM, Schneeweiss S, Szucs TD (2003) European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure. Pharmacoeconomics 21:89–103
Heffler S, Smith S et al (2002) Health spending projections for 2001–2011: the latest outlook. Health Aff (Bethesda) 21(2):207–218
Monde L (2003) Le gouvernement Francais a annoncé le 19 Avril, la baisse du taux de remboursement de 617 medicaments. Le Monde 2003 23 avril 2003
Docteur E, Oxley H (2003) Systèmes de santé: la rationalité économique à l’ordre du jour. L’Observateur de l’OCDE:18
Rosenthal MB, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, Frank RG, Epstein AM (2002) Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N Engl J Med 346:498–505
Buclin T, Biollaz J (2004) DTC: new achievements for an old doping agent. Med Hyg 62:677–681
Mitrany D (2001) Lifestyle drugs: determining their value and who should pay. Pharmacoeconomics 19:441–448
Audit commission (1994) A prescription for improvement: towards more rational prescribing in general practice. HMSO, London
Greenhalgh T, Gill P (1997) Pressure to prescribe. BMJ 315:1482–1483
Bradley C (1992) Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general paractitioners. Br J Gen Pract 42:454–458
Britten N, Ukoumunne O (1997) The influence of patients’ hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors’ perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 315:1506–1510
Delga C, Megnin Y, Oustric S, Laurent C, Pauly L, Vergez JP et al (2003) A pilot study in general practice: pressure to prescribe. Therapie 58:513–517
Illich I (1975) Némésis medicale. Le Seuil ed, Paris
Leriol M (2003) Faire exister une maladie contreversée: les associations de malades du syndrome de fatigue chronique et internet. Sciences Sociales et Santé 21:5–33
Hollon MF (1999) Direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription drugs: creating consumer demand. JAMA 281:382–384
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (2002) New medicines in development for mental illness. Available at: http://www.pharma.org/newmedecines/surveys.cfm?newmedsrindex=54
Zarifian E (1998) Prescription of psychotropic drugs; use, misuse and abuse. Bull Acad Natl Med 182:1439–1446 (discussion pp1446–1447)
Smith R (2002) In search of “non-disease”. BMJ 324:883–885
Cohen D, Mc Cubin M, Collin J, Pérodeau G (2001) Medications as social phenomena. Health 5:441–469
Taylor D (2003) Fewer new drugs from the pharmaceutical industry. BMJ 326:408–409
Moynihan R (2004) Controversial disease dropped from Prozac product information. Br Med J 328:365
Flower R (2004) Lifestyle drugs: pharmacology and the social agenda. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:182–185
Forkner-Dunn J (2003) Internet-based patient self-care: the next generation of health care delivery. J Med Internet Res 5:28
Breggin PDC (1999) Your drug may be your problem: how and why to stop taking psychiatric medications. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mbongue, T.B.N., Sommet, A., Pathak, A. et al. “Medicamentation” of society, non-diseases and non-medications: a point of view from social pharmacology. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61, 309–313 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-005-0925-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-005-0925-6