Abstract
Evidence is mounting that differences in postural instability can be used to predict who will experience strong illusory self-motions (vection) and become sick when exposed to global patterns of optical flow (e.g., Apthorp et al., PLoS One 9(12):e113897, 2014; Stoffregen and Smart, Brain Res Bull 47:437–448, 1998). This study compared the predictive ability of traditional and recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) based measures of postural activity. We initially measured spontaneous fluctuations in the centre of foot pressure (CoP) of our subjects as they stood quietly with their eyes open and closed. They were then repeatedly exposed to two different types of self-motion display. As expected, the oscillating self-motion displays were found to induce stronger vection and greater sickness than the smooth self-motion displays. RQA based measures of spontaneous postural activity proved to be superior predictors of both vection strength and visually induced motion sickness (VIMS). Participants who had displayed lower CoP recurrence rates when standing quietly were more likely to later report stronger vection and VIMS when exposed to both types of optical flow. Vection strength (but not VIMS) was also found to correlate significantly with three other RQA based measures of postural activity (determinism, entropy, and average diagonal line length). We propose that these RQA based measures of spontaneous postural activity could serve as useful diagnostic tools for evaluating who will benefit the most/least from exposure to virtual environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Further supporting this proposal, a recent study appears to show that postural instability can also predict the strength of auditory induced vection (see Mursic et al. 2017).
Subjects were informed that they might experience slight motion sickness during the visual motion displays and that if this occurred, or if they experienced any other problem during the experiment, they would be free to withdraw with full credit.
The FMS scale has been previously validated against the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)—see Keshavarz and Hecht (2011).
Stoffregen et al. (2013) have reported that terrestrial measures of postural activity did predict the severity of subsequently experienced sea-sickness.
A reviewer noted that this Dennison and D’Zmura (2017) study appeared to equate “more sway” with “less stability” and that this might underlie their failure to find a relationship between postural activity and sickness. Riccio and Stoffregen’s (1991) postural instability theory does not predict that motion sickness will be preceded by “more sway”, but rather that people who later become sick will have different sway to those who remain well. We agree with the reviewer that postural instability cannot be defined, solely or even primarily, in terms of the spatial magnitude of movement (for further discussion please see Bonnet et al. 2006; Riccio and Stoffregen 1991; Stoffregen 2011; Stoffregen et al. 2010).
Linear measures (such as sway path length) assume the output of the system will be directly proportional to its input. However, because postural stability is achieved via the interaction of a number of different systems it is thought that its outputs should be inherently non-linear.
References
Apthorp D, Palmisano S (2014) The role of perceived speed in vection: does perceived speed modulate the jitter and oscillation advantages? PLoS One 9(3):e92260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092260
Apthorp D, Nagle F, Palmisano S (2014) Chaos in balance: non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion. PLoS One 9(12):e113897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113897
Bonato F, Bubka A, Palmisano S, Phillip D, Moreno G (2008) Vection change exacerbates simulator sickness in virtual environments. Presence 17(3): 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.17.3.283
Bonnet CT, Faugloire E, Riley MA, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA (2006) Motion sickness preceded by unstable displacements of the center of pressure. Hum Mov Sci 25(6):800–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.03.001
Bubka A, Bonato F, Palmisano S (2008) Expanding and contracting optic flow patterns and vection. Perception 37:704–711. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5781
Chang CH, Pan WW, Tseng LY, Stoffregen TA (2012) Postural activity and motion sickness during video game play in children and adults. Exp Brain Res 217(2):299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2993-4
Chang CH, Pan WW, Chen FC, Stoffregen TA (2013) Console video games, postural activity, and motion sickness during passive restraint. Exp Brain Res 229(2):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3609-y
Chen DJ, Chow EH, So RH (2011) The relationship between spatial velocity, vection, and visually induced motion sickness: an experimental study. i-Perception 2(4):415. https://doi.org/10.1068/ic415
