Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Large-scale spatial variation in epilithic algal matrix cryptofaunal assemblages on the Great Barrier Reef

  • Short note
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial variation in the epilithic algal matrix (EAM) cryptofauna was investigated at three locations on the Great Barrier Reef: two inner shelf—Orpheus Island and the Turtle Island group—and a mid-shelf location, Lizard Island. Although the EAM appears to be a relatively simple and consistent habitat, significant differences in cryptofaunal assemblages were found between locations. EAM assemblages from Orpheus Island were markedly different. This appears to be a function of the sediment profile characteristics (grain size >60 µm) at Orpheus Island, as many cryptofaunal taxa displayed positive relationships with sediment volume. However, sediment volumes did not differ significantly between the three locations, highlighting the possibility of cyclonic activity affecting the sediment profile at Orpheus Island in the months preceding the study, in addition to the nutrient input from major terrigenous sources. The results of this study show that EAM cryptofaunal assemblages are not uniform across the Great Barrier Reef and suggest that dissolved nutrients, sediment loads and distance from river systems may be significant drivers of cryptobenthic faunal compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bainbridge ZT, Wolanski E, Álvarez-Romero JG, Lewis SE, Brodie JE (2012) Fine sediment and nutrient dynamics related to particle size and floc formation in a Burdekin River flood plume, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 65:236–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beattle AJ, Oliver I (1994) Taxonomic minimalism. Trends Ecol Evol 9:488–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Fulton CJ (2008) Sediment-mediated suppression of herbivory on coral reefs: decreasing resilience to rising sea levels and climate change? Limnol Oceanogr 53:2695–2701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Wainwright P (2001) Locomotion in labrid fishes: implications for habitat use and cross-shelf biogeography on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 20:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nystrom M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birrell CL, McCook LJ, Willis BL (2005) Effects of algal turfs and sediment on coral settlement. Mar Pollut Bull 51:408–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaldo R, Bellwood D (2011) Spatial variation in the effects of grazing on epilithic algal turfs on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 30:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie J, Schroeder T, Rohde K, Faithful J, Masters B, Dekker A, Brando V, Maughan M (2010) Dispersal of suspended sediments and nutrients in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon during river-discharge events: conclusions from satellite remote sensing and concurrent flood-plume sampling. Mar Fresh Res 61:651–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connell SD, Foster MS, Airoldi L (2014) What are algal turfs? Towards a better description of turfs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 495:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TF, Uthicke S, Humphrey C, Fabricius KE (2007) Gradients in water column nutrients, sediment parameters, irradiance and coral reef development in the Whitsunday Region, central Great Barrier Reef. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 74:458–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman DJ, Choat JH, Clements KD, Hardy T, Jason M (2001) Detritus as food for grazing fishes on coral reefs. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1596–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin MJ, Brodie J (2005) Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behavior in coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 51:9–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin M, Brodie J, Bainbridge Z, Lewis S (2008) Flood plumes in the GBR: the Burdekin and Fitzroy flood plumes, 2007/08—case studies for marine monitoring program. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville

  • Done TJ (1982) Patterns in the distribution of coral communities across the central Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 1:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius K, De’ath G (2001) Environmental factors associated with the spatial distribution of crustose coralline algae on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 19:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox RJ, Bellwood DR (2007) Quantifying herbivory across a coral reef depth gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagan M, Sandstrom M, Chivas A (1987) Restricted terrestrial carbon input to the continental shelf during Cyclone Winifred: implications for terrestrial runoff to the Great Barrier Reef Province. Coral Reefs 6:113–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagan MK, Chivas AR, Herczeg AL (1990) Shelf-wide erosion, deposition, and suspended sediment tranport during Cyclone Winifred, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. J Sediment Petrol 60:456–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology: the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Goatley CHR, Bellwood DR (2011) The roles of dimensionality, canopies and complexity in ecosystem monitoring. PLoS One 6:e27307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2011) Impacts of tropical cyclone Yasi on the Great Barrier Reef: a report on the findings of a rapid ecological impact assessment, July 2011, GBRMPA, Townsville

  • Green AL, Bellwood DR (2009) Monitoring functional groups of herbivorous reef fishes as indicators of coral reef resilience—a practical guide for coral reef managers in the Asia Pacific region. In: IUCN working group on climate change and Coral Reefs. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

  • Harrell FE (2014) The Hmisc Package. R package version 3.14-4. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/

  • Hayes J, Goonetilleke A (2012) Building community resilience—learning from the 2011 floods in Southeast Queensland, Australia. In: Kakimoto R, Yamada F (eds) 8th annual conference of international institutes for infrastructure, renewal and reconstruction: international conference on disaster management, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan pp 51–60

