Skip to main content
Log in

Sinusoidal forearm tracking with delayed visual feedback I. Dependence of the tracking error on the relative delay

I. Dependence of the tracking error on the relative delay

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

During forearm tracking of a sinusoidally moving target matching of proprioceptive and visual feedback was altered by introducing different visual delays. In five normal subjects seven target frequencies were tested ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 Hz. For each target frequency nine different delays were used ranging from 0 to 120% of the cycle duration with target frequency and delay being varied randomly. Tracking error revealed a cyclic behaviour with an increase up to delays of about 50% of the target cycle duration and an improvement for delays larger than 50%. Modulation of response frequency was less pronounced compared with tracking error variation but also was dependent on relative phase. The response frequency matched the target frequency at delays of 0 and 100% of cycle duration and was slightly lower than the target frequency with relative delays of about 50%. The introduction of a visual delay during sinusoidal forearm tracking leads to a spatial in addition to the temporal mismatch between proprioception and vision. The temporal and the spatial incompatibility influence the tracking performance differentially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 20 February 1996 / Accepted: 26 March 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langenberg, U., Hefter, H., Kessler, K. et al. Sinusoidal forearm tracking with delayed visual feedback I. Dependence of the tracking error on the relative delay. Exp Brain Res 118, 161–170 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050268

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050268

Navigation