Crampton GH, Young FA (1953) The differential effects of a rotary visual field on susceptibles and nonsusceptibles to MS. J Comp Physiol Psychol 46:451–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058423
Dennison MS, D’Zmura M (2017) Cybersickness without the wobble: experimental results speak against postural instability theory. Appl Ergon 58:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.014
Dichgans J, Brandt T (1978) Visual-vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Leibowitz H, Teuber H-L (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 8. Springer, New York, pp 755–804
Diels C, Ukai K, Howarth PA (2007) Visually induced motion sickness with radial displays: effects of gaze angle and fixation. Aviat Space Environ Med 78(7):659–665
Faugloire E, Bonnet CT, Riley MA, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA (2007) Motion sickness, body movement, and claustrophobia during passive restraint. Exp Brain Res 177:520–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0700-7
Flanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG (2002) Optokinetic nystagmus, vection and motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 73:1067–1073
Flanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG (2004) The role of vection, eye movements and postural instability in the etiology of motion sickness. J Vestib Res 14:335–346
Golding JF (2006) Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire. Personal Individ Differ 41:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012
Hettinger LJ, Riccio GE (1992) Visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments. Presence 1:306–310 https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.306
Hettinger LJ, Berbaum K, Kennedy R, Dunlap WP, Nolan MD (1990) Vection and simulator sickness. Mil Psychol 2:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0203_4
Hu S, Davis MS, Klose AH, Zabinsky EM, Meux SP, Jacobsen HA, Westfall JM, Gruber MB (1997) Effects of spatial frequency of a vertically striped rotating drum on vection-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 68(4):306–311
Hufschmidt A, Dichgans J, Mauritz KH, Hufschmidt M (1980) Some methods and parameters of body sway quantification and their neurological application. Archiv für Psychiatrie Nervenkrankheiten 228:135–150
Ji JT, So RH, Cheung RT (2009) Isolating the effects of vection and optokinetic nystagmus on optokinetic rotation-induced motion sickness. Hum Factors 51(5):739–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809349708
Keshavarz B, Hecht H (2011) Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. Hum Factors 53:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811403736
Keshavarz B, Hettinger LJ, Kennedy RS, Campos JL (2014) Demonstrating the potential for dynamic auditory stimulation to contribute to motion sickness. PLoS One 9(7):e101016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101016
Keshavarz B, Hecht H, Lawson B (2015a) Visually induced motion sickness: causes characteristics, and countermeasures. In: Hale KS, Stanney KM (eds) Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 532–587
Keshavarz B, Riecke BE, Hettinger LJ, Campos JL (2015b) Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? Front Psychol 6(472):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00472
Keshavarz B, Novak AC, Hettinger LJ, Stoffregen TA, Campos JL (2017) Passive restraint reduces visually induced motion sickness in older adults. J Exp Psychol Appl 23(1):85–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000107
Kim J, Palmisano S (2008) Effects of active and passive viewpoint jitter on vection in depth. Brain Res Bull 77:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.09.011
Kim J, Palmisano S, Bonato F (2012) Simulated angular head oscillation enhances vection in depth. Perception 41:402–414. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6919
Klosterhalfen S, Muth ER, Kellermann S, Meissner K, Enck P (2008) Nausea induced by vection drum: contributions of body position, visual pattern, and gender. Aviat Space Environ Med 79(4):384–389
Koslucher F, Haaland E, Stoffregen TA (2014) Body load and the postural precursors of motion sickness. Gait Posture 39(1):606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.016
Koslucher F, Haaland E, Stoffregen TA (2016) Sex differences in visual performance and postural sway precede sex differences in visually induced motion sickness. Exp Brain Res 234(1):313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4462-y
Lawson B (2005) Exploiting the illusion of self-motion (vection) to achieve a feeling of “virtual acceleration” in an immersive display. In: Stephanidis C (ed) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on human–computer interaction. Las Vegas, NV, pp 1–10
Lawson B (2015) Motion sickness symptomatology and origins. In: Hale KS, Stanney KM (eds) Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 532–587
Lee DN, Lishman JR (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Mov Stud 1:87–95
