Abstract
In the present study, we measured whether competence-related high and low social status attributed to two unknown individuals affects participants’ implicit reactivity to abstract stimuli associated to the identity of the same individuals. During a status-inducing procedure, participants were asked to play an interactive game with two (fake) players coded as high vs low status based on their game competence. Before and after the game, a modified version of the Affective Misattribution Procedure (AMP) was administered in which the players’ faces were used as primes. The evaluation target, as is typical to AMP, was a Chinese ideogram. There were two different presentation timings for the prime image: 75 ms and 17 ms. After the status-inducing procedure, the evaluation targets preceded by the high-status prime (i.e. best player’s face) were rated as more pleasant than those preceded by the low-status prime (i.e. worst player’s face). This effect was only found, however, for the 75 ms lasting prime. Moreover, explicit ratings of the primes showed that the high-status player was rated as more intelligent, competent and dominant than the low status one. These results indicate that implicit preference and explicit evaluation of unacquainted individuals are rapidly modulated by competence-based social status attribution, thus hinting at the plastic nature of social categorization and, relatedly, the malleability of visual preference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson C, Kilduff GJ (2009) The pursuit of status in social groups. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(5):295–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x
Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (2000) Studying the mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. Handb Res Methods Soc Psychol 2:253–285
Boksem MA, Kostermans E, Milivojevic B, De Cremer D (2011) Social status determines how we monitor and evaluate our performance. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 7(3):304–313
Breton A, Jerbi K, Henaff MA, Cheylus A, Baudouin JY, Schmitz C, Van Der Henst JB (2014) Face the hierarchy: ERP and oscillatory brain responses in social rank processing. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091451
Breton A, Ligneul R, Jerbi K, George N, Baudouin JY, Van Der Henst JB (2019) How occupational status influences the processing of faces: an EEG study. Neuropsychologia 122:125–135
Chapais B (2015) Competence and the evolutionary origins of status and power in humans. Human Nat 26(2):161–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6
Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J (2013) Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J Pers Soc Psychol 104(1):103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
Chiesa PA, Liuzza MT, Acciarino A, Aglioti SM (2015) Subliminal perception of others’ physical pain and pleasure. Exp Brain Res 233(8):2373–2382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4307-8
Cloutier J, Gyurovski I (2014) Ventral medial prefrontal cortex and person evaluation: forming impressions of others varying in financial and moral status. NeuroImage 100:535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.024
Cooley E, Payne BK, Phillips KJ (2014) Implicit bias and the illusion of conscious ill will. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 5(4):500–507
Dalmaso M, Pavan G, Castelli L, Galfano G (2012) Social status gates social attention in humans. Biol Let 8(3):450–452. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0881
Deaner RO, Khera AV, Platt ML (2005) Monkeys pay per view: adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Curr Biol 15(6):543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.044
Era V, Candidi M, Aglioti SM (2015) Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli. Exp Brain Res 233(11):3271–3281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4395-5
Farmer H, Carr EW, Svartdal M, Winkielman P, Hamilton AFDC (2016) Status and power do not modulate automatic imitation of intransitive hand movements. PLoS One 11(4):e0151835
Ferguson MJ, Bargh JA (2004) How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends Cognit Sci 8(1):33–39
Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P, Xu J (2018) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. In Social cognition. Routledge, pp 171–222
Foulsham T, Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Henrich J, Kingstone A (2010) Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking. Cognition 117(3):319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003
Fragale AR, Overbeck JR, Neale MA (2011) Resources versus respect: social judgments based on targets’ power and status positions. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(4):767–775
Gjoneska B, Liuzza MT, Porciello G, Caprara GV, Aglioti SM (2019) Bound to the group and blinded by the leader: ideological leader–follower dynamics in a trust economic game. Roy Soc Open Sci 6(9):182023
Green AR, Carney DR, Pallin DJ, Ngo LH, Raymond KL, Iezzoni LI, Banaji MR (2007) Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. J Gen Intern Med 22(9):1231–1238
Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR (2009) Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Personal Soc Psychol 97(1):17
Gyurovski I, Kubota J, Cardenas-Iniguez C, Cloutier J (2018) Social status level and dimension interactively influence person evaluations indexed by P300s. Soc Neurosci 13(3):333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1326400
Hardy CL, Van Vugt M (2006) Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32(10):1402–1413
Haxby JV, Ungerleider LG, Horwitz B, Maisog JM, Rapoport SI, Grady CL (1996) Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93(2):922–927
Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolut Human Behav 22(3):165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
Huo YJ, Binning KR (2008) Why the psychological experience of respect matters in group life: an integrative account. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 2(4):1570–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00129.x
Imhoff R, Banse R (2009) Ongoing victim suffering increases prejudice: the case of secondary anti-Semitism. Psychol Sci 20(12):1443–1447
