Abstract
Reflex head-righting in normal and labyrinthine-defective (LD) subjects was compared to identify the relative functional effectiveness of vestibular-collic and cervico-collic myotactic reflexes. To restrict stimuli largely to the head and neck, subjects lay supine, supported up to the shoulders on a horizontal bed with their head supported in a sling over the edge. The head fell freely as the sling was released with an electromagnetic catch. Head drops were delivered with the subjects instructed to relax and accept the fall passively or to actively right the head as fast as possible. With both instructions, righting responses in normal subjects commenced with electromyographic (EMG) bursts in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) at 24.5 ms latency, which was reflected in a deceleration of the downwards head velocity. The latency of the earliest EMG responses in LD subjects was 67.4 ms, accompanied by similar deceleration. It is assumed that the earliest response in normal subjects is vestibular, whereas in LDs the SCM stretch reflex is the earliest response. These reflexes are followed at circa 100 ms by more intense EMG activity due to voluntary movement, but braking of head fall is evident before voluntary activity takes effect. Righting was more effective in normal subjects than in LDs, and when “active” normal subjects made more vigorous righting responses than when “passive”; whereas active righting in LDs was no better than passive. The results demonstrate that reflex responses contribute significantly to head-righting. The vestibular contribution gives an advantage over stretch reflexes alone and also assists in voluntary enhancement of reflex responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 18 November 1996 / Accepted: 26 June 1997
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ito, Y., Corna, S., von Brevern, M. et al. The functional effectiveness of neck muscle reflexes for head-righting in response to sudden fall. Exp Brain Res 117, 266–272 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050221
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050221