Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Differences Between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam Densitometers

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We compared the bone and body composition results in vivo on two bone densitometers using fan-beam geometry (EXPERT and PRODIGY) with those using pencil-beam geometry (DPX). Measurements were made on large groups of adults ranging in weight from about 50 to 120 kg. Both spine and femur neck BMD on the fan-beam densitometers averaged within 1% of the pencil-beam results, and there was no magnitude dependence of the results by Bland-Altman analysis. Total body BMC and BMD on the PRODIGY and DPX were congruent, but on the EXPERT, BMC was about 2% lower and BMD 2% higher than corresponding values on the DPX. Soft-tissue composition was closely congruent for the PRODIGY and DPX; the comparable EXPERT-DPX differences showed greater scatter but no significant magnitude dependence. The smaller fan-angle of the PRODIGY (4°) probably contributed to its better congruence to pencil-beam results compared with the EXPERT (12°).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 23 February 2000 / Accepted: 14 April 2000 / Online publication: 27 July 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazess, R., Barden, H. Evaluation of Differences Between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam Densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 67, 291–296 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002230001147

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002230001147

Navigation