Inzlicht M, Gutsell JN, Legault L (2012) Mimicry reduces racial prejudice. J Exp Soc Psychol 48(1):361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.007
Jost JT, Banaji MR (1994) The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. Br J Soc Psychol 33(1):1–27
Jost JT, Burgess D (2000) Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 26(3):293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265003
Jost JT, Banaji MR, Nosek BA (2004) A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychol 25(6):881–919
Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM (1997) The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17(11):4302–4311
Killgore WD, Yurgelun-Todd DA (2001) Sex differences in amygdala activation during the perception of facial affect. Neuroreport 12(11):2543–2547
Liuzza MT, Cazzato V, Vecchione M, Crostella F, Caprara GV, Aglioti SM (2011) Follow my eyes: the gaze of politicians reflexively captures the gaze of ingroup voters. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025117
Ly M, Haynes MR, Barter JW, Weinberger DR, Zink CF (2011) Subjective socioeconomic status predicts human ventral striatal responses to social status information. Curr Biol 21(9):794–797
Marsh AA, Blair KS, Jones MM, Soliman N, Blair RJ (2009) Dominance and submission: the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and responses to status cues. J Cogn Neurosci 21(4):713–724. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21052
Mattan BD, Kubota JT, Cloutier J (2017) How social status shapes person perception and evaluation: a social neuroscience perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci 12(3):468–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616677828
Mattan BD, Kubota JT, Li T, Venezia SA, Cloutier J (2019) Implicit evaluative biases toward targets varying in race and socioeconomic status. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219835230
Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311(5765):1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123007
Morgan D, Grant KA, Prioleau OA, Nader SH, Kaplan JR, Nader MA (2000) Predictors of social status in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) after group formation. Am J Primatol 52(3):115–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2345(200011)52:3%3c115:AID-AJP1%3e3.0.CO;2-Z
Murphy ST, Zajonc RB (1993) Affect, cognition, and awareness: affectivePriming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J Pers Soc Psychol 64:723–739
Payne BK, Cheng CM, Govorun O, Stewart BD (2005) An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol 89(3):277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
Ponsi G, Panasiti MS, Rizza G, Aglioti SM (2017) Thermal facial reactivity patterns predict social categorization bias triggered by unconscious and conscious emotional stimuli. Proc R Soc B 284(1861):20170908
Porciello G, Liuzza MT, Minio-Paluello I, Caprara GV, Aglioti SM (2016) Fortunes and misfortunes of political leaders reflected in the eyes of their electors. Exp Brain Res 234(3):733–740
Pryor JB, Reeder GD, Wesselmann ED, Williams KD, Wirth JH (2013) The influence of social norms upon behavioral expressions of implicit and explicit weight-related stigma in an interactive game. Yale J Biol Med 86(2):189
Ratcliff NJ, Hugenberg K, Shriver ER, Bernstein MJ (2011) The allure of status: high-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 37(8):1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407210
Rohr M, Degner J, Wentura D (2015) The “emotion misattribution” procedure: processing beyond good and bad under masked and unmasked presentation conditions. Cogn Emot 29(2):196–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.898613
Santamaria-Garcia H, Burgaleta M, Sebastian-Galles N (2015) Neuroanatomical markers of social hierarchy recognition in humans: a combined ERP/MRI study. J Neurosci 35(30):10843–10850. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1457-14.2015
Santamaría-García H, Pannunzi M, Ayneto A, Deco G, Sebastián-Gallés N (2013) “If you are good, i get better”: the role of social hierarchy in perceptual decision-making. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 9(10):1489–1497. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst133
Shariff AF, Tracy JL (2009) Knowing who’s boss: implicit perceptions of status from the nonverbal expression of pride. Emotion 9(5):631
Singer T, Kiebel SJ, Winston JS, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2004) Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron 41(4):653–662
Stanley D, Phelps E, Banaji M (2008) The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 17(2):164–170
Thomas AJ, Thomsen L, Lukowski AF, Abramyan M, Sarnecka BW (2018) Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force. Nat Hum Behav 2(9):662
Tinio PP, Leder H (2009) Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 130(3):241–250
Varnum MEW (2013) What are lay theories of social class? PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070589
Willer R (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: the status so- lution to the collective action problem. Am Sociol Rev 74:23–43
Zink CF, Tong Y, Chen Q, Bassett DS, Stein JL, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2008) Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron 58(2):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.025
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Francesco Zorzi and Daniele Esposito for acting as model confederates in the study and Jack Spittle (john.spittle89@gmail.com) for proofreading the manuscript.
Funding
This study was partially funded by an ERC advanced Grant (eHONESTY) and a PRIN grant from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (n. 20159CZFJK) awarded to SMA. It was also funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata, Giovani Ricercatori 2016, n. GR-2016-02361008) awarded to MC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Carlo Alberto Marzi.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boukarras, S., Era, V., Aglioti, S.M. et al. Modulation of preference for abstract stimuli following competence-based social status primes. Exp Brain Res 238, 193–204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05702-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05702-z