Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic measurements on trees and logs: a review and analysis

  • Original
  • Published:
Wood Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acoustic technologies have been well established as material evaluation tools in the past several decades, and their use has become widely accepted in the forest products industry for online quality control and products grading. Recent research developments on acoustic sensing technology offer further opportunities to evaluate standing trees and logs for general wood quality and intrinsic wood properties. Although the concept of using acoustic velocity as an effective measure of stiffness applies to both standing trees and felled logs, the method typically used to measure acoustic velocity in trees is different from that used in logs. Consequently, there is a significant difference in measured velocity values between trees and logs. Other factors affecting tree–log velocity relationships include tree diameter, stand age, operating temperature, and wood moisture content. This paper presents the fundamentals of acoustic wave propagation in trees and logs and discusses two different mechanisms of acoustic velocity measurement, time-of-flight for standing trees and resonance for logs. Experimental data from previous studies are reviewed and analyzed to examine the strength of the tree–log velocity relationships and discuss the factors that influence tree velocity deviation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews MK (2003) Which acoustic speed? In: Proceedings, 13th international symposium on nondestructive testing of wood, 19–21 Aug 2002, Berkeley, CA. pp 159–165

  • Bodig J, Goodman JR (1973) Prediction of elastic parameters for wood. Wood Sci 5(4):249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodig J, Jayne BA (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter P, Briggs D, Ross RJ, Wang X (2005) Acoustic testing to enhance western forest values and meet customer wood quality needs. PNW-GTR-642. In: Harrington CA, Schoenholtz SH (eds) Productivity of western forests: A forest products focus. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, pp 121–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan SS, Walker JCF (2006) Variation in acoustic velocity and density with age, and their interrelationships in radiata pine. Forest Ecol Manag 229:388–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabianowski M, Manley B, Walker JCF (2006) Acoustic measurements on standing trees, logs and green lumber. Wood Sci Technol 40:205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris PD, Andrews MK (1999) Tools and acoustic techniques for measuring wood stiffness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd wood quality symposium: emerging technologies for evaluating wood quality for processing, Forest Industry Engineering Association, Rotorua, New Zealand

  • Harris P, Petherick R, Andrews M (2002) Acoustic resonance tools. In: Proceedings, 13th international symposium on nondestructive testing of wood, 19–21 Aug 2002, Berkeley, CA. pp 195–201

  • Lasserre JP, Mason EG, Watt MS (2007) Assessing corewood acoustic velocity and modulus of elasticity with two impact based instruments in 11-year-old trees from a clonal-spacing experiment of Pinus radiata D. Don. Forest Ecol Manag 239:217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon JM Jr, Jordan L, Schmileck LR, Clark A III, Daniels RF (2009) A comparison of sampling methods for a standing tree acoustic device. South J Appl For 33(2):62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mora CR, Schimleck LR, Isik F, Mahon JM, Clark A III, Daniels RF (2009) Relationship between acoustic variables and different measures of stiffness in standing Pinus taeda trees. Can J For Res 39:1421–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CA, Joe B, Anderson DW, Watt DJ (2008) Effect of thinning on relationships between three measures of wood stiffness in Pinus radiata: standing trees vs. logs vs. short clear specimens. Can J For Res 38:2870–2879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X (1999) Stress wave-based nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods for wood quality of standing trees. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, Houghton

  • Wang X, Ross RJ, McClellan M, Barbour RJ, Erickson JR, Forsman JW, McGinnis GD (2001) Nondestructive evaluation of standing trees with stress wave method. Wood Fiber Sci 33(4):522–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Ross RJ, Brashaw BK, Punches J, Erickson JR, Forsman JW, Pellerin RF (2004) Diameter effect on stress-wave evaluation of modulus of elasticity of small-diameter logs. Wood Fiber Sci 36(3):368–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Ross RJ, Carter P (2007) Acoustic evaluation of wood quality in standing trees. Part 1. Acoustic wave behavior in standing trees. Wood Fiber Sci 39(1):28–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiping Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X. Acoustic measurements on trees and logs: a review and analysis. Wood Sci Technol 47, 965–975 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0552-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0552-9

Keywords

Navigation