Li X, Ouyang G, Yao X, Guan X (2004) Dynamical characteristics of pre-epileptic seizures in rats with recurrence quantification analysis. Phys Lett A 333(1):164–171
Marwan N, Romano MC, Thiel M, Kurths J (2007) Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys Rep 438(5–6):237–329. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090708
Merhi O, Faugloire E, Flanagan M, Stoffregen TA (2007) Motion sickness, console video games, and head-mounted displays. Hum Factors 49(5):920–934. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X230262
Moss JD, Muth ER (2011) Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Hum Factors 53(3):308–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811405196
Munafo J, Diedrick M, Stoffrege TA (2017) The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects. Exp Brain Res 235(3):889–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4846-7
Mursic RA, Riecke BE, Apthorp D, Palmisano S (2017) The Shepard-Risset glissando: music that moves you. Exp Brain Res 235(10):3111–3127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5033-1
Newell KM, Slobounov SM, Slobounova BS, Molenaar PCM (1997) Short-term non-stationarity and the development of postural control. Gait Posture 6(1):56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01103-4
Nooij SA, Pretto P, Oberfeld D, Hecht H, Bülthoff HH (2017) Vection is the main contributor to motion sickness induced by visual yaw rotation: Implications for conflict and eye movement theories. PLoS One 12(4): e0175305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175305
Norman J (2002) Two visual systems and two theories of perception. Behav Brain Sci 25:73–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0200002X
Owen N, Leadbetter AG, Yardley L (1998) Relationship between postural control and motion sickness in healthy subjects. Brain Res Bull 47(5):471–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00101-4
Palmisano S, Bonato F, Bubka A, Folder J (2007) Vertical display oscillation increases vection in depth and simulator sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 78:951–956
Palmisano S, Allison RS, Pekin F (2008) Accelerating self-motion displays produce more compelling vection in depth. Perception 37:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5806
Palmisano S, Kim J (2009) Effects of gaze on vection from jittering, oscillating and purely radial optic flow. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:1842–1853. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1842
Palmisano S, Pinniger GJ, Ash A, Steele JR (2009) Effects of simulated viewpoint jitter on visually induced postural sway. Perception 38:442–453. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6159
Palmisano S, Allison RS, Kim J, Bonato F (2011) Simulated viewpoint jitter shakes sensory conflict accounts of self-motion perception. See Perceiving 24:173–200. https://doi.org/10.1163/187847511X570817
Palmisano S, Kim J, Freeman TCA (2012) Horizontal fixation point oscillation and simulated viewpoint oscillation both increase vection in depth. J Vis 12(15):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.12.15
Palmisano S, Apthorp D, Seno T, Stapley PJ (2014) Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection. Exp Brain Res 232:1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y
Palmisano S, Allison R, Schira M, Barry RJ (2015) Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures and neural bases. Front Psychol 6:193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00193
Palmisano S, Mursic R, Kim J (2017) Vection and cybersickness generated by head-and-display motion in the Oculus Rift. Displays 46:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2016.11.001
Pellecchia GL, Shockley K (2005) Application of recurrence quantification analysis: influence of cognitive activity on postural fluctuations. In: Riley MA, Van Orden GC (eds) Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences (Chap 3) pp 95–141. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp. Retrieved 12 Nov 2017
Previc FH, Mullen TJ (1990) A comparison of the latencies of visually induced postural change and self-motion perception. J Vestib Res 1:317–323
Prothero JD, Draper MH, Furness TA 3rd, Parker DE, Wells MJ (1999) The use of an independent visual background to reduce simulator side-effects. Aviat Space Environ Med 70:277–283
Rebenitsch L, Owen C (2016) Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Real 20:101–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9
Reed-Jones RJ, Vallis LA, Reed-Jones JG, Trick LM (2008) The relationship between postural stability and virtual environment adaptation. Neurosci Lett 435(3):204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.02.047
Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA (1991) An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol Psychol 3:195–240. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0303_2
Riecke BE (2010) Compelling self-motion through virtual environments without actual self-motion – using self-motion illusions (“Vection”) to improve user experience in VR. In: Kim J-J (ed) Virtual reality, pp 149–176. InTech. https://www.intechopen.com/books/virtualreality/compelling-self-motion-through-virtual-environments-without-actual-self-motion-using-self-motion-ill
