Abstract
Cognitive style refers to the preference in perceiving, organizing and remembering information. Different cognitive styles have been identified across the years. Amongst others, field-dependence/independence cognitive style is the extent to which the person perceives part of a field as discrete from the surrounding environment as a whole, rather than embedded in the field. Instead, visualizer/verbalizer cognitive style involves the preference in processing visual versus verbal information. Both cognitive styles can influence navigational behaviour. The present study aimed at clarifying the extent to which field-dependence/independence and visualizer/verbalizer cognitive styles affect route-based navigational tasks. Therefore, 44 healthy participants from L’Aquila City were assessed for their cognitive styles and were asked to perform two different navigational tasks: reorder paths using a series of photos depicting landmarks from L’Aquila (visually presented task, visual path task—VisPT); orally describe specific paths of L’Aquila (verbally presented task, verbal path task—VerPT). Results showed that the field-independence cognitive style predicted response times of VisPT, whereas the visualizer/verbalizer cognitive style predicted the instructions given when performing the VerPT, namely, the number of metrical distance indicators provided by participants. By investigating two different cognitive styles, the study clarifies that field-dependence/independence and visualizer/verbalizer cognitive styles can play a different role in spatial navigation and suggests that the material by which a navigational task is presented affects its performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport GW (1937) Personality: a psychological Interpretation. Henry & Holt Company, New York
Antonietti A, Giorgetti M (1992) Inside the verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style: distinguishing ability, habit, and preference for the use of mental images in thought. In: IV European workshop on imagery and cognition, Puerto de la Cruz (Tenerife), 16–19 December 1992, pp 222–227
Antonietti A, Giorgetti M (1993) Pensare attraverso immagini. La misura della tendenza alla visualizzazione mentale. Vita e Pensiero, Milan
Bianchini F, Incoccia C, Palermo L, Piccardi L, Zompanti L, Sabatini U, Peran P, Guariglia C (2010) Developmental topographical disorientation in a healthy subject. Neuropsychologia 48:1563–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.025
Boccia M, Nemmi F, Guariglia C (2014) Neuropsychology of environmental navigation in humans: review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies in healthy participants. Neuropsychol Rev 24:236–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9247-8
Boccia M, Piccardi L, Di Marco M, Pizzamiglio L, Guariglia C (2016) Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence. Exp Brain Res 234:2799–2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9
Boccia M, Piccardi L, D’Alessandro A, Nori R, Guariglia C (2017a) Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy. Exp Brain Res 235:1741–1748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4936-1
Boccia M, Vecchione F, Piccardi L, Guariglia C (2017b) Effect of cognitive style on learning and retrieval of navigational environment. Front Pharmacol 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00496
Caduff D, Timpf S (2008) On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cogn Process 9:249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2
Childers T, Houston M, Heckler S (1985) Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. J Consum Res 12:125–134
Denis M (1997) The description of routes: a cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Curr Psychol Cogn 16:409–458
Evans C, Richardson JT, Waring M (2013) Field independence: reviewing the evidence British. J Educ Psychol 83:210–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12015
Ferlazzo F, Piccardi L, Burattini C, Barbalace M, Giannini AM, Bisegna F (2014) Effect of new light sources on task switching and mental rotation performance. J Environ Psychol 39:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.005
Fogliani MT, Fogliani A, Di Nuovo S (1984) Dipendenza dal campo e stile cognitivo. Organizzazioni Speciali, Florence
Green KE, Schroeder DH (1990) Psychometric quality of the verbalizer—visualizer questionnaire as a measure of cognitive style. Psychol Rep 66:939–945
Guay RB (1977) Purdue spatial visualization test—visualization of rotations. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette
Hegarty M, Waller D (2004) A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence 32:175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001
Iachini T, Ruotolo F, Ruggiero G (2009) The effects of familiarity and gender on spatial representation. J Environ Psychol 29:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.07.001
Iaria G, Incoccia C, Piccardi L, Nico D, Sabatini U, Guariglia C (2005) Lack of orientation due to a congenital brain malformation: a case study. Neurocase 11:463–474 https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790500423602
Iaria G, Bogod N, Fox CJ, Barton JJ (2009) Developmental topographical disorientation: case one. Neuropsychologia 47:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.021
Jonassen D, Grabowski B (1993) Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey
Klein GS, Schlesinger HJ (1951) Perceptual attitudes toward instability: I. Prediction of apparent movement experiences from Rorschach responses. J Pers 19:289–302
Knoll AR, Otani H, Skeel RL, Van Horn KR (2017) Learning style, judgements of learning, and learning of verbal and visual information. Br J Psychol 108:544–563
Kozhevnikov M (2007) Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychol Bull 133:464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M (2001) A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Mem Cogn 29:745–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200477
Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M, Mayer RE (2002) Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cogn Instr 20:47–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_3
Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual-cognitive style. Mem Cogn 33:710–726. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337
Kraemer DJ, Rosenberg LM, Thompson-Schill SL (2009) The neural correlates of visual and verbal cognitive styles. J Neurosci 29:3792–3798. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4635-08.2009
Kraemer DJ, Hamilton RH, Messing SB, Desantis JH, Thompson-Schill SL (2014) Cognitive style, cortical stimulation, and the conversion hypothesis. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00015
Kraemer DJ, Schinazi VR, Cawkwell PB, Tekriwal A, Epstein RA, Thompson-Schill SL (2017) Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: the effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 43:611–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000314
Kyritsis M, Gulliver SR, Morar S, Macredie R (2009) Impact of cognitive style on spatial knowledge acquisition. In: Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo., New York
Mayer RE, Massa LJ (2003) Three facets of visual and verbal learners: cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. J Educ Psychol 95:833–846
Meier B, Rothen N (2013) Grapheme-color synaesthesia is associated with a distinct cognitive style. Front Psychol 4:632
Mitolo M, Gardini S, Caffarra P, Ronconi L, Venneri A, Pazzaglia F (2015) Relationship between spatial ability, visuospatial working memory and self-assessed spatial orientation ability: a study in older adults. Cogn Process 16:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0647-3
Nori R, Piccardi L (2010) Familiarity and spatial cognitive style: how important are they for spatial representation? In: Thomas JB (ed) Spatial memory: visuospatial processes, cognitive performance and developmental effects. Nova Science, New York
Nori R, Piccardi L (2012) Il senso dell’orientamento: quanto conta la familiarità con l’ambiente? Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 39:343–368
Nori R, Bensi L, Gambetti E, Giusberti F (2014) Individual differences in the enhanced cognitive interview: the role of imagery. Psychol Crime Law 20:833–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.885968
O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Paivio A (1971) Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart
Paivio A, Harshman RA (1983) Analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habit skills. Can J Exp Psychol 37:461–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080749
Palermo L, Iaria G, Guariglia C (2008) Mental imagery skills and topographical orientation in humans: a correlation study. Behav Brain Res 192:248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.014
Pazzaglia F, De Beni R (2001) Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals European. J Cogn Psychol 13:493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440042000124
Pazzaglia F, De Beni R (2006) Are people with high and low mental rotation abilities differently susceptible to the alignment effect? Perception 35:369–383. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5465
Pazzaglia F, Moè A (2013) Cognitive styles and mental rotation ability in map learning. Cogn Process 14:391–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0572-2
Piccardi L, Risetti M, Nori R (2011) Familiarity and environmental representations of a city: a self-report study. Psychol Rep 109:309–326. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.13.17.PR0.109.4.309-326
Piccardi L, Bocchi A, Palmiero M, Verde P, Nori R (2017) Mental imagery skills predict the ability in performing environmental directional judgements. Exp Brain Res 235:2225–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4966-8
Prestopnik J, Roskos-Ewoldsen B (2000) The relations among wayfinding strategy, use, sense of direction, sex, familiarity, and wayfinding ability. J Environ Psychol 29:177–191. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0160
Richardson A (1977) Verbalizer-visualizer: a cognitive style dimension. J Mental Imag 1:109–125
Riding R, Cheema I (1991) Cognitive styles: an overview and integration. Educ Psychol 11:193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301
Sadler-Smith E, Riding R (2004) Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instr Sci 27:355–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892031
Spoltore JD, Smock DJ (1983) The verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire: additional normative data. Percept Motor Skills 56:382
Stevens MJ, Rapp BJ, Pfost KS, Johnson JJ (1986) Furher evidence of the stability of the verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire. Percept Motor Skills 62:301–302
Tascón L, Boccia M, Piccardi L, Cimadevilla JM (2017) Differences in spatial memory recognition due to cognitive style. Front Pharmacol 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00550
Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208
Warren R, Good G (1979) The verbalizer-visualizer questionnaire: further normative data. Percept Motor Skills 48:372
Witkin HA (1977) Cognitive style in personal and cultural adaption. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Clark University Press, Massachusetts
Witkin HA, Oltman PK, Raskin E, Karp S (1971) A manual for the embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
Witkin HA, Moore CA, Goodenough DR, Cox PW (1977) Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev Educ Res 47:1–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1975.tb01065.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bocchi, A., Giancola, M., Piccardi, L. et al. How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!. Exp Brain Res 236, 3121–3129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5367-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5367-3