Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban–Rural Differences in Bone Mineral Density and its Association with Reproductive and Menstrual Factors Among Older Women

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the bone mineral density (BMD) of older women living in rural and urban areas, and evaluate the potential factors affecting the risk of osteoporosis.

Methods

We recruited 574 women aged 65 years or older from rural areas and 496 from urban areas in Shanghai, China. The BMD values of the lumbar vertebrae and total left hip were measured by a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry densitometer. We also recorded information about education level, family income, medications, reproductive and menstrual history, diet, smoking, and alcohol consumption.

Results

Women in urban areas had significantly higher BMD in their lumbar spine, and there was a dramatic increase in the proportion of women with osteoporosis in rural areas. The age at menarche was significantly higher among women living in rural areas, and there were more years from menarche to menopause among urban women. Rural women had significantly higher numbers of both pregnancies and parity, and a significantly lower age at first parity. In multiple linear regression analyses, years from menarche to menopause was independently related to high lumbar spine BMD, while age at menarche and parity was independently related to low lumbar spine BMD.

Conclusion

More older women in rural areas had osteoporosis. Later menarche, less years from menarche to menopause and higher parity might partially contribute to decreased BMD among women in rural areas. More attention should be paid to women in rural areas to prevent bone loss and further bone and health impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (2009) Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 302:1573–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Maalouf G, Gannage-Yared MH, Ezzedine J, Larijani B, Badawi S, Rached A, Zakroui L, Masri B, Azar E, Saba E, Nammari R, Adib G, Abou Samra H, Alrawi Z, Salman S, El Muntasser K, Tarseen R, El Kharousi W, Al-Lamki M, Alothman AN, Almarzook N, El Dessouki M, Sulaimani R, Saleh J, Suhaili AR, Khan A, Delmas P, Seeman E (2007) Middle East and North Africa consensus on osteoporosis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 7:131–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright NC, Saag KG, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris ES (2017) The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the United States: supplementary presentation. Osteoporos Int 28:3283–3284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen P, Li Z, Hu Y (2016) Prevalence of osteoporosis in China: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Public Health 16:1039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo YF, Shi Y, Ruan Y, Wu F (2019) Project profile: Study on global AGEing and adult health in China. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi 40:1203–1205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Si L, Winzenberg TM, Jiang Q, Chen M, Palmer AJ (2015) Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010–2050. Osteoporos Int 26:1929–1937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hendrickx G, Boudin E, Van Hul W (2015) A look behind the scenes: the risk and pathogenesis of primary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11:462–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Si L, Winzenberg TM, Chen M, Jiang Q, Palmer AJ (2015) Residual lifetime and 10 year absolute risks of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men and women. Curr Med Res Opin 31:1149–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, Seeman E, Pasco JA, Kotowicz MA (2002) Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:466–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Omsland TK, Gjesdal CG, Emaus N, Tell GS, Meyer HE (2009) Regional differences in hip bone mineral density levels in Norway: the NOREPOS study. Osteoporos Int 20:631–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer HE, Berntsen GK, Sogaard AJ, Langhammer A, Schei B, Fonnebo V, Forsmo S, Tell GS (2004) Higher bone mineral density in rural compared with urban dwellers: the NOREPOS study. Am J Epidemiol 160:1039–1046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maddah M, Sharami SH, Karandish M (2011) Educational difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a study in northern Iran. BMC Public Health 11:845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaidya SV, Ekbote VH, Khadilkar AV, Chiplonkar SA, Pillay D, Divate U (2012) Bone status of women over 40 years of age from two socioeconomic strata. Endocrine Res 37:25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paschalis EP, Gamsjaeger S, Hassler N, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Dobnig H, Stepan JJ, Pavo I, Eriksen EF, Klaushofer K (2017) Vitamin D and calcium supplementation for three years in postmenopausal osteoporosis significantly alters bone mineral and organic matrix quality. Bone 95:41–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen VH (2017) Osteoporosis prevention and osteoporosis exercise in community-based public health programs. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 3:18–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Capriotti T, Scanlon M (2018) Osteoporosis: a clinical update for home healthcare clinicians. Home Healthcare Now 36:216–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Honda Y (2011) Amelioration of osteoporosis and hypovitaminosis D by sunlight exposure in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 17:22–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fox KM, Magaziner J, Sherwin R, Scott JC, Plato CC, Nevitt M, Cummings S (1993) Reproductive correlates of bone mass in elderly women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Mineral Res 8:901–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hua J, Zhu L, Du W, Du L, Luo T, Wu Z (2016) Infant's sex, birth control policy and postpartum well-being: a prospective cohort study in Shanghai, China. BMJ Open 6:e012207