Riecke BE, Jordan JD (2015) Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection). Front Psychol 6:713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00713
Riecke BE, Feuereissen D, Rieser JJ, McNamara TP (2012) Self-motion illusions (vection) in VR—are they good for anything? In: IEEE virtual reality 2012. Orange County, CA, USA, pp 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2012.6180875
Riecke BE, Feuereissen D, Rieser JJ, McNamara TP (2015) More than a cool illusion? Functional significance of self-motion illusion (circular vection) for perspective switches. Front Psychol 6:1174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01174
Riley MA, Balasubramaniam R, Turvey MT (1999) Recurrence quantification analysis of postural fluctuations. Gait Posture 9(1):65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(98)00044-7
Schumann T, Redfern MS, Furman JM, El-Jaroudi A, Chaparro LF (1995) Time-frequency analysis of postural sway. J Biomech 27:603–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)00113-I
Seno T, Ito H, Sunaga S, Nakamura S (2010a) Temporonasal motion projected on the nasal retina underlies expansion-contraction asymmetry in vection. Visi Res 50:1131–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.020
Seno T, Ito H, Sunaga S (2010b) Vection after effects from expanding/contracting stimuli. See Perceiving 23:273–294
Smart LJ, Stoffregen TA, Bardy BG (2002) Visually induced motion sickness predicted by postural instability. Hum Factors 44:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497745
Stoffregen TA (2011) Motion sickness considered as a movement disorder. Sci Motricité 74:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2011111
Stoffregen TA, Smart LJ (1998) Postural instability precedes motion sickness. Brain Res Bull 47:437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00102-6
Stoffregen TA, Hettinger LJ, Haas MW, Roe MM, Smart LJ (2000) Postural instability and motion sickness in a fixed-base flight simulator. Hum Factors 42(3):458–469. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779698097
Stoffregen TA, Faugloire E, Yoshida K, Flanagan MB, Merhi O (2008) Motion sickness and postural sway in console video games. Hum Factors 50(2):322–331. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250755
Stoffregen TA, Yoshida K, Villard S, Scibora L, Bardy BG (2010) Stance width influences postural stability and motion sickness. Ecol Psychol 22:169–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2010.496645
Stoffregen TA, Chen F-C, Varlet M, Alcantara C, Bardy BG (2013) Getting your sea legs. PLoS One 8(6):e66949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066949
Stoffregen TA, Chen YC, Koslucher FC (2014) Motion control, motion sickness, and the postural dynamics of mobile devices. Exp Brain Res 232(4):1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3859-3
Tanahashi S, Ujike H, Kozawa R, Ukai K (2007) Effects of visually simulated roll motion on vection and postural stabilization. J NeuroEng Rehabil 4:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-39
Thurrell AEI, Bronstein AM (2002) Vection increases the magnitude and accuracy of visually evoked postural responses. Exp Brain Res 147:558–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1296-1
Tjernström F, Björklund M, Malmström EM (2015) Romberg ratio in quiet stance posturography—test to retest reliability. Gait Posture 42(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.007
Villard SJ, Flanagan MB, Albanese GM, Stoffregen TA (2008) Postural instability and motion sickness in a virtual moving room. Hum Factors 50:332–345. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250728
Webb NA, Griffin MJ (2002) Optokinetic stimuli: motion sickness, visual acuity, and eye movements. Aviat Space Environ Med 73:351–358
Webb NA, Griffin MJ (2003) Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision. Aviat Space Environ Med 74:622–625
Yokota Y, Aoki M, Mizuta K, Ito Y, Isu N (2005) Motion sickness susceptibility associated with visually induced postural instability and cardiac autonomic responses in healthy subjects. Acta Oto-laryngologica 125(3) 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480510003192
Young SD, Adelstein BD, Ellis SR (2006) Demand characteristics of a questionnaire used to assess motion sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2006, IEEE, New York, NJ, 2006, pp 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.44
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a University of Wollongong, Faculty of Social Sciences, Near Miss Grant awarded to SP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmisano, S., Arcioni, B. & Stapley, P.J. Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity. Exp Brain Res 236, 315–329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5130-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5130-1