Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of diving behavior and foraging habitat use between chinstrap and gentoo penguins breeding in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chinstrap, Pygoscelis antarctica, and gentoo, P. papua, penguins are sympatric species that inhabit the Antarctic Peninsula. To evaluate differences in the foraging habitat of these two species, we recorded their foraging locations and diving behavior using recently developed GPS-depth data loggers. The study was conducted on King George Island, Antarctica during the chick-guarding period of both species, from December 2006 to January 2007. The area used for foraging, estimated as the 95% kernel density of dive (>5 m) locations, overlapped partially between the two species (26.4 and 68.5% of the area overlapped for chinstrap and gentoo penguins, respectively). However, the core foraging area, estimated as the 50% kernel density, was mostly separate (12.8 and 25.0% of the area overlapped for chinstrap and gentoo penguins, respectively). Chinstrap penguins tended to use off-shelf (water depth > 200 m) regions (77% of the locations for dives >5 m), whereas gentoo penguins mainly used on-shelf (water depth < 200 m) areas (71% of dive locations). The data on foraging locations, diving behavior, and bathymetry indicated that gentoo penguins often performed benthic dives (28% of dives >5 m), whereas chinstrap penguins almost always used the epipelagic/mid-water layer (96% of dives >5 m). Diving parameters such as diving bottom duration or diving efficiency differed between the species, reflecting differences in the use of foraging habitat. The diving parameters also suggested that the on-shelf benthic layer was profitable foraging habitat for gentoo penguins. Conversely, the relationship between trip duration, date, and stomach content mass suggested that the chinstrap penguins went further from the colony to forage as the season progressed, possibly reflecting a reduction in prey availability near the colony. Our results suggest that chinstrap and gentoo penguins segregated their foraging habitat in the Antarctic coastal marine environment, possibly due to inter- and intra-specific competition for common prey resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre CA (1995) Distribution and abundance of birds at Potter Peninsula, 25 de Mayo (King George) Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Mar Ornithol 23:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley DG, Ballard G, Blight LK, Ackley S, Emslie SD, Lescroël A, Olmastroni S, Townsend SE, Tynan CT, Wilson P, Woehler E (2009) Impacts of cetaceans on the structure of Southern Ocean food webs. Mar Mamm Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00337.x

  • Ainley DG, Blight LK (2009) Ecological repercussions of historical fish extraction from the Southern Ocean. Fish Fish 10:13–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley DG, Ribic CA, Ballard G, Heath S, Gaffney I, Karl BJ, Barton KJ, Wilson PR, Webb S (2004) Geographic structure of Adélie penguin populations: overlap in colony-specific foraging areas. Ecol Monogr 74:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailleul F, Luque S, Dubroca L, Arnould JPY, Guinet C (2005) Differences in foraging strategy and maternal behaviour between two sympatric fur seal species at the Crozet Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballance LT, Pitman RL, Hewitt RP, Siniff DB, Trivelpiece WZ, Clapham PJ, Brownell RL (2006) The removal of large whales from the southern ocean: evidence for long-term ecosystem effects? In: Estes JA, Demaster DP, Doak DF, Williams TM, Brownell RL (eds) Whales, Whaling, and Ocean Ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkley, pp 215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannash R (1995) Hydrodynamics of penguins–an experimental approach. In: Dann P, Norman I, Reilly P (eds) The penguins: ecology and management. Surrey Beauty and Sons Pty Limited, Chipping Norton, pp 141–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Oro ER, Marschoff ER, Casaux RJ (2000) Trends in relative abundance of fjord Notothenia rossii, Gobionotothen gibberifrons and Notothenia coriiceps at Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, after commercial fishing in the area. CCAMLR Sci 7:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bost CA, Handrich Y, Butler PJ, Fahlman A, Halsey LG, Woakes AJ, Ropert-Coudert Y (2007) Changes in dive profiles as an indicator of feeding success in king and Adélie penguins. Deep-Sea Res Part II 54:248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd I, Wanless S, Camphuysen CJ (eds) (2006) Top predators in marine ecosystems: their role in monitoring and management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton E (1991) Distribution and population structures of immature and adult Euphausia superba in the western Bransfield Strait region during the 1986–87 summer. Deep-Sea Res 38:1169–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini AR, Coria NR, Santos MM, Negrete J, Juares MA, Daneri GA (2009) Responses of Pygoscelis adeliae and P. papua populations to environmental changes at Isla 25 de Mayo (King George Island). Polar Biol 32:1427–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casaux RJ, Barrera-Oro ER (2006) Shags in Antarctica: their feeding behaviour and ecological role in the marine food web. Antarct Sci 18:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCAMLR (1997) CCAMLR ecosystem monitoring program: standard methods for monitoring studies. Commission for the conservation of Antarctic marine living resources (CCAMLR), Hobert, Australia