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ax E, Warensjo Lemming E, Becker W, Andersson A, Lindroos AK, Cederholm T, Sjogren P, Fung TT (2016) Dietary patterns in Swedish adults; results from a National Dietary Survey. Br J Nutr 115:95–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallagher JC (2015) Bone mineral density measurements: how often should bone mineral density be measured in postmenopausal women? Results from the Women's Health Initiative study. Menopause 22:581–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JE, Lee SR, Song HK (2016) Muscle mass is a strong correlation factor of total hip BMD among Korean premenopausal women. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2:99–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thaung Zaw JJ, Howe PRC, Wong RHX (2018) Postmenopausal health interventions: time to move on from the Women's Health Initiative? Ageing Res Rev 48:79–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker-Bone K, D'Angelo S, Syddall HE, Palmer KT, Cooper C, Coggon D, Dennison EM (2014) Exposure to heavy physical occupational activities during working life and bone mineral density at the hip at retirement age. Occup Environ Med 71:329–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gannage-Yared MH, Chemali R, Yaacoub N, Halaby G (2000) Hypovitaminosis D in a sunny country: relation to lifestyle and bone markers. J Bone Miner Res 15:1856–1862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu X, Zhao X, Lu H, Jiang F, Ma X, Zhu S (2011) Association between sleep duration and bone mineral density in Chinese women. Bone 49:1062–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaats GR, Preuss HG, Croft HA, Keith SC, Keith PL (2011) A comparative effectiveness study of bone density changes in women over 40 following three bone health plans containing variations of the same novel plant-sourced calcium. Int J Med Sci 8:180–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Miao J, Wu X (2016) Urbanization, socioeconomic status and health disparity in China. Health Place 42:87–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu Y, Osterle A (2017) Rural-urban disparities in unmet long-term care needs in China: the role of the hukou status. Soc Sci Med 191:30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deardorff J, Abrams B, Ekwaru JP, Rehkopf DH (2014) Socioeconomic status and age at menarche: an examination of multiple indicators in an ethnically diverse cohort. Ann Epidemiol 24:727–733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Vecek N, Vecek A, Zajc Petranovic M, Tomas Z, Arch-Vecek B, Skaric-Juric T, Milicic J (2012) Secular trend of menarche in Zagreb (Croatia) adolescents. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 160:51–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Min J, Xue H, Wang VHC, Li M, Wang Y (2017) Are single children more likely to be overweight or obese than those with siblings? The influence of China's one-child policy on childhood obesity. Prev Med 103:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Q, Greenbaum J, Zhang WD, Sun CQ, Deng HW (2018) Age at menarche and osteoporosis: a Mendelian randomization study. Bone 117:91–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuh D, Muthuri S, Cooper R, Moore A, Mackinnon K, Cooper C, Adams JE, Hardy R, Ward KA (2016) Menopause, reproductive life, hormone replacement therapy, and bone phenotype at age 60–64 years: a british birth cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:3827–3837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuh D, Muthuri SG, Moore A, Cole TJ, Adams JE, Cooper C, Hardy R, Ward KA (2016) Pubertal timing and bone phenotype in early old age: findings from a British birth cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 45:1113–1124

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Miyauchi Y, Sato Y, Kobayashi T, Yoshida S, Mori T, Kanagawa H, Katsuyama E, Fujie A, Hao W, Miyamoto K, Tando T, Morioka H, Matsumoto M, Chambon P, Johnson RS, Kato S, Toyama Y, Miyamoto T (2013) HIF1alpha is required for osteoclast activation by estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:16568–16573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Samuels A, Perry MJ, Tobias JH (1999) High-dose estrogen induces de novo medullary bone formation in female mice. J Bone Miner Res 14:178–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pacifici R (2008) Estrogen deficiency, T cells and bone loss. Cell Immunol 252:68–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. We JS, Han K, Kwon HS, Kil K (2018) Effect of childbirth age on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Korean Med Sci 33:e311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shin CS, Choi HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JT, Yu SH, Koo BK, Cho HY, Cho SW, Kim SW, Park YJ, Jang HC, Kim SY, Cho NH (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in Korea: a community-based cohort study with lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density. Bone 47:378–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cooke-Hubley S, Gao Z, Mugford G, Kaiser SM, Goltzman D, Leslie WD, Davison KS, Brown JP, Probyn L, Lentle B, Prior JC, Kovacs CS (2019) Parity and lactation are not associated with incident fragility fractures or radiographic vertebral fractures over 16 years of follow-up: Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Arch Osteoporos 14:49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Crandall CJ, Liu J, Cauley J, Newcomb PA, Manson JE, Vitolins MZ, Jacobson LT, Rykman KK, Stefanick ML (2017) Associations of parity, breastfeeding, and fractures in the women's health observational study. Obstet Gynecol 130:171–180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee EN, Choe SY, Choi EH, Lee MJ (2019) Effects of parity and breast feeding duration on the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal korean women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Menop Med 25:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Charoenphandhu N, Wongdee K, Krishnamra N (2010) Is prolactin the cardinal calciotropic maternal hormone? Trends Endocrinol Metab 21:395–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rillema JA, Hill MA (2003) Prolactin regulation of the pendrin-iodide transporter in the mammary gland. Am J Physiol 284:E25–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Qi MC, Zou SJ, Han LC, Zhou HX, Hu J (2009) Expression of bone-related genes in bone marrow MSCs after cyclic mechanical strain: implications for distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Sci 1:143–150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Nikander R, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Kannus P (2005) Femoral neck structure in adult female athletes subjected to different loading modalities. J Bone Miner Res 20:520–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1704300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81730107, 81973876), Shanghai TCM Medical Center of Chronic Disease (2017ZZ01010) and Three Years Action to Accelerate the Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine Plan (ZY(2018–2020)-CCCX-3003), the Program for Innovative Research Team of Ministry of Education of China (IRT1270), the Program for Innovative Research Team of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2015RA4002) and Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM201808072).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yongjun Wang, Bing Shu and Qi Shi designed the work; Jing Wang, Bing Shu, Weiqiang Zhang, Xiaoyun Wang, Chenguang Li, Jinlong Li, Yongjian Zhao, Lin Chen, Xiaofeng Qi, Liang Qiao, Weiwei Da, Li Liu, Chongqing Xu, Sen Zhu, Yimian Li, Hao Zhang, Nannan Sha, Qiang Wang, Yin Zhu, Jianxing Luo, Xuejun Cui, Qianqian Liang, Sheng Lu performed the clinical investigations and data acquisition; Jing Wang, Xiaoyun Wang and Weiqiang Zhang undertook the analyses; Jing Wang, Bing Shu, Xiaoyun Wang and Weiqiang Zhang wrote the initial draft; Bing Shu and Yongjun Wang critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongjun Wang or Bing Shu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jing Wang, Weiqiang Zhang, Xiaoyun Wang, Chenguang Li, Jinlong Li, Yongjian Zhao, Lin Chen, Xiaofeng Qi, Liang Qiao, Weiwei Da, Li Liu, Chongqing Xu, Sen Zhu, Yimian Li, Hao Zhang, Nannan Sha, Qiang Wang, Yin Zhu, Jianxing Luo, Xuejun Cui, Qianqian Liang, Sheng Lu, Qi Shi, Yongjun Wang and Bing Shu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

The study was approved by the Ethics Board of Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All the involved participants signed the informed consent forms before inclusion in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Zhang, W., Wang, X. et al. Urban–Rural Differences in Bone Mineral Density and its Association with Reproductive and Menstrual Factors Among Older Women. Calcif Tissue Int 106, 637–645 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-020-00681-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-020-00681-8

Keywords

Navigation