Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Micro-CT Analysis of Radiation-Induced Osteopenia and Bone Hypovascularization in Rat

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract often requires external radiation therapy. However, radiation affects all the components of bone, with different degrees of sensitivity, and may produce severe side effects such as mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Intraosseous vascularization is thought to be decreased after irradiation, but its impact on total bone volume is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intraosseous vascularization, cortical bone thickness, and total bone volume in a rat model of ORN versus nonirradiated rats, using a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis after intracardiac injection of a contrast agent. The study was performed on 8-week-old Lewis 1A rats (n = 14). Eleven rats underwent external irradiation on the hind limbs by a single 80-Gy dose. Three rats did not receive irradiation and served as controls for statistical analysis. Eight weeks after the external irradiation, all the animals received a barium sulfate intracardiac injection under general anesthesia. All samples were analyzed with the micro-computed tomography system at a resolution of 5.5 μm. The images were later processed to create 3D reconstructions and study vascularization, bone volume, and cortical thickness. Data from irradiated and nonirradiated rats were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. No animal died after irradiation. Nineteen irradiated tibias and six nonirradiated tibias were included for micro-CT analysis. The vessel percentage was significantly lower in irradiated bones (p = 0.0001). The distance between the vessels, a marker of vascular destruction, was higher after irradiation (p = 0.001). The vessels were also more altered distally after irradiation (p = 0.028). Cortical thickness was severely decreased after irradiation, sometimes even reduced to zero. Both trabecular and cortical structures were destroyed after irradiation, with wide bone gaps. Finally, both total bone volume (p = 0.0001) and cortical thickness (p = 0.0001) were significantly decreased in irradiated tibias compared to nonirradiated tibias. These results led to multiple spontaneous fractures in the irradiated group, and the destruction of intraosseous vessels observed macroscopically with the radiographic preview. This study revealed the impact of radiation on intraosseous vasculature and cortical bone with a micro-CT analysis in a rat ORN model. Hypovascularization and osteopenia are consistent with the literature, contributing a morphological scale with high resolution. Visualization of the vasculature by micro-CT is an innovative technique to see the changes after radiation, and should help adjust bone tissue engineering in irradiated bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jegoux F, Malard O, Goyenvalle E, Aguado E, Daculsi G (2010) Radiation effects on bone healing and reconstruction: interpretation of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(2):173–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein JB, Thariat J, Bensadoun R-J, Barasch A, Murphy BA, Kolnick L et al (2012) Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy: from cancer treatment to survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin 62(6):400–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pitkänen MA, Hopewell JW (1983) Functional changes in the vascularity of the irradiated rat femur. Implications for late effects. Acta Radiol Oncol 22(3):253–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Okunieff P, Wang X, Rubin P, Finkelstein JN, Constine LS, Ding I (1998) Radiation-induced changes in bone perfusion and angiogenesis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42(4):885–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dudziak ME, Saadeh PB, Mehrara BJ, Steinbrech DS, Greenwald JA, Gittes GK et al (2000) The effects of ionizing radiation on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1049–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nyaruba MM, Yamamoto I, Kimura H, Morita R (1998) Bone fragility induced by X-ray irradiation in relation to cortical bone-mineral content. Acta Radiol 39(1):43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao X, Wu X, Frassica D, Yu B, Pang L, Xian L et al (2011) Irradiation induces bone injury by damaging bone marrow microenvironment for stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(4):1609–1614

