Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Activity of Epiphyseal Plates in Growing Males and Females

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the age-related activity of the epiphyseal plates, a retrospective study of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scans was undertaken. The study comprised 81 males and 46 females aged 2 weeks to 24 years. The total percentage (%) whole-body (ratio of total physis activity to whole-body activity) and the regional % whole-body (ratio of physis activity of one region to whole-body activity) were derived. The ratio of physis activity of one region to the total physis activity was defined as % physis. Before age 12, total physis activity was found to contribute about 10% to whole-body activity. All total and regional % whole-body activities followed sigmoid curves with age. The differences of the parameters (transition centers and widths) suggested that there might be a later and longer period for the disappearance of physis activity in males than in females. For all the regions, % physis changed little with age until after puberty. At age <1, the proportion of bone activity in the body was about 30–35% for skull, 20–25% for lower limbs, and 5–15% for the rest of the regions. The maximal changes during growth occurred in the skull and the lower limbs. The age-related changes of physis activity during growth reflect a combination of the potential of bone to grow and the processes of bone growth and bone turnover. Bone scintigraphy is useful in understanding the changes of physis activity during growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Der Eerden BC, Karperien M, Wit JM (2003) Systemic and local regulation of the growth plate. Endocr Rev 24:782–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kronenburg HM (2003) Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Isaksson OG, Jansson JO, Gause IA (1982) Growth hormone stimulates longitudinal bone growth directly. Science 216:1237–1243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Roith D, Bondy C, Yakar S, Liu JL, Butler A (2001) The somatomedin hypothesis. Endocr Rev 22:53–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baron J, Klein KO, Colli MJ, Yanovski JA, Novosad JA, Bacher JD, Cutler GB Jr (1994) Catch-up growth after glucocorticoid excess( a mechanism intrinsic to the growth plate. Endocrinology 135:1367–1371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin EA, Ritman EL, Turner RT (2003) Time course of epiphyseal growth plate fusion in rat tibiae. Bone 32:261–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pritchett JW (1992) Longitudinal growth and growth-plate activity in the lower extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2:274–279

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pritchett JW (1991) Growth plate activity in the upper extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaramillo D, Villegas-Medina OL, Doty DK, Rivas R, Strife K, Dwek JR, Mulkern RV, Shapiro F (2004) Age-related vascular changes in the epiphyseal, physis, and metaphysis: normal findings on gadolinium-enhanced MRI of piglets. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:353–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevens DG, Boyer MI, Bowen CV (1999) Transplantation of epiphyseal plate allografts between animals of different ages. J Pediatr Orthop 19:398–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guillemart A, Besnard JC, Le Pape A, Galy G, Fetissoff F (1978) Skeletal uptake of pyrophosphate labeled with technetium-95m and technetium-96, as evaluated by autoradiography. J Nucl Med 19:895–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guillemart A, Le Pape A, Galy G, Besnard JC (1980) Bone kinetics of calcium-45 and pyrophosphate labeled with technetium-96: an autoradiographic evaluation. J Nucl Med 21:466–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimeglio A (2001) Growth in pediatric orthopedics. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL (eds), Lovell and Winter’s Pediatric Orthopedics, 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 54–58

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parfitt AM (2002) Misconceptions (1): epiphyseal fusion causes cessation of growth. Bone 30:337–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roach HI, Mehta G, Oreffo RO, Clarke NM, Cooper C (2003) Temporal analysis of rat growth plates: cessation of growth with age despite presence of a physis. J Histochem Cytochem 51:373–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kigami Y, Yamamoto I, Ohnishi H, Miura H, Ohnaka Y, Ota T, Yuu I, Masuda K, Morita R (1996) Age-related change of technetium-99m-HMDP distribution in the skeleton. J Nucl Med 37:815–818

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Israel O, Lubllshitzky R, Frenkel A (1994) Bone turnover in cortical and trabecular bone in normal women and women with osteoporosis. J Nucl Med 135:1155–1158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.-T. A. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, KT.A., Yang, A.D. Evaluation of Activity of Epiphyseal Plates in Growing Males and Females. Calcif Tissue Int 78, 348–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-0269-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-0269-3

Keywords

Navigation