  • Hoey A, Bellwood D (2008) Cross-shelf variation in the role of parrotfishes on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 27:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GEL, Attrill MJ, Sheehan EV, Somerfield PJ (2007) Recovery of meiofauna communities following mudflat disturbance by trampling associated with crab-tiling. Mar Environ Res 64:409–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy A, Jacoby C (1999) Biological indicators of marine environmental health: meiofauna—a neglected benthic component? Environ Monit Assess 54:47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp DW, McKinnon AD (1992) Community structure, biomass and productivity of epilithic algal communities on the Great Barrier Reef: dynamics at different spatial scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 86:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp DW, McKinnon AD, Mundy CN (1988) Motile cryptofauna of a coral reef—abundance, distribution and trophic potential. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 45:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer MJ, Bellwood DR, Bellwood O (2012) Cryptofauna of the epilithic algal matrix on an inshore coral reef, Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 31:1007–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer MJ, Bellwood O, Bellwood DR (2013) The trophic importance of algal turfs for coral reef fishes: the crustacean link. Coral Reefs 32:575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell F-T (2004) Parataxonomy versus taxonomy in biodiversity studies—pitfalls and applicability of ‘morphospecies’ sorting. Biodivers Conserv 13:795–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon FJ, Kuhnert PM, Henderson BL, Wilkinson SN, Kinsey-Henderson A, Abbott B, Brodie JE, Turner RDR (2012) River loads of suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus and herbicides delivered to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Mar Pollut Bull 65:167–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logan D, Townsend KA, Townsend K, Tibbetts IR (2008) Meiofauna sediment relations in leeward slope turf algae of Heron Island reef. Hydrobiologia 610:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ (1996) Effects of herbivores and water quality on Sargassum distribution on the central Great Barrier Reef: cross-shelf transplants. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 139:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch M, Fallon S, Wyndham T, Hendy E, Lough J, Barnes D (2003) Coral record of increased sediment flux to the inner Great Barrier Reef since European settlement. Nature 421:727–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna PA, Blanchard GF, Dinet A (1995) Effect of production and biomass of intertidal microphytobenthos on meiofaunal grazing rates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 185:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil DT, Orpin AR, Ridd PV, Yu B (2002) Sediment yield and impacts from river catchments to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon: a review. Mar Fresh Res 53:733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Peter Solymos M, Stevens HH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-7. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html

  • Preston NP, Doherty PJ (1994) Cross-shelf patterns in the community structure of coral-dwelling crustacea in the central region of the Great Barrier Reef II. cryptofauna. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 104:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CS (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 62:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert EE, Fox RS, Barnes RD (2004) Invertebrate zoology: a functional evolutionary approach. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, McCook LJ (1999) Potential effects of a cyclone on benthic algal production and yield to grazers on coral reefs across the central Great Barrier Reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schratzberger M, Gee JM, Rees HL, Boyd SE, Wall CM (2000) The structure and taxonomic composition of sublittoral meiofauna assemblages as an indicator of the status of marine environments. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80:969–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott FJ, Russ GR (1987) Effects of grazing on species composition of the epilithic algal community on coral reefs of the central Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 39:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman KM, Coull BC (1980) The response of meiofauna to sediment disturbance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 46:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. Am Nat 133:240–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uthicke S, Altenrath C (2010) Water column nutrients control growth and C: N ratios of symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Limnol Oceanogr 55:1681–1696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uthicke S, Nobes K (2008) Benthic Foraminifera as ecological indicators for water quality on the Great Barrier Reef. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 78:763–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SK (2004) Growth, mortality and turnover rates of a small detritivorous fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 284:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SK, Bellwood DR, Choat JH, Furnas MJ (2003) Detritus in the epilithic algal matrix and its use by coral reef fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41:279–309

  • Wismer S, Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2009) Cross-shelf benthic community structure on the Great Barrier Reef: relationships between macroalgal cover and herbivore biomass. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 376:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski E, Fabricius K, Spagnol S, Brinkman R (2005) Fine sediment budget on an inner-shelf coral-fringed island, Great Barrier Reef of Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the staff of Orpheus Island and Lizard Island research stations, S Brandl, C Mirbach, J Rizzari and J Welsh for field support and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (D.R.B.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    M. J. Kramer, D. R. Bellwood & O. Bellwood

  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    M. J. Kramer & D. R. Bellwood

Authors
  1. M. J. Kramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. R. Bellwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Bellwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Kramer.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Huettel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kramer, M.J., Bellwood, D.R. & Bellwood, O. Large-scale spatial variation in epilithic algal matrix cryptofaunal assemblages on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 161, 2183–2190 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2495-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2495-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation