Skip to main content
Log in

Managing a Bone Healthy Lifestyle After Attending Multifaceted Group Education

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined patients with osteoporosis implementation of recommendations regarding a bone healthy lifestyle after the patients attended multifaceted osteoporosis group education (GE). Our findings suggest that GE can support and influence patients’ transfer of preventive actions. Still patients are challenged by concerns related to social roles and physical ability. We investigated if and how patients implemented knowledge from attending multifaceted osteoporosis GE in their daily lives. An interpretive description design using ethnographic field work was applied. In all 14 women and three men diagnosed with osteoporosis who attended multifaceted GE at a Danish hospital participated. Data consisted of field work and individual interviews in the participants’ everyday environment after completion of GE. After attending multifaceted GE, participants experienced increased attention to and reflected more on how to implement osteoporosis preventive actions or activities. Participants who felt confident on how to act and experienced a clear need and motivation, or who could make the preventive activity into a social event, demonstrated an increased implementation of the preventive activity. On the contrary, attending GE was in some cases not sufficient to overcome social and physical concerns, or to eliminate uncertainty about recommendations or to make participants identify with the osteoporosis diagnosis, which thus impeded implementation of a bone healthy lifestyle. Attending multifaceted GE can support and influence participants’ transfer of preventive actions into daily life. Being aware of how concerns about valued social roles and physical ability interfere with the implementation of medical recommendations obviously needs attention during GE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sale JE, Gignac MA, Hawker G, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Webster F, Frankel L, Elliot-Gibson V (2014) Non-pharmacological strategies used by patients at high risk for future fracture to manage fracture risk–a qualitative study. Osteoporos Int 25:281–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182:1864–1873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoving C, Visser A, Mullen PD, van den Borne B (2010) A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns 78:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mol A (2008) The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen D, Ryg J, Nielsen W, Knold B, Nissen N, Brixen K (2010) Patient education in groups increases knowledge of osteoporosis and adherence to treatment: a two-year randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 81:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattingly C, Gron L, Meinert L (2011) Chronic homework in emerging borderlands of healthcare. Cult Med Psychiatry 35:347–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strauss A, Glaser BG (1985) Chronic illness and the quality of life. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bury M (1982) Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn 4:167–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bury M (1991) The Sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociol Health Illn 13:451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson JC, Ong BN, Sim J (2006) Is chronic widespread pain biographically disruptive? Soc Sci Med 63:1573–1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wind G (2009) Tacit narratives—life with chronis illness in an anthropological perspective. ViaSystime, Aarhus

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S (1998) Illness in the context of older age: the case of stroke. Sociol Health Illn 20:489–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonner FJ Jr, Sinaki M, Grabois M, Shipp KM, Lane JM, Lindsay R, Gold DT, Cosman F, Bouxsein ML, Weinstein JN, Gallagher RM, Melton LJ III, Salcido RS, Gordon SL (2003) Health professional’s guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14(Suppl 2):S1–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen AL, Lomborg K, Wind G, Langdahl BL (2014) Effectiveness and characteristics of multifaceted osteoporosis group education—a systematic review. Osteoporosis Int 25:1209–1224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24:23–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen M (2007) Lifestyle: suggesting mechanisms and a definition from a cognitive science perspective. Environ Dev Sustain 11:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen D, Huniche L, Brixen K, Sahota O, Masud T (2012) Handling knowledge on osteoporosis—a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 27:516–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weston JM, Norris EV, Clark EM (2011) The invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. Qual Health Res 21:1692–1704

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K (2006) Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn 2:185–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilkins S (2001) Women with osteoporosis: strategies for managing aging and chronic illness. J Women Aging 13:59–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blalock SJ, Currey SS, DeVellis RF, DeVellis BM, Giorgino KB, Anderson JJ, Dooley MA, Gold DT (2000) Effects of educational materials concerning osteoporosis on women’s knowledge, beliefs, and behavior. Am J Health Promot 14:161–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brecher LS, Pomerantz SC, Snyder BA, Janora DM, Klotzbach-Shimomura KM, Cavalieri TA (2002) Osteoporosis prevention project: a model multidisciplinary educational intervention. JAOA: J Am Osteopath Assoc 102:327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Winzenberg TM, Oldenburg B, Frendin S, De Wit L, Jones G (2005) Effects of bone density feedback and group education on osteoporosis knowledge and osteoporosis self-efficacy in premenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Densitom 8:95–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jensen BB, Schnack K (1997) The action competence approach in environmental education. Environ Educ Res 3:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wahlgren B, Aarkrog V (2012) Transfer: kompetence i en professionel sammenhæng. Aarhus Universitetsforlag, Aarhus

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qvist N, Bergstrom I, Kronhed ACG, Karlsson S, Forss A (2011) Empowering the fragile body: experiences of a back muscle group training program in postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures. A qualitative interview study. Adv Physiother 13:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gold DT, Bales CW, Lyles KW, Drezner MK (1989) Treatment of osteoporosis. The psychological impact of a medical education program on older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 37:417–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2007) Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thorne S (2008) Interpretive description. Left Coast Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wind G (2008) Negotiated interactive observation: doing fieldwork in hospital settings. Anthropol Med 15:79–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Reventlow S, Overgaard IS, Hvas L, Malterud K (2008) Metaphorical mediation in women’s perceptions of risk related to osteoporosis: a qualitative interview study. Health Risk Soc 10:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bartl R, Frisch B (2009) Osteoporosis: diagnosis, prevention, therapy. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Cooper C, Mitchell P, Kanis JA (2011) Breaking the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 22:2049–2050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jenkins R (2008) Social identity. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Solimeo SL, Silverman SL, Calderon AD, Nguyen A, Gold DT (2012) Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporotic males using the Male OPAQ. Osteoporos Int 23:841–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beaton DE, Sujic R, McIlroy BK, Sale J, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER (2012) Patient perceptions of the path to osteoporosis care following a fragility fracture. Qual Health Res 22:1647–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reginster JY, Burlet N (2006) Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone 38:S4–S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Risør MB (2003) Practical reasoning as everyday knowledge: health, risk and lifestyle in health promotion and the everyday life of pregnant smokers. Folk 45:61–85

    Google Scholar 

  40. Werner P (2005) Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporos Int 16:115–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chesbro SB, Davis LA (2002) Applying knowles’ model of andragogy to individualized osteoporosis education. J Geriatr Phys Ther 25:8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA (1998) The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kirwan C (2009) Improving learning transfer. A guide to getting more out of what you put into training. Gower, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  44. Andersen SL, Steffen V (2013) Sygdom normalitet og egenomsorg: diabetiske fodsår og valgfrihedens logik (Illness, normality and self-management: diabetic foot ulsers and the logic of choice). Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund (J Res Sick Soc) 19:121–140

    Google Scholar 

  45. World Medical Association (2011) World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Ref Type: Internet Communication

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Danish National Osteoporosis Society and Aarhus University Hospital funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annesofie Lunde Jensen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Annesofie Lunde Jensen, Kirsten Lomborg, Bente Lomholt Langdahl and Gitte Wind declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency [ID no. 2013-41-2655] and followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration [45]. All participants gave written informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jensen, A.L., Lomborg, K., Langdahl, B.L. et al. Managing a Bone Healthy Lifestyle After Attending Multifaceted Group Education. Calcif Tissue Int 99, 272–281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0147-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0147-1

Keywords

Navigation