  • Coyle KO, Hunt GL, Decker MB, Weingarther TJ (1992) Murre foraging, epibenthic sound scattering and tidal advection over a shoal near St. George Island, Bering Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 569–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP, Davis RW, O’Connell MJ (1988) Diving patterns in relation to diet of gentoo and macaroni penguins at South Georgia. Condor 90:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP, Reid K, Prince PA (1999) Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 177:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducklow HW, Baker K, Martinson DG, Quetin LB, Ross RM, Smith RC, Stammerjohn SE, Vernet M, Fraser W (2007) Marine pelagic ecosystems: the West Antarctic Peninsula. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:67–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faraway JJ (2006) Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed Effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 153–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcada J, Trathan PN, Reid K, Murphy EJ, Croxall JP (2006) Contrasting population changes in sympatric species of penguins in association with climate warming. Global Change Biol 12:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser WR, Hofmann EE (2003) A predator’s perspective on causal links between climate change, physical forcing and ecosystem response. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 265:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW, Birkhead TR (1984) Seabird colony distribution suggest competition for food supplies during the breeding season. Nature 311:655–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gon O, Heemstra PC (eds) (1990) Fishes of the southern ocean. J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Grahamstown

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer KC, Humphreys EM, Garthe S, Hennicke J, Peters G, Grémillet D, Phillips RA, Harris MP, Wanless S (2007) Annual variation in diets, feeding locations and foraging behaviour of gannets in the North Sea: flexibility, consistency and constraint. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 338:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill HJ (1990) A new method for the measurement of Antarctic Krill Euphausia superba Dana from predator food samples. Polar Biol 10:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinke JT, Salwicka K, Trivelpiece SG, Watters GM, Trivelpiece WZ (2007) Divergent responses of Pygoscelis penguins reveal a common environmental driver. Oecologia 153:845–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL (1999) Comparison of the diets of breeding Royal Eudyptes schlengeli, and Rockhopper Eudyptes chrysocome Penguins at Macquarie Island over three years. J Zool 247:507–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL (2000) Comparative diving behaviour and segregation of the marine habitat by breeding Royal Penguins, Eudyptes schlengeli, and eastern Rockhopper Penguins, Eudyptes chrysocome filholi, at Macquarie Island. Can J Zool 78:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL, Hindell MA, Michael KJ (1997) The foraging zones of Royal Penguins during the breeding season, and their association with oceanographic features. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 153:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichii T, Bengtson JL, Boveng PL, Takao Y, Jansen JK, Hiruki-Raring LM, Cameron MF, Okamura H, Hayashi T, Naganobu M (2007) Provisioning strategies of Antarctic fur seals and chinstrap penguins produce different responses to distribution of common prey habitat. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 344:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichii T, Katayama K, Obitsu N, Ishii H, Naganobu M (1998) Occurrence of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) concentrations in the vicinity of the South Shetland Islands: relationship to environmental parameters. Deep-Sea Res Part I 45:1235–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski B (1984) Distribution and numbers of penguins in the region of King George Island, South Shetland Islands in the breeding season 1980/1981. Pol Polar Res 5:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH (2002) Effect of variation in food supply on reproduction in Gentoo (Pygoscelis papua) and Chinstrap (P. antarctica) penguins. Annual report of environmental monitoring on human impacts at the King Sejong station, Antarctica. Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute (EC PP 01 001-B2), pp 195–222 (In Korean, with English abstract)

  • Kitaysky SA, Golubova EG (2000) Climate change causes contrasting trends in reproductive performance of planktivorous and piscivorous alcids. J Anim Ecol 69:248–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lescroël A, Bost C-A (2005) Foraging under the contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:245–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligowski R (2000) Benthic feeding by krill, Euphausia superba Dana, in coastal waters off West Antarctica and in admiralty Bay, South Shetland Islands. Polar Biol 23:619–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb VJ, Amos AF, Macaulay MC, Wormuth JH (1993) Antarctic krill stock distribution and composition in the Elephant Island and King George Island areas, January-February, 1988. Polar Biol 13:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luque SP, Arnould JP, Guinet C (2008) Temporal structure of diving behaviour in sympatric Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 372:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynnes AS, Reid K, Croxall JP, Trathan PN (2002) Conflict or co-existence? Foraging distribution and competition for prey between Adélie and chinstrap penguins. Mar Biol 141:1165–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarov RR, Denys CJ (1981) Stages of sexual maturity of Euphausia superba. BIOMASS Handbook No. 11, Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), Cambridge, UK

