Skip to main content
Log in

Lower Bounds for Kernelizations and Other Preprocessing Procedures

  • Published:
Theory of Computing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We first present a method to rule out the existence of parameter non-increasing polynomial kernelizations of parameterized problems under the hypothesis P≠NP. This method is applicable, for example, to the problem Sat parameterized by the number of variables of the input formula. Then we obtain further improvements of corresponding results in (Bodlaender et al. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5125, pp. 563–574, Springer, Berlin, 2008; Fortnow and Santhanam in Proceedings of the 40th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC’08), ACM, New York, pp. 133–142, 2008) by refining the central lemma of their proof method, a lemma due to Fortnow and Santhanam. In particular, assuming that the polynomial hierarchy does not collapse to its third level, we show that every parameterized problem with a “linear OR” and with NP-hard underlying classical problem does not have polynomial self-reductions that assign to every instance x with parameter k an instance y with |y|=k O(1)⋅|x|1−ε (here ε is any given real number greater than zero). We give various applications of these results. On the structural side we prove several results clarifying the relationship between the different notions of preprocessing procedures, namely the various notions of kernelizations, self-reductions and compressions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodlaender, H.L., Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R., Hermelin, D.: On problems without polynomial kernels. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP’08, Track A). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5125, pp. 563–574. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, R., Kadin, Y.: On computing boolean connectives of characteristic functions. Math. Syst. Theory 28, 173–198 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Y., Flum, J.: On parameterized path and chordless path problems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC’07), pp. 250–263 (2007)

  4. Chen, Y., Flum, J.: Subexponential time and fixed-parameter tractability: exploiting the miniaturization mapping. J. Log. Comput. 19(1), 89–122 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chudnovsky, M., Robertson, N., Seymour, P., Thomas, R.: The strong perfect graph theorem. Ann. Math. 164, 51–229 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Flum, J., Grohe, M.: Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fortnow, L., Santhanam: Infeasibility of instance compression and succinct PCPs for NP. In: Proceedings of the 40th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC’08), pp. 133–142. ACM, New York (2008). Full version available at: http://lance.fortnow.com/papers/. Accessed 23 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frick, M., Grohe, M.: The complexity of first-order and monadic second-order logic revisited. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 130, 3–31 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Grandjean, E., Kleine-Büning, H.: SAT-problems and reductions with respect to the number of variables. J. Log. Comput. 7(4), 457–471 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Grohe, M.: Private communication (2008)

  11. Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Invitation to data reduction and problem kernelization. ACM SIGACT News 38(1) (2007)

  12. Harnik, D., Naor, M.: On the compressibility of NP instances and cryptographic applications. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’06), pp. 719–728 (2006). Full version appears as TR06-022 in ECCC Reports 2006, available at http://eccc.hpi-web.de/year/2006/. Accessed 23 May 2010

  13. Impagliazzo, R., Paturi, R., Zane, F.: Which problems have strongly exponential complexity? J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 63, 512–530 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, D.: Announcements, updates, and greatest hits. J. Algorithms 8(3), 438–448 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller, M.: Parameterized randomization. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i.Br. URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-opus-64017. Available at http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/6401/ (2009). Accessed 23 May 2010

  16. Niedermeier, R.: Invitation to Fixed-Parameter Algorithms. Oxford University Press, London (2006)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yap, C.K.: Some consequences of non-uniform conditions on uniform classes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 26, 287–300 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yijia Chen.

Additional information

M. Müller wishes to thank the John Templeton Foundation for its support under Grant #13152, The Myriad Aspects of Infinity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Flum, J. & Müller, M. Lower Bounds for Kernelizations and Other Preprocessing Procedures. Theory Comput Syst 48, 803–839 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-010-9270-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-010-9270-y

Keywords

Navigation