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenner M, Park J, Schulz N, Amann K, Grabenbauer GG, Fahrig A et al (2010) Validation of histologic changes induced by external irradiation in mandibular bone. An experimental animal model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marxen M, Thornton MM, Chiarot CB, Klement G, Koprivnikar J, Sled JG et al (2004) MicroCT scanner performance and considerations for vascular specimen imaging. Med Phys 31(2):305–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zagorchev L, Oses P, Zhuang ZW, Moodie K, Mulligan-Kehoe MJ, Simons M et al (2010) Micro computed tomography for vascular exploration. J Angiogenesis Res 2:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fei J, Jia F, Peyrin F, Françoise P, Malaval L, Vico L et al (2010) Imaging and quantitative assessment of long bone vascularization in the adult rat using microcomputed tomography. Anat Rec 293(2):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jing XL, Farberg AS, Monson LA, Donneys A, Tchanque-Fossuo CN, Buchman SR (2012) Radiomorphometric quantitative analysis of vasculature utilizing micro-computed tomography and vessel perfusion in the murine mandible. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr 5(4):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roche B, David V, Vanden-Bossche A, Peyrin F, Malaval L, Vico L et al (2012) Structure and quantification of microvascularisation within mouse long bones: what and how should we measure? Bone 50(1):390–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarrut D, Bardiès M, Boussion N, Freud N, Jan S, Létang J-M et al (2014) A review of the use and potential of the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code for radiation therapy and dosimetry applications. Med Phys 41(6):064301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balogh JM, Sutherland SE (1989) Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible: a review. J Otolaryngol 18(5):245–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein JB, Wong FL, Stevenson-Moore P (1987) Osteoradionecrosis: clinical experience and a proposal for classification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(2):104–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marx RE (1983) A new concept in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(6):351–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dambrain R (1993) The pathogenesis of osteoradionecrosis. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 94(3):140–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delanian S, Depondt J, Lefaix J-L (2005) Major healing of refractory mandible osteoradionecrosis after treatment combining pentoxifylline and tocopherol: a phase II trial. Head Neck 27(2):114–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang DT, Sandow PR, Morris CG, Hollander R, Scarborough L, Amdur RJ et al (2007) Do pre-irradiation dental extractions reduce the risk of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible? Head Neck 29(6):528–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee IJ, Koom WS, Lee CG, Kim YB, Yoo SW, Keum KC et al (2009) Risk factors and dose–effect relationship for mandibular osteoradionecrosis in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol 75(4):1084–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopewell JW (2003) Radiation-therapy effects on bone density. Med Pediatr Oncol 41(3):208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopewell JW, Campling D, Calvo W, Reinhold HS, Wilkinson JH, Yeung TK (1986) Vascular irradiation damage: its cellular basis and likely consequences. Br J Cancer Suppl 7:181

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Villars F, Guillotin B, Amédée T, Dutoya S, Bordenave L, Bareille R et al (2002) Effect of HUVEC on human osteoprogenitor cell differentiation needs heterotypic gap junction communication. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(4):C775–C785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaigler D, Wang Z, Horger K, Mooney DJ, Krebsbach PH (2006) VEGF scaffolds enhance angiogenesis and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects. J Bone Miner Res 21(5):735–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chim SM, Tickner J, Chow ST, Kuek V, Guo B, Zhang G et al (2013) Angiogenic factors in bone local environment. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 24(3):297–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barou O, Mekraldi S, Vico L, Boivin G, Alexandre C, Lafage-Proust MH (2002) Relationships between trabecular bone remodeling and bone vascularization: a quantitative study. Bone 30(4):604–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barth HD, Zimmermann EA, Schaible E, Tang SY, Alliston T, Ritchie RO (2011) Characterization of the effects of x-ray irradiation on the hierarchical structure and mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Biomaterials 32(34):8892–8904

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wernle JD, Damron TA, Allen MJ, Mann KA (2010) Local irradiation alters bone morphology and increases bone fragility in a mouse model. J Biomech 43(14):2738–2746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Willey JS, Lloyd SAJ, Robbins ME, Bourland JD, Smith-Sielicki H, Bowman LC et al (2008) Early increase in osteoclast number in mice after whole-body irradiation with 2 Gy X rays. Radiat Res 170(3):388–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the “Liguecontre le cancer” foundation.

Conflict of interest

Guillaume Michel, Pauline Blery, Paul Pilet, Jérôme Guicheux, Olivier Malard, and Florent Espitalier declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Michel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michel, G., Blery, P., Pilet, P. et al. Micro-CT Analysis of Radiation-Induced Osteopenia and Bone Hypovascularization in Rat. Calcif Tissue Int 97, 62–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-0010-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-0010-9

Keywords

Navigation