  • Mattern T, Ellenberg U, Houston DM, Davis L (2007) Consistent foraging routes and benthic foraging behaviour in yellow-eyed penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 343:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AK, Trivelpiece WZ (2007) Cycles of Euphausia superba recruitment evident in the diet of Pygoscelid penguins and net trawls in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 30:1615–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AK, Trivelpiece WZ (2008) Chinstrap penguins alter foraging and diving behaviour in response to the size of their principal prey, Antarctic krill. Mar Biol 154:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori Y, Boyd I (2004) Segregation of foraging between two sympatric penguin species: does rate maximization make the difference? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 275:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page B, McKenzie J, Goldsworthy SD (2005) Dietary resources partitioning among sympatric New Zealand and Australian fur seals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinaud D, Weimerskirch H (2007) At-sea distribution and scale-dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study. J Anim Ecol 76:9–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponganis PJ, Van Dam RP, Marshall G, Knower T, Levenson DH (2000) Sub-ice foraging behavior of emperor penguins. J Exp Biol 203:3275–3278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakusa-Suszczewski S (1980) Environmental conditions and the functioning of Admiralty Bay (South Shetland Islands) as part of the near shore Antarctic ecosystem. Pol Polar Res 1:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Peterson SL, Peters G, Grémillet D (2004) GPS tracking a marine predator: the effect of precision, resolution and sampling rate on foraging tracks of African Penguins. Mar Biol 145:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel V, Kawaguchi S, Ward P, Litvinov F, Sushin V, Loeb V, Watkins J (2004) Krill demography and large-scale distribution in the southwest Atlantic during January/February 2000. Deep-Sea Res Part II 51:1253–1273

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeone A, Wilson RP (2003) In-depth studies of Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) foraging: can we estimate prey consumption by perturbations in the dive profile? Mar Biol 143:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfurth A, Vargas FH, Wilson RP, Spindler M, Macdonald DW (2008) Space use by foraging Galapagos penguins during chick rearing. Endangered Species Res 4:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A, Dunn NJ, Trathan PN, Croxall JP, Wilson RP, Sato K, Naito Y (2004) Krill-feeding behaviour in a chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis Antarctica) compared with fish-eating in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus): a pilot study. Mar Orn 32:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A, Dunn MJ, Trathan PN, Sato K, Naito Y, Croxall JP (2003) Foraging strategies of chinstrap penguins at Signy Island, Antarctica: importance of benthic feeding on Antarctic krill. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A, Kokubun N, Mori Y, Shin HC (2008) Krill-feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins as shown by animal-borne camera loggers. Polar Biol 31:1291–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2000) Benthic and pelagic dives: a new foraging behaviour in rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece WZ, Bengtson JL, Trivelpiece SG, Volkman NJ (1986) Foraging behaviour of gentoo and Chinstrap Penguins as determined by a new radiotelemetry techniques. Auk 103:777–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG, Volkman NJ (1987) Ecological segregation of Adélie, Gentoo, and Chinstrap penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Ecology 68:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkman NJ, Presler P, Trivelpiece W (1980) Diets of Pygoscelid penguins at King George islands, Antarctica. Condor 82:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins L, Buchholz F, Priddle J, Morris DJ, Ricketts C (1992) Variation in reproductive status of Antarctic krill swarms; evidence for a size-related sorting mechanism? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 82:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins L, Murray AWA (1998) Layers of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba: are they just long krill swarms? Mar Biol 131:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP (1995) The foraging range of penguins. In: Williams TD (ed) The penguins. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Alvarrez B, Latorre L, Adelung D, Culik B, Bannasch R (1998) The movements of gentoo penguin Pygoscelis papua from Ardley Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 19:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Peters G (1999) Foraging behaviour of the Chinstrap Penguin Pygoscelis antarctica at Ardley Island, Antarctica. Mar Ornithol 27:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood AG, Neaf-Daenzer B, Prince PA, Croxall P (2000) Quantifying habitat use in satellite-tracked pelagic seabirds: application of kernel estimation to albatross locations. J Avian Biol 31:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the members of the King Sejong Station, Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI), especially Dr. M-Y. Choe and Dr. S-H. Lee, for logistic support in the field. We are also grateful to Dr. K. Shimatani for help with data analyses, Dr. N. Yamaguchi for statistical advice with R software and Dr. T. Iwami for help identifying fish species. Anonymous reviewers provided numerous suggestions and comments that help improve the manuscript greatly. This work was conducted as an international joint research project, under the auspices of the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition and the Korea Antarctic Research Program. This study was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowship for Young Scientists to NK and a JSPS research grant (20310016) to AT. SW was supported by the program “Bio-logging Science, The University of Tokyo (UTBLS)” led by Dr. N. Miyazaki. A research grant (PM06010) from Korean Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries provided partial support for the logistics of this expedition. The Ministry of the Environment, Japan, issued the permits required to conduct this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuo Kokubun.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Garthe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kokubun, N., Takahashi, A., Mori, Y. et al. Comparison of diving behavior and foraging habitat use between chinstrap and gentoo penguins breeding in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Mar Biol 157, 811–825 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1364-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1364-1

Keywords

Navigation